I originally came from Hawkes Bay and I know the flat land on the coastal plain between the rivers – rivers that have flooded in the past, viz these photos.
You can see it’s nothing new – except it appears the people in 1938 only had mainly mud and silt to contend with. One of our customers describes how, in the Hawkes Bay floods, a tree went into one end of a house at Eskdale and out the other.
Where did all the wood come from that destroyed bridges and buildings? Did forestry slash from carbon offset planting cause or contribute to the flooding in the east coast provinces of Hawkes Bay and Gisborne?
It’s not climate change that’s ruining our communities – it’s the belief in climate change, leading to the conversion of productive farms and destroying communities with crazy goals like “carbon net zero.”
Auckland was also affected by flooding. What part has local and regional government had to play in this? When they funded the economy through immigration, did they ever stop to think about our infrastructure?
Where to from here? I believe every weather event is going to be used to justify Agenda 2030 and the carbon trade scam that started with energy traders like Al Gore and his cronies from Enron. It will be to the detriment of our communities and economy. We have to ask ourselves, who benefits?
We’re now into the escalated climate scare scam stage of the journey which suddenly upscaled immediately after the downscaling of the plandemic and its experimental, ‘safe and effective’ treatment.” TWNZ
Cloud seeding. Is it a thing? Yes.It has being carried out in the US from the 1960s onwards.The UAE performs about 1,000 hours of cloud seeding on average each year in order to supplement the minimal rainfall it receives.
Did it happen in Auckland? How can we prove that?
Weather is weather and we live in a variable system. New Zealand can have four seasons in one day.
We should look for a natural explanation first. These are Arcus clouds, also called Roll clouds. The fact that a Hercules was seen in the morning is not remarkable, there’s an Airforce base at Whenuapai and that’s where they train the heavy transport pilots.
Clouds seen in West Auckland before the Jan 27th storm
That doesn’t mean there’s no cloud seeding. There are evil people at the top of the world’s pyramid who have the means, motive and opportunity to try weather modification. Will they try it in order to justify climate lockdowns? It’s possible. But lets keep our heads out of the clouds.
They’ll use propaganda first, they already are. Our despicable media were already banging on about “climate change” at the 2am media briefing on Jan the 28th. They now do it every time there’s a storm. Chris Hipkins refused to answer their breathless questions about climate change, he said “that’s a political issue.”
We can’t prove weather modification, but we can prove propaganda. Let’s change what we can change, attack the false reporting and point it out when we see it.
A rare type of cloud known as a Morning Glory cloud can stretch 1,000 kilometers long and occur at altitudes up to two kilometers high. Although similar roll clouds have been seen at specific places across the world, the ones over Burketown, QueenslandAustralia occur predictably every spring. Long, horizontal, circulating tubes of air might form when flowing, moist, cooling air encounters an inversion layer, an atmospheric layer where air temperature atypically increases with height. Source: NASA
Have you noticed how big and local government are after our cars and blame us for the environmental crimes that big corporations are guilty of?
Petty bureaucrats, government officials and “global stakeholders” serving the green agenda are quite happy to fly to the UN COP meetings every year. It’s okay for them to do that because it’s only our cars and lifestyles that are affecting the planet, never theirs. Listening to their rhetoric about “saving the planet,” I fully expect the climate hypocrites to impede our domestic travel and stop the average Joe from flying.
I’ve been keeping a bit of an eye on their shenanigans since the cancelled COP conference that was going to take place in Santiago, Chile in 2019.
The Santiago conference changed its venue to Spain because of massive protests and rioting by Chileans caused by the failed green energy policies of their president, a UN and WEF shill. The people had enough of delays and electricity outages from switching to an inferior source of power, and then when the prices went up, they hit the roof.
It turns out that the green measures and climate conferences are UNnecessary because the UN have admitted a mistake in the models, which has halved their global warming predictions! This latest revelation should not just change a venue, it should cause a radical rethink of climate change altogether.
But what have we heard from the media? Crickets. The media is too invested in the doomsday scenario and they’re going to look like fools when the public know they’ve been spreading misinformation. They will not back down or apologise for their hubris.
COP27, there is no longer a climate emergency
At the latest conference, COP27 held in Egypt in November 2022, the UN admitted they got it wrong with their scary climate models. Their climate predictions have halved.
Sean Plunket: Here is the big story, the massive story that you won’t get anywhere else in New Zealand. And I want to quote from a piece we’ve now got published in our opinion section that we’ve thankfully republished with the kind permission of the New Zealand Center for Political Research, Muriel Newman’s outfit.
And it’s a piece by Barry Brill. Barry Brill is a former Minister of Energy for New Zealand, former National MP, former Director of Petrocorp, and Chair of the Gas Council Power New Zealand, the BSA and Z. He is currently the chairman of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition. And he’s published a piece that highlights and looks at a New York Times column which contains the shocking revelation that United Nations modeling and predictions for global warming this century have halved. That’s right, halved.
Just a few years ago, climate predictions, and I’m quoting from the article here for this century looked quite apocalyptic, with most scientists warning that continuing business as usual would bring the world four or even five degrees Celsius of warming. A change disruptive enough to call forth not only predictions of food crises and heat stress, state conflict and economic strife, but from some corners, warnings of civilizational collapse, and even a sort of human endgame. Very scary. Five degrees Celsius celsius this century of climate change increase. Guess what that is now 2.5 degrees.
This is from the United Nations itself. 2.5 degrees. A report from the UN climate from UN climate change released on 26 of October. Okay, so about a month ago, it says the world is on track for around two and a half degrees Celsius of warming by the end of the century. This is a major change, people.
And don’t forget, it’s still just a computer bloody model. But the five degrees Celsius has gone to 2.5 degrees. And I don’t think because you’re doing more recycling or I’m not driving the Rangy as much, they just got the figures wrong. And here to talk about what that should mean is Barry Brill, the author of this piece that we’ve published. Barry, welcome to the program. Nice to have you with us.
Barry Brill:
Good morning.
Sean Plunket:
All right, Barry, this is such a huge story, isn’t it?
Barry Brill:
I think it’s the biggest climate change story of the last decade in hearing constant references to five degrees and catastrophe and climate emergency, climate crisis, and even existential threat to the future of humanity. Now, with a stroke, all of that disappears and the four to five degree scenario is suddenly dead and replaced with the United Nations official prediction which it contained in its 132 page book that it prepared for Cop 27, the International Climate Convention, which is just being held in Egypt.
And the official papers prepared for that have section for 2100 on a business as usual basis to 2.5.
When I say a business as usual basis, that 2.5 assumes that we will do no more policies from now on.
So although there are existing climate policies. We are told they haven’t been enough. But if there are no more climate policies, then the models say we will hit 2.5 by the year 2100. That’s a pretty modest figure, the two and a half degree. The Paris agreement in 2015 aimed to get us to two degrees.
Obviously, we’re almost there.
Sean Plunket:
Wow. So the crisis, the climate emergency is over, Barry.
Barry Brill:
Certainly the emergency is over. The attempt to continue to reduce emissions, I no doubt that will carry on, but at least we won’t be hearing these hair raising stories in that what we’re aiming to do and what we think is going to happen is only a half degree difference over a period of 80 years.
Sean Plunket:
Barry this is massive. Why aren’t I reading about this on Stuff and seeing it on TVNZ and Newshub? This is like the end of World War II.
Barry Brill:
It is. We should be declaring victory and dancing in the streets. It’s a strategy that’s been adopted by those who help to orchestrate the worldwide propaganda on the climate and the climate space. Those are usually newspapers by the New York Times. The New York Times and The Guardian and The Economist provide the guardrails which their talking points are almost always repeated by our television stations, the Herald and our other media. But there’s been dead silence on this topic.
Nobody’s attacked it, nobody said it’s not true, they just have said nothing at all.
Sean Plunket:
Well, and of course, it must be difficult for them, given that outfits like Stuff have publicly declared that climate, the science has decided on climate change and they will not publish dissenting views.
They’ve kind of backed themselves into a corner of not being able to report this very significant story.
istockphoto.com
Barry Brill:
Yes, there’s going to be a loss of face, particularly for people like Stuff, whose attitude would have been if that I had written them something, say it might be four and a half degrees, it will be only three degrees. It simply wouldn’t be published because it would be regarded as misinformation. Now the elites are taken out under them entirely by the United Nations itself, coming to this official publication predicting only 2.5 degrees.
And then in getting there, according to Wallace Wells, the person who wrote the lengthy ‘mea culpa’ article in the New York Times, the changes have been that the UN has dropped its highest scenario, known as 8.5, or representative concentration pathway 8.5. And not only that, but they’ve dropped their second scenario of seven as well, now focusing on a pathway which is only 3.4.
These numbers are measures of the amount of warming expected in the year 2100. So the amount previously we had a range which was headed at the top by this extreme case of 8.5, and we now have a likely case, and that is less than half of that at 3.4. But it’s a concern that 8.5, which has been regarded with great suspicion by most objective scientists since it was first introduced over ten years ago, that 8.5 has never seemed plausible as something that could ever happen and now taken off the table entirely.
That causes a significant problem for the New Zealand government in particular because probably to an extent more than any other Ministry for the Environment and NIWA have used 8.5 centimetres for most of their calculations.
Sean Plunket:
So the problem we’ve got, Barry, is that all sorts of groups, mainstream media included, are so invested in the catastrophe of climate change that they are now stuck with if you lie in a situation of cognitive dissonance as they do not know how to stop, well, essentially lying about these consequences.
But I would have thought, Barry, this requires therefore a fundamental rethink of our carbon zero goals of planting out our arable farmland into pinus radiata. This requires going back almost to the drawing board on climate change policies because we’re there, we’ve arrived and we don’t need to keep kicking hell out of our agricultural sector or beating ourselves figuratively over our backs with birch sticks.
A farmer’s signs on SH43, November 2022
Barry Brill:
Yes, quite. I think Milton Keynes is often given credit for the quote that says, “when the facts change, I change my mind.” What do you do? And I would like to put that question to Minister Shaw, the facts have changed, should you change your mind? Whereas up till now he’s been very sound on the whole topic.
Sean Plunket:
Barry, look, some people are going to come back at you and say you are a shill for the oil industry. Tell us about the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition who funds it, just so we can head that one off at the pass.
Barry Brill:
Well, it’s really a small collection of mainly scientists.
We have engineers and some other professionals who are part of it as well. And it is a sort of minor think tank. We keep up to date on all the changes that are occurring in climate, but we fund ourselves, we don’t raise funds from the public. We have never seen a dollar from the oil industry or from the renewable energy industry for that matter either. So there isn’t any funding issue arising.
We have been concerned and have argued for some years that 8.5 was a ridiculous scenario. And we have also argued that the climate sensitivity figure has been too high. Our media over the years runs the same story of shock, horror every day. It never advances to say, well, now, how much climate change do we expect and how much damage will that do? And what is the science on feedbacks? And all the other things would have improved the public education a little on the areas of dispute that are in dispute everywhere. Between the alarmists on the one hand, the lukewarmers, I probably put myself in that category who believe the theory but believe that it’s quite a trivial impact.
And then there are others who don’t believe the theory and or believe that it’s so small that it’s overtaken completely by other activities. Now we don’t have that debate and it must come as a huge shock to our climate change establishment when the predictions that are made from the one source of facts, they cut it in half and say it’s only half as bad.
Sean Plunket:
And of course there’s a possibility it could go down even further.
Barry Brill:
Yes, I think there’s a good possibility that it will go down to two. And I won’t go into the detail of that because it’s a bit technical. But the fact is the difference between the two degree target and the 2.5 which is now predicted, is pretty small because we act as if we have very accurate predictions or very accurate measurements, let alone predictions in ah decades into the future. But in fact, there’s a big error bars around all these figures. So if you say two points …
Sean Plunket:
Well, I would say if we have made the massive and painful changes to our economy, to our agricultural sector, to our lives as a result of predictions of climate change, when those predictions drastically change like this, we must revisit those decisions. There just seems to me it would be crazy not to.
Barry Brill:
Yes. And I also wonder if the plans that have assessed the risks to people who live close to the coast and they may have to migrate their houses away from the coast, if that is progressed and those people resist, then we’re going to find ourselves in court with them with a string of experts pointing out that this 8.5 is gone. It’s no longer adopted anywhere. And James or the government trying to say it doesn’t matter that 8.5 is gone, it doesn’t matter that the …
Sean Plunket:
Well, it does, because how can they win that case? I hear you, Barry. Barry, thank you very much indeed for your time this morning and thank you very much for writing that piece. And I’ll be honest, until I read it, I just didn’t know what I think is the biggest news story of the year. I thank you for your time. That is Barry Brill, former Minister of Energy, former National MP and chairman of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition.
So you heard it here. And do you recognize how significant this is? The United Nations, which kind of sets the pace on doom and gloom predictions for our planet, has halved its expectation of global warming in the next, what, 78 years. Halved!
So essentially the planet is not, not that it ever was burning. Climate change is no longer what some, like Greta would have said, the end of the planet. Not that it ever was. But the science and the figures themselves tell us there is no emergency and there is no crisis. And the stuff we are doing right now that damages people’s lives and livelihoods is unnecessary. It is just woke virtue signaling.
And our mainstream media should be telling you this, but they won’t because they drank the Kool Aid of climate change until it was coming out their ears. And they’re now stuck in a position where they are probably too full of themselves to admit that. And I’m not saying they were wrong. The facts have changed. The science has changed. Science is never settled. The United Nations has halved in the last last month. A month ago, the United Nations halved its prediction for climate change around the globe. We should be having a party.
Are we on the road to a New World Order? Is it already here? What used to be a conspiracy theory seems obvious now.Imagine the signs being like road signs, clearly marked as the architects of the New World Order reach their destination. Since the turn of the 21st century there’s been a major event every seven years.If we follow the seven year pattern the next big event could be due this month. I hope I’m wrong. Meanwhile I want to set up signs and mark the road laid out so far.
The first event was 911 in 2001 where George Bush Junior and Tony Blair very quickly after announced a “New World Order.”
Six weeks after 9/11, President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act, which lowered protections against government collection of Americans’ communications and personal records. The Pentagon developed a vast new surveillance and information analysis system and DARPA hosted and ran the spy program.
The world changed after the towers fell. We started losing our privacy and travel soon became a nightmare, all in the name of “keeping us safe.”
Fourteen years ago in Sept 2008, the GFC
Then in 2008 there was the GFC, the Global Financial Crisis where the stock market plunged 777 points in the biggest fall in history. I don’t think this event was deliberate, given the sevens it was more like a warning from God. George Bush appeared on TV begging for a bailout. The banks were bailed out by the American Tax payer and nothing changed, the money went to the 1% and the bankers carried on embezzling, gambling and guzzling from the money spigot.
I thought after kicking the financial can down the road that it would all come to a screeching halt in 2015 but it didn’t. There were other items on the agenda.
Seven years ago in 2015, the Year of Lucifer
What happened in 2015? A lot of events – the big ones coinciding in September.
To begin with, 2015 was declared to be “The Year of Light” by the UN.
So what you say? Lucifer is known as “the Light Bringer.”
For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works.
In Sydney, Australia the New Year opened with the theme of light as a big lightbulb appeared on the Sydney harbour bridge. Why would a sovereign nation not choose their own theme? Obviously it was orchestrated by the UN. That for me was the first sign of an unknown, unelected world government pulling the strings. Unfortunately the UN government now extends from New York right down to local council level.
Signs in the Heavens
There were signs in the heavens culminating with the fourth moon of the tetrad – a series of four blood moons which began at Easter / Passover of 2014 and ended in September 2015.
On the final blood moon, the United Nations celebrated its 70th anniversary amidst much fanfare as they launched Agenda 2030, the framework for World Government on September 27th 2015.
Pope Francis even flew in to New York for the occasion. He is the 266th pope to reign and he arrived on the 266th day of the year. And it takes around 266 days for a pregnancy! Jesus did say there’d be birth pangs.
I thought about all these events during my Bible reading and the words to the Creedance Clearwater song “Bad Moon Rising” kept coming to mind.”
The Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum means “The New Order of the Ages.” This is what the architects of the New World Order have been working towards. They’ve played a long game.
The pyramid is an important symbol in Freemasonry. They have the eye over the uncapped pyramid in the “accomplishment of the great work.” When will that be? The height of the unfinished Great pyramid of Giza is 146.7m (481.3ft). If you multiply 481.3 feet x 12 inches you get 5775.6 inches.
Freemason Symbols on US dollar. The pyramid has 13 steps and it is unfinished with the year 1776 in roman numerals MDCCLXXV1 at the base of the pyramid.
2015 = Anno Mundi Year 5775
1776 is on the base of the pyramid of the US dollar bill in the form of the Roman numerals MDCCLXXV1, for 1776 the Year of Independance. Under that date is “Novus Ordo Seclorum,” the New Order of the Ages.
The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite use the dating system of Anno Mundi, the Year of the World, where they add 3,760 to the common date. So the common calendar year 2015 would be A.M. 5775.
They also use the Hebrew month and new year, so they begin to add another year after September 17th, making it the year Anno Mundi 5776.
It’s interesting that this branch of Freemasonry is using the Jewish dating system. 2015 was an important year for both Freemasons and Jews as the Year of Lucifer COLLIDED with the Jewish Year of Jubilee. The Year of Jubilee happens after seven lots of seven sabbaths totalling 49 years. For the Jews, it was a Jubilee year on their calendar, which happened on the 50th year, in September.
And now, here’s how the year 2015 or 5775 / 5776 was celebrated:
The Highway to Hell
In the entertainment industry the year 2015 opened in February with the wealthy and powerful wearing devil horns at the Grammys, singing along to “Highway to Hell” by ACDC. It seems a great song to rock to, but consider this:
The gate to hell is wide and the road that leads to it is easy, and there are many who travel it.
Matthew 7:13
There was also an act by Madonna where she danced with horned devils.
The theme was “Darkness to Light.”
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
LOS ANGELES, CA – FEBRUARY 08: Singer Madonna performs onstage during The 57th Annual GRAMMY Awards at the STAPLES Center on February 8, 2015 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Kevin Winter/WireImage)The Grammys 2015
The nations signed Agenda 2030 at the UN in September and the Paris Climate Treaty in December sealed the deal. The carbon tax for the Paris treaty on Climate Change was adopted by consensus on 12 December 2015. Solomon’s tax was 666 talents of gold. Note the atomic number of carbon: carbon has 6 protons, 6 neutrons and 6 electrons, making it the physical representation of 666.
Another Sign in the Heavens, an astroid
In the intervening period a huge asteroid the size of the football stadium had a close encounter with Earth on Oct. 31st 2015. Did you know about that? It was a dead comet in the shape of a skull.
In November 2015, not long before the signing of the Paris Climate Treaty, there was the Friday the 13th Paris attacks. The biggest loss of life was at the Bataclan Theatre where the band on stage, Eagles of Death Metal had started to play “Kiss The Devil.” I guess he showed up, 89 concert goers died while they were singing it. Were they sacrificed?
The Vatican celebrates Agenda 2030
The year concluded in December with the Fiat Lux light show at the Vatican on December 8th 2015. Lux is Latin for light. “I am sorry that the facade of St. Peter’s has been turned into a propaganda stage for the scientific fraud known as ‘Catastrophic Man-Caused Global Warming,” Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, told LifeSiteNews;
“I am sick at the thought that this most sacred space — St. Peter’s Basilica — will be the backdrop for the further dissemination of this fraud, whose ultimate goal is to impose a ‘Carbon Tax’ on the developed countries. This tax will not only cripple global economic growth and undermine democracy, its proceeds will be used to fund even more population control programs in the developing world,” he said.
We’ve had 911 on September 2001, the GFC on September 2008 and the launch of Agenda 2030 on September 2015. Have they got anything planned for September 2022?
The tetrad : 27-28 Sep 2015 The astrological event, known as a blood moon occurred on September 27 in the U.S. and end a just after midnight on September 28. Although blood moon occurs a few times a year in various parts of the world, a tetrad is rare. A blood moon occurs when the earth casts its shadow on a full moon, causing a red glow.
This one is different for several reasons. It is the fourth blood moon in a tetrad and it will fall on the Jewish holiday of Sukkot. The first three instances of the tetrad already occurred on April 15, 2014, which was on Passover, October 8, 2014, on Sukkot, and April 4 of this year on Passover. The last tetrad occurred in 1967 and 1968, when Israel recaptured Jerusalem.
At the same time, uncontrollable fires were raging in California.
The Carbon Tax We will all be subject to a carbon allowance and tax – our “carbon footprint.” The carbon atom is made up of 6 protons, 6 electrons and 6 neutrons. In the name of Agenda 2030, populations will be told to lower their carbon footprint by having one less child, living car free, forgoing air travel, and going vegan. Source: Wikipedia, Carbon Footprint
Contrast this to the lifestyle of the global elite who fly to Davos each year. The phrase “Davos Man” was credited to Samuel P. Huntington, a political scientist who spent the majority of his working life at Harvard University. In 2004, he wrote a paper about elites and “an emerging global superclass” of “Davos men” or “gold-collar workers …” “The rewards of an increasingly integrated global economy have brought forth a new global elite. Labeled ‘Davos Men,’ ‘gold-collar workers’ or… ‘cosmocrats’, this emerging class is empowered by new notions of global connectedness. It includes academics, international civil servants and executives in global companies, as well as successful high-technology entrepreneurs,” Huntington wrote, citing an estimation that this elite would total 40 million people by 2010. He said such global elites “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite’s global operations.” What they enjoy, we will not be permitted to enjoy.
Agenda 21 has been in force in Australia and now they’ve adopted Agenda 2030. “Sustainable Sydney 2030″ is a set of goals we have set for our city to help make it as green, global and connected as possible by 2030. The plan will transform the way we live, work and play.”
Another dating system is Anno Lucis, the year of Light, where you add 4000 years to the current Gregorian year because the world was reated from light 4000 years ago. The year begins in September of the Hebrew calendar. It’s a dating system used in Masonic ceremonial or commemorative proceedings.
Anno Mundi The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite also date their calendar beginning with the creation of the world, but they use the Jewish calendar, or Anno Mundi (In the Year of the World). The Scottish Rite adds 3,760 years to the common date, so the common calendar year 2016 would be A.M. 5776. They also use the Hebrew month and new year, so they begin to add another yearafter September 17th. Source: Grand Lodge of Iowa: Why you should never ask a Freemason the date…
How do you feel watching the news? I’ve only had the news on once this week because it’s full of propaganda – Covid and Climate Change.This week’s doozy was a piece on the island nation of Tuvalu. It showed the Foreign Minister of Tuvalu giving a COP26 speech with the UN flag behind him. “We are sinking,” he said, standing in water to make his point.
Really? Why is he saying that when Tuvalu has actually gained some land?
Tuvalu’s foreign minister standing knee deep in the sea while recording a speech to be delivered at COP-26, designed to induce climate “reparations” from Western democracies.
As early as 2010, research showed the small island nations of Tuvalu and Kiribati were growing, rather than being submerged beneath rising seas. As discussed by the BBC, one study examined 27 islands spanning Tuvalu, Kiribati, and the Federated States of Micronesia, and found that over the last 60 years, 80 percent of the islands either maintained their size or grew, with some growing dramatically.
“Tuvalu’s government feels confident enough in its long-term future that it is building brand new government buildings.” Source: Climate Realism
Tuvalu: a Wiki on National Parliament Buildings Worldwide:
Covering a site of 1800m², the parliament in Tuvalu’s capital and main atoll Funafuti is the largest building anywhere on the atoll. The new building was a gift from the People’s Republic of China to Tuvalu.
What do you think of Greta Thunberg? Did you know that on Sept 23rd 2019, the same day that the child made her impassioned speech at the UN about her fears of a climate emergency, 500 scientists sent a registered letter to the UN Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people?
Unfortunately the scientists were ignored by the UN and the media. Greta stole the show. Opposing voices were accused of “bullying” her.
Now, there is another teenage voice being heard above the shrill cries of the doomsayers.
Her name is Naomi Seibt. She’s not ant-Greta: “The reason I don’t like the term “ant-Greta is it suggests that I myself am an indoctrinated puppet I guess for the other side.”
My thanks to Martin Harris of Uncensored magazine for giving me the link to this young Swedish woman.
The real deal, versus propaganda
Have you heard of promising young inventors like Boyan Slat or Morgan Vague, or experts like Dr Judith Curry? Why aren’t they being promoted? Obviously scientific fact and cleaning the world of the rubbish produced by the multi-nationals is not a priority.
The propaganda value of Greta
What has Greta invented? What are her qualifications? Obviously she’s been used for propaganda.
I am more reminded of Wednesday Adams.
Links
TECHNOCRACY NEWS: A group of 500 esteemed scientists and professionals in climate science have officially notified the United Nations that there is no climate crisis and that spending trillions on a non-problem is ‘cruel and imprudent’. This letter will not make it into national or global media, nor will it cause the UN to change its ways. If these same scientists understood Technocracy, they would change their battle strategy. ⁃ TN Editor
WaPo showcases the “Anti-Greta” Thunberg: In an interesting turn of events, the Washington Post has done a front-page feature on Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic and YouTuber that WaPo describes as “… 19-year-old German who, like Greta, is blond, eloquent and European.”
Australia has suffered a devastating early bush fire season with fires across several states burning through hundreds of thousands of hectares. New South Wales has been the most severely hit, with more than 1.65m hectares razed, an area significantly larger than suburban Sydney.
Of course the fires have been blamed on climate change. Are the Australian fires unprecedented? History would say otherwise. Australia has always had devastating bush fires.
On Christmas Eve, former Australian leader Barnaby Joyce posted a word about the drought and Australian Bushfires on Twitter – which the media called ‘bizarre,’ but I agree with him.
“You don’t need to convince me the climate’s not changing – the climate’s always changing. My problem’s always been how a new tax is going to change it back!”
He mentioned a higher authority at work, beyond our comprehension. “Unless we understand that’s got to be respected, then we’re just fools – we’re going to get nailed.”
I wondered what the Australian Churches are saying about that. It appears they’ve used their Christmas messages to preach about “climate change,” and put pressure on their prime minister to “take action.” Even the media have called that disgusting.
They’re no longer preaching about sin and morality!
There’s a Bible proverb that says “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people. Proverbs 14:34
Laws based on the ten commandments protect a nation spiritually. Have there been any laws made in Australia recently that might remove God’s hand of protection from the land? In 2017 Australia changed the marriage covenant by bringing in same-sex marriage and now the abortion laws have been decriminalised. New South Wales was the last state to do it, changing it’s abortion law on September 26th, 2019. The bush fires broke out soon after in early October.
Is there a link between sin and disaster? I’m not hearing it from the churches in Australia.
New Zealand is next to decriminalise it’s abortion law in line with the demands of the United Nations SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals.) Will it be NZ’s turn to “get nailed?” God doesn’t bring disaster or delight in it, the Bible states what’s needed to heal the land in 2 Chronicles 7:13-14.
It’s up to you, Australian believers to stand in the gap for your land. Prayer changes things. I know you’re out there and we’re with you.
The United Nations Climate Change Conferences are conferences held each year in various locations, where thousands of officials, NGOs and politicians jet in with their fossil-fuel guzzling planes. I note from the “Conference of the Parties” website they present a “Fossil of the Day” award to shame any country burning coal or not meeting it’s UN targets – but they can’t see the irony.
But this time I’m not talking about hypocrisy, I’m going to talk about the effects of UN Goal 13 – Climate Action.
This year, right now – from the 2nd to 13th December 2019, the UN conference was going to take place in Santiago, Chile. The reason it’s not is massive protests and rioting caused by failed energy policies.
How a $0.04 metro fare price hike sparked massive unrest in Chile. Source: Vox
Demonstrations against a hike in metro ticket prices in Chile’s capital exploded into violence on October 18, unleashing widening protests over living costs and social inequality.
Here’s the reason for the price hike in living and metro costs: in 2018 the Chilean government, in a step towards achieving the country’s climate action targets, opted for expensive wind and solar to power most of Santiago Metro’s energy sources.
As a result, Chileans are now burdened by higher Metro fares reflecting unnecessary energy price hikes.
Chile does not lack natural resources – they could have used water and coal, but this is a no-no as far the UN is concerned. The country cancelled two power projects because of aggressive opposition, one a coal-fired plant and the other a hydro-electric scheme. These cancelled projects cost Chile billions.
Former Chilean president Michelle Bachelet (from 2006 to 2010 and 2014 to 2018) called it “a pioneering project of the entire world.” Chilean engineer Douglas Pollock said, “She was probably right because I don’t know of any other country which has done such nonsense. Electricity cost for the subway rose 210%.”
The government also hit the portion of conventional power that remained with new carbon dioxide taxes. Just like France.
Vox reported that 50 percent of Chilean workers earn less than 400,000 pesos per month (roughly $550), making a small change to public transportation costs a plausible breaking point.
Results: riots. This is the effect of climate alarmism, carbon ideology and governments that are UN-concerned with their people. The green policies introduced there have proved so disastrous and unpopular that Chile is in flames.
It seems Chile’s been getting the wrong things into power. Is it time to get out of the UN and find leaders that don’t serve the UN or its partner the World Bank?
An aerial view of a burnt metro station in Santiago. Source: NDTV Metro Stations Burned, Buses Set On Fire In Chile’s Worst Riots In Years.
“Chilean engineer Douglas Pollock (he has an ancestor buried in Westminster Abbey but despite the name, he is very much a Chilean) spoke with tears in his eyes as he outlined the terrible damage that environmentalism has done to his country in such a short space of time.
“You can hear Douglas talk about the tragedy that has befallen his country in the interview above. You can also find his speech, in which he talks in more detail about the damage done by green policy to Chile’s economy here.
Nice one, greenies. You have no claim to the moral high ground. What you are doing to the planet is pure evil.”
UN goal 5 is ‘Gender equality’ and goal 8 is ‘Decent work and economic growth: ‘Buy from green companies that are equal opportunity employers.’
The Prince of Wales addressed the issue of environment during his royal visit to NZ
Prince Charles has been out here in New Zealand again, I don’t know why. He was only here three years ago. Here he is in November 2019, lecturing on the effects of a ‘human spending spree’ of earth’s resources. I wish a reporter would step up and ask ‘who’s doing the spending?’
Charles offered the usual pessimism, doom and gloom, “a tipping point,” wanting us to “take less, make less and dispose of less,” warning us we only have ten years to do it. In 2011 we were warned it was six years. It gets old after a while.
How often do you hear about “climate change” or “global warming” on the news? Can you remember when you first started hearing about it?
Fifty years ago it wasn’t a thing. In the 1970’s we were being warned about “an ice age,” we were told to only have two children and it was predicted we’d run out of food. So I’ve heard it all before. It’s a political agenda designed to scare the public into a new world order.
Joan Veon tells how she received her “wake up call” when she learned that the super-rich elite of the world have been feverishly working to establish a “One World Government” through a multitude of “international” institutions.
How often do you hear the term “sustainable development?” When the term was formulated in 1990 Prince Charles commended those who came up with it for getting the term into everyone’s vocabulary.
In April 1991, fourteen months before Agenda 21 was initiated at Rio, Prince Charles held a private two-day conference aboard the royal yacht Britannia, moored off the coast of Brazil. His goal was to bring together key international figures in an attempt to unite them at the Rio Earth Summit.
On board his yacht were senior officials from the World Bank, chief executives from the big oil companies such as Shell and British Petroleum, key NGOs and other officials. Some of them were energy traders. Al Gore was also present.
They invented the term ‘global warming’ in 1992 and the term was used at the initiation of Agenda 21 in Rio.
“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Earth Summit director at the inititation of Agenda 21 in Rio, 1992.
Energy Trading
Do you know what ‘Emissions Trading’ or cap-and-trade is? It’s Energy trading – an exchange where polluters can buy permits for their pollution. Polluters must hold permits in an amount equal to their emissions. Those who want to increase their emissions must buy permits from others willing to sell them.
Then the merchants graduated to making money out of the air by labelling C02 a pollutant, even though it’s a harmless gas that makes up just 0.058% of the atmosphere.
So it’s money for nothing – like the Pope selling indulgences as licenses to sin. Before graduating to C02 the traders started by buying pollution permits for coal-fired power stations. With this kind of thing, there’s enormous potential of moral risk from greed. Do you know about the scandal of an energy trading company called Enron?
“The close links between Charles and Enron came amid dramatic new evidence of the way the company bought its way into the highest echelons of the British Establishment.” Prince Charles took £1m off Enron
Sustainability?
In 2007 Prince Charles set up The Prince’s Rainforests Project (PRP) in the UK. The project is working with governments, businesses and non-profit organisations around the world to quickly find solutions to deforestation, with the ambition of “making the trees worth more alive than dead.”
That’s good. Actually, it’s great.
So why on God’s green earth did the Duchy of Cornwall, the Prince’s private estate, invest $113,500 in Sustainable Forestry Management Ltd, a “carbon credits” company based in Bermuda? Sustainable Forestry wanted to trade in carbon credits from rainforests. That means paying money to harvest rainforest trees.
They weren’t allowed to, so they started to lobby politicians. Prince Charles also made speeches criticising existing regulations and calling for a change in the rules to allow trading in rainforest carbon credits. Why would he set himself up to be the conservator of rainforests and then try to have that protection removed? What does that tell us?
“Charles has an overweening sense of privilege and entitlement, born of many years of being pampered with a level of personal service and comfort that have securely insulated him from the realities of normal life. He also has annoying habit, as The Economist recently noted, of “sounding off about a wide range of subjects about which he has more opinions than knowledge.”
Originally I posted this and I would like to thank one of my readers for showing me the last two lines were an inaccuracy. As a result I dug deeper and found a copy of the original article.
It really does pay to dig as deeply as possible and try to find the original source so as not to be caught out by fake news.
Judging by the news since New Year, 2018 will be full of claims of “record weather events” caused by “global warming.” Is it true, or is it an agenda?
Here’s a news report from 1922:
“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical changein climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone.
Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes.
Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.
Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north are being encountered.
The above part is true. You can read the entire article by clicking on the Anchorage Daily Times.
The part in red had been added to it, which I retract, although it is what the UN is claiming.
Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.”
* * * * * * * * * The report was from November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post – 96 years ago.
This must have been caused by the Model T Ford’s emissions.
Taxpayer funded climate-doomsday scientists and the mainstream media ambulance chasers perpetuate the myth that today’s severe weather events are a result of human-CO2 caused extreme climate change – actually, today’s bad weather seems rather mild to similar events decades before large human CO2 emissions.
My advice, turn your TV off and don’t be myth-taken. I wish you all the best for the New Year. Here’s some wisdom from the Bible:
“As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.” Genesis 8:22 (NIV)
See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ – Colossians 2:8.
Originally I posted this and I would like to thank one of my readers for showing me the last two lines were an inaccuracy. As a result I dug deeper and found a copy of the original article.
Red Sky in the morning 