censorship

The protest of 2022 and ordinary heroes

Today on my day off I’m remembering the protestors who occupied parliament grounds in Wellington from Waitangi Day on 6th February until the 2nd March 2022.

The message was to end the mandates – mandates that were ruled illegal in May 2021. Next minute the NZ government changed the law under urgency on May 18th 2021 in order to ram the mandates through on the populace.

Govt makes urgent law change after High Court ruling on legality of vaccine rollout

After that ordinary people had no recourse than to protest. The protestors fought the mandates on the grounds of parliament while the police and defence forces fought in the court. On February 27th 2022, two days before the protest was ended, the High Court overturned the Police and Defence vaccine mandates and the government faced a legal ultimatum to end mandates and vaccine passes immediately.

Is that why the New Zealand government evicted the protesters from parliament grounds three days later?

Govt faces legal ultimatum: End mandates and vaccine passes, now

Do we owe the protestors freedom from pharmaceutical and medical tyranny?

We went down to Wellington the day before it ended to see the protest for ourselves. It was nothing like we were shown on TV. The grounds were clean, it was peaceable, well ordered and the various groups were in harmony.

I saw the NZ National anthem acted out in front of us. I saw the bonds of love, with people of every creed and race coming together, praying for God to defend NZ. “From dissension, envy, hate, and corruption guard our state,” I heard them sing. I saw it first hand for myself, not through the media lens.

It was sad to see the protest portrayed in such a negative light by our government and media. I know we were turned off and our TV has never gone back on. Are you glad to see Newshub gone? Do you trust the news media?

Whether we agree with the Wellington protest or not, I think we all agree on free speech and not having our opinion shaped by the media.

Related post

Jacinda signals her masters after the protest

Who are the criminals in NZ?

This is what our mainstream news media are not covering. Whistle blower Barry Young has released data from the Ministry of Health, also known as Te Whatu Ora about deaths from the Covid vaccine.

Before leaking the data he contacted all the MPs in parliament, but no-one responded. There’s still no response.

“When you’re treated as a criminal for trying to report a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Barry Young (quoting Edward Snowden)

After the damning data release Te Whatu Ora are trying to put out the fire. Too late.

Te Whatu Ora was granted an urgent injunction on Friday to prevent the spread of the data, chief executive Margie Apa said.

Armed police surrounded Barry Young’s house following the police complaint from Te Whatu Ora. The police wanted him jailed without bail but it was granted providing he would be released the next day. ”The reason for the delayed release cannot be reported,” said the NZ Herald. 

The reason would have been to give police time to go through his office and access his computer. I think the wrong people are going to jail in NZ. 

WHISTLEBLOWER speaks out at NZ Parliament

Links

Te Whatu Ora employee charged with Covid-19 vaccination data breach granted bail

Why did some people experience adverse reactions to Covid vaccines and others didn’t? It could be the batch or the person who injected it, says British MP Andrew Bridgen. Bridgen says New Zealand government data reveals that at one vaccine location, 30 per cent of recipients died. The data is still being analysed for more insights to this increasingly catastrophic policy, he tells Fred Pawle.

NZ stats reveal lethal Covid batches: Andrew Bridgen

STEVE KIRSCH: On The NZ Whistleblower Data Exposure And The International Controversy That Followed

Was the Covid Whistleblower arrested for exposing the truth?

NZ Vaccine Data Whistleblower Could Face up to 7 Years in Prison.

Australia’s Dr Paul Oosterhuis (https://twitter.com/dragonfishy) analysed the data on New Zealand’s excess deaths from the Covid jabs.

M.O.A.R Data Analysis with Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Steve Kirsch: A Businessman’s Transparency and the Controversy Surrounding His C19 Data

Steve Kirsch, an American businessman, recently approached a board of UK politicians, showcasing his commitment to transparency by providing evidence of record-level data. However, his claims have faced criticism, with Wikipedia accusing him of being a conspiracy theorist and questioning the reliability of his data. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation, it is essential to examine Kirsch’s video presentation and form our own opinions.

https://www.facebook.com/aussienewstonight/videos/1191975131762933/

Dr Paul Oosterhuis speech in support of Barry Young

A censored dream from 2009

Can you think of an elephant in the nation’s living room right now? They’re trying to hide the elephant but it’s getting glaringly obvious when they start censoring dreams. I can even tell you the colour of the elephant. Can you see it? I believe it’s a white elephant.

It’s a better analogy than us getting a lemon because elephants are huge.

Two years after the Covid vaccine rollout no-one’s talking about the elephant except to say they’re fed up and not getting any more booster shots. Pfizer should have been called Pfizzer or Fizzer because everyone caught Covid. It turns out Pfizer released something they didn’t know would work.

Senior Pfizer executive Janine Small admitted that the drug company did not know whether its Covid vaccine prevented transmission of the virus when it began rolling out the shots globally.

Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout, executive admits.

Small said they had to move at the “speed of science.” What is that exactly? Here’s a definition from Twitter I like –

“The velocity at which money flows from government bank accounts into the accounts of pharmaceutical company accounts.”

Source: Thomas Gatliff, Twitter.

Meanwhile we’re left picking up the pieces while we try to go back to “normal” amidst health problems, business failures, a fractured society and wrecked economy.

Is this Orwellian mandated nightmare over or will the globalists (UN, WHO and WEF) be back for more? I don’t think they can try the same thing again.

Only God knows. Does he reveal things to those who will listen?

Now let me tell you about the censored dream given to a young woman in 2009.

This dream was years before the so-called Covid vaccine. I’m left asking why it the dream was expunged from Youtube. Was it too close to the truth?

I’ve picked the dream up to rebroadcast.

I don’t get dreams very often, normally I get details to report on.

The details are in my earlier blog posts.

In 2019, just prior to the Coronavirus panic of 2020 God warned me about a Digital ID the technocrats were planning. It was called ID2020. The room where they met at the UN had something on the wall like a woman reaching for a vulture. Then I was warned about a dress rehearsal for their pandemic called Event201. It was brazenly posted about by the World Economic Forum in this video.

In October 2019 the attendees were even given a Coronavirus plushie cushion! Imagine that. What does that remind you of? Shall we put it in the room with the elephant?

Which is better, dreams or details? I wish I could find the dreamer from 2009.

Were we warned?

The Bible does speak of God warning people in dreams.

For God does speak—now one way, now another—
    though no one perceives it.
In a dream, in a vision of the night,
    when deep sleep falls on people
    as they slumber in their beds,
he may speak in their ears
    and terrify them with warnings,
to turn them from wrongdoing
    and keep them from pride,
to preserve them from the pit,
    their lives from perishing by the sword.

Job 33:14-18

Links

The dream was originally published on a Youtube page JesusISComingRUReady.

Dream of forced vaccination

How to break the mandates

I was talking to a man last night who is doing his best to warn his children about the mandates, but they’re not listening, despite all his Facebook posts.

What to do? I read a great article by Julius Ruechel, The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell.

It’s a long article, here’s what I’ve gleaned;

We have to plant a seed of doubt. Data is not going to speak to a frightened mind, people will only look for that after they start questioning the government’s narrative.

Doubt leads the mind to seek out data, not the other way around. The regime is doing everything it can to prevent the fearful from thinking. This is a psychological war.

To plant a seed of doubt, to help people take that first step, it is not what we say that matters so much as being seen to say it, out loud, in public, in a way that allows you to be identified and counted, and being willing to face the music when the world can see what you really think. And saying it over and over again, relentlessly, until enough voices join in, until the counter chorus can no longer be dismissed as fringe. Doubt is created by breaking the illusion of consensus.

The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell

The NZ Government creates the illusion of consensus by referring to us as the “team of 5 million.” In New Zealand the convoy and the presence of the North Island protesters at parliament and South Island protesters at Picton is breaking that illusion.

Remember Hans Christian Andersen’s folk tale? It was a child speaking up about the emperor having no clothes that broke the spell. “All it took was a pointed finger, a well-timed laugh, and the courage to speak out.”

Doubt can also be created when someone’s personal experience doesn’t match the propaganda that they’ve been fed.

Many only started to ask questions after being required to get their booster shots.

As they begin to feel safe, they regain their ability to think, which gives rise to questions and doubts. The regime does not want people to regain their ability to see clearly and think independently. They’re trying to stoke hysteria about the unvaccinated and keep the vaccinated in fear with never ending variants in order to keep control.

We have to understand the long game that is being played. Our freedom is being removed incrementally, one piece at a time. Our disapproval is irrelevant unless we say it out loud and take a stand. Visibility. Letters, petitions, Facebook posts and press releases, these avenues are all in the same realm as the data. They will be dismissed until after the spell begins to break.

Break the illusion of consensus

Currently the regime is manufacturing an illusion of consensus to use herd instinct as a means of control. Breaking the illusion of consensus is what will give us the power to force the herd to think for itself. That is why it is so important that the silent good people speak out.

Change always starts from the fringes; change begins with a committed minority that refuses to be cowed.

Once an idea is adopted by 10% of the population, research shows that this is the psychological tipping point when ideas, opinions, or beliefs will be rapidly adopted by the rest of the population.  A noisy 10% is all it takes. Our freedom is not as far out of reach as you may think.

But it has a best-before date if the silent good people wait too long before speaking out.

It is the absence of noise, not the clash of swords, that marks the sound of liberty slipping away. 

Recognizing that the emperor has no clothes is not enough. People also have to be willing to say it out loud. That second point is currently our weakest link in this psychological war. 

Push the regime

When an authoritarian regime seeks to consolidate its power, there is a point of no return when no amount of dissent can stand up to the entrenched might of the juggernaut. The race is on between the regime’s ability to consolidate its power and those on our side to build up the courage to publicly express dissent.

The real heroes in this battle are the millions of citizens who come out from behind a veil of anonymity, at home, at work, with friends, with family and neighbors to add their voices to the counter chorus. Their words are not important. A joke, a meme, or the courage to whisper “bullshit” is all that it takes. Saying it publicly is all that matters. 

We need to push the regime to move further and faster as it feels its hold over the crowd begin to slip. We need to goad it into eroding its support base by overplaying its hand.

The regime can only push people into a corner for so long. It can only cry “variant” for so long before the effect wears out. We are neither a tame nor a broken people, yet. All we need to do is refuse to shut up (which breaks no laws) in order to force the regime into taking self-defeating measures. Its grip is slipping, and the crowd’s patience is wearing thin.

When the mood of the crowd turns, it will be sudden. We can win this game, easily, but only if the silent good people already on our side step out of the shadows to join our counter-chorus. Once the crowd is ours, the rest will happen all on its own.

By refusing to submit, by fighting them at any cost, on principle, it raises the cost for any tyrant who preys on the freedoms of others.

Force their hand

The official narrative is rapidly dissolving, rendering the fascism of the New Normal visible. This is happening now because those of us who have seen it from the beginning — and have been resisting it all along — have held out long enough to run out the clock. GloboCap can’t keep the narrative going, so all they have left is brute fascist force.

We need to make GloboCap deploy that force, and to shine a big, bright spotlight on it, as the truckers and protesters in Ottawa have just done. In case anyone is confused about the tactic, it’s called classic non-violent civil disobedience. I described it in a recent column:

“In other words, we need to make GloboCap (and its minions) go openly totalitarian … because it can’t. If it could, it would have done so already. Global capitalism cannot function that way. Going openly totalitarian will cause it to implode … no, not global capitalism itself, but this totalitarian version of it. In fact, this is starting to happen already. It needs the simulation of ‘reality,’ and ‘democracy,’ and ‘normality,’ to keep the masses docile. So we need to attack that simulation. We need to hammer on it until it cracks, and the monster hiding within in appears. That is the weakness of the system … New Normal totalitarianism will not work if the masses perceive it as totalitarianism, as a political/ideological program, rather than as a response to a deadly pandemic.”

The Naked Face Of New Normal Fascism
by Tyler Durden

Principles

Principles are a philosophical safety mechanism that protects society by raising the price for tyrants who would otherwise steal our freedoms through a thousand tiny slices. 

The fact that our freedoms are currently under attack is an indication that the tyrants believe there are not enough principled men and women left who are willing to push back, on principle. So far, they are right. It’s time to prove them wrong and raise the price of their tyranny. It’s time for the silent good people to break their silence, at any cost, on principle.

This lovely man is 80 years old and he saluted for the full half hour length of the convoy, apparently, as it passed through Wanganui.
Photo – Donna Henton

All governments rule through the consent of the crowd, including tyrannies. You don’t have to like what they do. You just have to comply. Saying nothing legitimizes each baby step towards full blown tyranny.

Freedom is not granted by governments. Freedom is earned by crowds willing to defend it for themselves, for their neighbors, for their peers, and for their children. On principle.

To sum up, I believe it’s not too late, we can win. To fight back, we need to

  • plant a seed of doubt, break the illusion of consensus
  • speak out publicly, protest, poke fun at the regime. Use jokes, memes, call it for what it is, “bullshit.”
  • push the regime, force their hand
  • act on our principles, do not comply.

Links

The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell

A large, Pfizer rat

2021 is the Year of the Rat and last night I dreamed of one – a large, fat, well-fed rat.

“What could it mean?” I wondered.

I’ve just watched this in my lunch hour. Can you smell the rat?

Pfizer Whistleblower Leaks Execs Emails: ‘We Want to Avoid Having Info on Fetal Cells Out There’

It turns out Pfizer are using aborted fetal cell lines in the testing of their so-called vaccine, and they don’t want us to know, as they don’t want us getting a religious exemption against their mandatory vaccine.

Here’s the rat running away.

Pfizer’s Chief Scientific Officer Philip Dormitzer Questioned by Project Veritas Over Leaked Emails

I can’t imagine this staying up for long so I’ve downloaded the videos. If deleted, I will put them back up on an alternative platform.

Questions the NZ media are not asking

For those living in NZ, affected by the lock downs, do you ever watch the daily Covid updates from the government and media? I don’t because the media never ask the questions I want asked.

Lynda Wharton of the NZ Heath Forum has the same questions, after making this observation about the NZ media;

“New Zealand has no independent “fourth estate”, demanding honesty and transparency from power. 
No discerning, educated, passionate, ballsy, annoying (to the politicians) interrogator asking the questions that force a mantle of accountability onto sometimes sloping shoulders.

I long ago stopped watching the 1pm updates.  I literally feel my pulse pounding in my temples if i bear witness to the journalist “questioning” that never strays from the straight and narrow paths of masks, lockdowns and a “safe and effective” holy grail found at the point of a needle.

So here, on a reflective Sunday morning, are the questions I would be asking had my dream to be a journalist come true…

Dear Prime Minister..
1) Why are we still using a PCR test amplified to 40 or 45 cycles to “test” for Covid, when we know (and the CDC and WHO have informed us) that such testing is fraught with a huge majority of false positives?
2) Why did the NZ Government remove our ability to access antibody testing through local labs, at the outset of the pandemic?  (This means we are unable to test to determine if we have naturally occurring immunity from previous exposure or infection).
3) Why is our Medical Council putting the fear of God into any doctor who wishes to prescribe “Mr Ivor Mick Tin” for “off label” prevention or treatment of Covid?  And why are those New Zealanders who have been reduced to importing from overseas, seeing their precious package thrown into the bin at NZ customs?
4) Why are you refusing to discuss the reality of what you are seeing in countries around the world, with New Zealanders?  Why are you not telling them about Israel, UK and USA, where the most heavily Vd populations in the world are seeing massive outbreaks and huge numbers hospitalised and dying….despite at least 2 and now 3 jabs?
5) Why are you not telling New Zealanders that the Vd are highly likely the “super spreaders” now.  With their massive viral load when infected, combined with reduced symptoms when infected, they will go about their lives, out and about and infecting others.
6) Why are you not using your 1pm updates to remind clinicians that ALL changes in health in the weeks following the jab MUST be reported to CARM….as this is a drug that has only provisional consent, and no long history of proof of safety or efficacy.
7) Why are you not helping New Zealanders understand that this is not “just another jab”.  That many of the 58 questions to Pfizer, (including numerous safety and purity questions) asked by Medsafe, remain unanswered, despite the millions of doses now administered here.
8) Why is our Academia not publicly debating ANY of the many issues under scrutiny in far flung corners of the world….including the growing proof of a rapid antibody decline in the few months post jab….setting the stage for the very real concern of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (e.g. the jab changing your immune system in a way which allows the virus easier entry to cells, and a catastrophic immune response).
9) Why are our medical practitioners not calling YOU to account over the millions of severe post V injuries now recorded in databases around the world (VAERS, Yellow Card UK, VigiAccess etc)….and the tens of thousands of post V deaths.
10)  Why do our people live in abject terror of Covid?  So many believe that if they catch it it is tantamount to a death sentence.  Virtually no one understands that mortality is strongly skewed to the elderly and comorbid….and that your average healthy under 60 year old is likely to experience a “bad flu” (or less).

11) Why…when your mantra is “be kind”, are you turning Kiwis against Kiwis?

Your own partner implored us, just this week, to pressure, cajole, punish, separate and do whatever else it takes to get someone over the jab line.



12) Why, when 30,000 anguished comments landed on your face book call out for “adverse reactions”….did you simply have them wiped away with a click of a button, like dog dirt on the sole of your favourite shoes?
13) Why are our children now being lined up for the V, with NO discussion, debate, or public consultation, such as we have seen in many other corners of the world?  Instead being presented as an obvious, commonsense “fait accompli”, which it most clearly is not.
14) Why are parents not given the information they need to make an INFORMED consent for their precious children….and while we are on that subject, how come our scatty, pubescent 12 year olds are deemed fit to make that choice FOR THEMSELVES EVEN OVERRIDING PARENTAL OPPOSITION.

Dear Prime Minister….I could literally monopolise your 1pm update from now to Christmas, but in the interest of my own sanity i will stop here.
I live in hope that one day, just ONE member of the New Zealand press will have the courage to step up and ask you even ONE of these questions.”

– Lynda Wharton, NZ Heath Forum


Note:- For those on Facebook who would like to join the NZ Heath Forum, it’s an invite only group. If you want to join, copy and paste the link to the group into a message to them, and then answer their questions.


Another questionabout deaths from Delta compared to deaths from Pfizer.

The media have breathlessly announced two deaths from the Delta variant, one was in their nineties and the other had a pre-existing condition.

Why are the government and media so worried about a two deaths from a weak variant of the Covid virus SARS-COV2 virus while ignoring 28 deaths from the vaccine?

Here are Medsafe’s injury and mortality figures from Pfizer, up to 4th September 2021:

  • 602 serious Adverse Effects Following Immunisation (AEFI)
  • 28 deaths are from the vaccine.

The figures are spun so that you have to deduct them from the total, for example Medsafe writes it as, “26 of these deaths are unlikely related to the COVID-19 vaccine.” That means 28 deaths are caused by the vaccine.

There will be more deaths, preventable if people had informed consent and could do a proper risk / benefit analysis of the risk of the illness versus the risk of vaccine harm.

Here’s the link to Medsafe’s website:

Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines: Safety Report #27 – 4 September 2021

Holy Toledo, God and BLM

In 2020 Black Lives Matter protesters called for the removal of Winston Churchill’s monument, standing in Parliament Square, London. It is located on a spot referred to in the 1950s by Churchill as “where my statue will go”. Perhaps in their ignorance they don’t know that this leader is a defender of the free world who helped defeat the Nazis.

There was a furious argument over him and amidst that controversy, Google removed Churchill’s picture from their list of British Prime Ministers. His image was replaced by a grey silhouette. Google said the error had occurred when it tried to change the photo. What bad timing for that to happen!

Did the unravelling begin with Obama? He started his presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office. The Washington Post stated that clearly, Obama misunderstood the symbolism of removing the bust from the Oval Office and was embarrassed to admit it.

President Trump restored the bust to the Oval Office and the Biden administration wasted no time in removing it again. Perhaps Biden doesn’t get it either. Something’s ‘gone bust’ at the Whitehouse.

The culture war hasn’t ended there. Recently, Winston Churchill’s portrait was removed from a corridor at the New Zealand parliament by the NZ Green party as the Greens didn’t like him. I can hazard a guess as to why – he would have fought against them and their corrosive influence.

Why did this culture war erupt in the midst of Covid-19? Why the strident call for books and statues of white men to be removed?

It’s like they’re all executing a script, to remove monuments to heroes and replace them with God knows what.

I wonder what the Almighty does think of all of this?

A mural honouring the life and legacy of George Floyd, a criminal whose sad death was the spark for the Black Lives Matter protests, was erected in Toledo, Ohio. Unfortunately it was destroyed by a bolt of lightning.

Holy Toledo.

The murals on each size were untouched.

Perhaps God hated it because ALL LIVES MATTER, from heroes like Winston Churchill right down to little people who are not famous but battle life every day.

Links

George Floyd Mural Struck By Lightning In Toledo, Ohio

Google: Missing Churchill photo mystery explained

National leader Judith Collins lashes out at Greens over shifting of Winston Churchill painting in Parliament

Image of Sir Winston Churchill disappears from Google amid rising cancel-culture tensions

Here’s the real story about the Churchill bust in the Oval Office

Biden administration defends removing Churchill statue from Oval Office

Related Posts:

The attack on our culture doesn’t end there. They also had a go at Dr Seuss: Diversity, disrespect and Dr Seuss

Lockdown Knockdown

My daughter and I were travelling down the Auckland motorway for my cancer treatment a few months ago when I spied some guys on an overhead bridge holding a sign saying “lockdowns don’t work.” They saw me wave and cheer as the car approached. I’ve never agreed with these constant lock downs.

We’ve been told through slogans and mantras that the reason for the lock downs is to “unite against Covid” and to “stay home, save lives.”

Is that really the reason?

Well not according to The European Commission.

We were to remain susceptible to infection so the roll-out of the planned mass immunisation programme could take place before we all had a chance to mount a natural immune response.

Here it is in their own words.

5. It would be possible to vaccinate on a large scale.

Once an mRNA vaccine has been approved, which could take 12-18 months, it should be easy to scale up production. Because the manufacturing process is shorter than for other vaccines – Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding estimates a few months rather than 1-2 years for conventional vaccines – there is potential for these vaccines to be scaled up quickly. This is useful in the context of coronavirus, which will likely need mass immunisation programmes.

‘I think we will need a very high population coverage, but it depends a little bit on the countries and the epidemiology,’ said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding. ‘In the countries where coronavirus has been spreading very fast, we also expect that there’s many people who have been in contact with the virus and who have actually mounted a natural immune response. But on the other hand, if you look at Germany, for example, right now we’re all at home, barred, and not allowed to leave the house except for necessities.

The population therefore remains susceptible to infection, she says. ‘And so here, you would definitely need to think about vaccinating the whole population.

‘That’s why also these vaccines are of interest, because you could probably manage that, while, with other vaccines, it’s harder to produce these quantities (in a short period of time).’

EU Horizon, the EU Research & Innovation Magazine, Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines

Seven months after that article was written, The EU purchased 300 million doses of the vaccine as soon as it became available. Herd immunity would have ruined that vaccine market, their plans for Immunisation 2030 (IA2030) and their phase 3 mRNA trial mentioned in “4. There are a lot of unknowns,” where humans are the guinea pigs.

The cabal in charge of our governments didn’t want to keep us safe, they wanted to keep us susceptible.

The reason our governments are marketing and mandating these so-called vaccines is because they know they only have about two years before we all develop herd immunity.

The message is that we now need vaccines to develop this. That is why the World Health Organisation changed the definition of “herd immunity.” (See below)

If I’ve read this wrong please tell me. This is the 19th day of my fourth lockdown and I am angry. We’re locked up while our business is being affected and our human rights removed for a mass immunisation agenda. Please share this widely. Let me know if the link gets removed, I’ve downloaded the web page.

Links

Dr Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding Member of the IMI Scientific Committee and head of Microbiology at Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany. Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines

The EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine on 9th November 2020 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “90%” effective. What’s Not Being Said About Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine

Herd Immunity: The definition of herd immunity was changed by the WHO sometime between June 9th and November 13th, 2020,

Wayback machine, WHO former definition of herd immunity

You can read the new WHO definition here. Herd immunity is altered so that it can now only be achieved through mass vaccination;

“To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population. One of the aims with working towards herd immunity is to keep vulnerable groups who cannot get vaccinated (e.g. due to health conditions like allergic reactions to the vaccine) safe and protected from the disease.”

WHO, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity

If this was true, how come the world got over the Spanish Flu in two years? It’s obvious that the unscientific, untrustworthy World Health Organisation has been corrupted by the vaccine cabal.

Now we can see why the Great Barrington Declaration, written on October 4, 2020 by three of the world’s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the vulnerable and minimizing harms to society, has been met with such venom.

WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website

The Narrow Window

According to the World Economic Forum, COVID-19 is part of the four building blocks of the Great Reset. Is this a future we all want? Top down rule from an unelected elite?

The WEF is mostly known for its an annual meeting at the end of January in Davos. When you hear the Davos men say “build back better,” they’re using one of the slogans.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world,” said Klaus Schwab, founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum. Prince Charles said this is “a golden opportunity.”

WEF, The Great Reset

Mandated mask wearing, vaccines and Covid passports will be part of it unless we all push back.

WEF, COVID-19: The 4 building blocks of the Great Reset

BBC News: What is the Great Reset – and how did it get hijacked by conspiracy theories?

Resistance in the face of censorship

The risks of the Covid vaccine are not being reported in our media.

Not only that, the media attack by giving us people who are questioning the need for a Covid vaccine by giving us a label, disparaging us as “deniers’ and questioning our intelligence, This has been done by people in the media like Hilary Barry. Then we don’t need to be censored, we’ve already been undermined.

People are fighting back in an effort to reach New Zealanders to let them know about safety concerns with the Covid Vax.

Not all media platforms are closed, I am using my blog to get the news out. I have tried to talk about my safety concerns on Facebook community forums, but it got so nasty I won’t do it again.

Here, New Zealanders are holding up a series of yellow signs on busy intersections and roads. These guys are my heroes.

To prove my point about censorship, the video clip only lasted on Youtube for one day!

But don’t worry, here it is on Bitchute:

New Zealand paving the way with this new awareness activity…

Thanks Youtube for making my point.

Links

To illustrate my point about our hostile media, who are supposed to serve us and be our eyes and ears:-

Hilary Barry had a complaint made against her for her comments below – which she was allowed to get away with. So the media can say what they want with impunity.

“The Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) has not upheld a complaint about an item on Seven Sharp in which co-host Hilary Barry made comments about the safety of the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine and “anti-vaxxers”.

The comments included a suggestion those who do not want to be vaccinated could “jump on a ferry and go to the Auckland Islands for a few years…then when we’ve got rid of COVID…come back”.

The complaint alleged these comments breached the good taste and decency, discrimination and denigration, balance, accuracy and fairness standards, by suggesting the vaccine’s safety was almost without question, and denigrating those with a different view.”

BSA finds comments on COVID-19 vaccine safety and ‘anti-vaxxers’ did not breach standards


How can you form an opinion if you’re denied the facts?

Here’s Dr Roger Hodkinson – July 2021 : telling the truth about the PCR Tests (95% false positives), the drivers of fear (the mainstream media), physicians who are violating the oath to do no harm, the trampling of the right to informed consent, and the actions of the politicians and the unelected minions underneath them.

It (the truth) can only get out onto alternative media, and how many people listen to that?”

Diversity, disrespect and Dr Seuss

The 2nd March is Theodor Seuss Geisel’s birthday, the author of the Dr Seuss books. It’s also ‘Read Across America Day.’ For many Americans, Read Across America Day is celebrated alongside Geisel’s birthday.

But Dr Seuss has fallen out of favour.

This year Joe Biden, unlike presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama, left Dr. Seuss out when he observed ‘Read Across America Day.’

The Read Across America organisation have announced they’re no longer synonymous with Dr. Seuss, they’re diversifying. From the fourteen themes on their site, six of those themes deal with agendas: 26 books are on activism, 33 on identity, 13 on immigration, 6 on LGBTQ, 30 on Racial and social justice, and 26 on Trauma. Why can’t they let kids be kids? I thought a good book was something to escape into! Kids today have got enough to deal with, without having to read about trauma, activism or sexual confusion.

As for the themes, there’s no white people on their page, except for a lesbian couple! There’s no men either. Books by Theme

I’ve taken a screenshot. This is March, 2021. Will the theme change, or will the culture war prevail?

To add insult to injury, Dr. Seuss was accused of racism. Six books won’t be published anymore because, according to Dr Seuss Enterprises, they portray people in ‘hurtful and wrong’ ways. The books are: And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street, If I Ran the Zoo, McElligot’s Pool, On Beyond Zebra!, Scrambled Eggs Super!, and The Cat’s Quizzer

Geisel understood racism, having gone through World War 1 in America with German parents. He wrote four books about tolerance, diversity, and compromise, The Sneetches and Other Stories.

I think diversity meant something different back in the 1950s.

Ridiculous: How Dr. Seuss Enterprises Caved to the Outrageous Shrieks of the Woke Mob.

The Baltimore Sun: Some Dr. Seuss books were pulled by his estate and a ‘cancel culture’ backlash erupted.

After hearing the news of the book banning, the first thing I did was look to see if I could get the books, but as I expected the values have sky rocketed. I did manage to download and read the eBooks, if you want them ask and I’ll send you the links.

Here are a couple of protest poems that are currently circulating around the internet. I don’t know who the authors are, but they echo my feelings. Anyway, enjoy or come and share my sympathies.

Alas they’ve come for Dr. SEUSS, they wish to hang him with a noose.

They claim his tales were racist bent, they judged him fast, missed what he meant.

But if we look inside his tales, you’ll find the balance of the scales.

Remember when Horton heard a Who, and we heard the wisdom of the Lorax too.

The lesson behind Green Eggs and Ham, that changed the mind of Sam I am.

Remember too the rotten Grinch, who once would never give an inch.

He taught us lessons, one and all, boys and girls, big and small.

So if you’ve judged his works as poor, you should re- read them, I implore.

The man we know as Dr. SEUSS, turned our imaginations loose.

His impact was beyond compare, he taught us it was good to care.

To accept the red, the blue, the green, and on each other we can lean.

So if you still won’t give an inch, your heart has hardened like the Grinch.

Release the grudge, the hate, the rue, and embrace the hope of Cindy Lou.


Tintin

I found this article a week later while looking at an unrelated subject. I could agree with the progressives having a problem with Tintin, the book is undeniably racist. But it’s popular in the Congo!

The Racist Tintin Book That’s Massively Popular In The Congo


And this from April 19th 2021 …

Dr Seuss Enterprises Threatens to Sue The Babylon Bee

Really? The Babylon Bee is a satirical site. Their response was, “Unfortunately for them (Seuss Enterprises), this piece was a work of satire, which is fair use. We will not be taking it down the way they took down several of their own, perfectly harmless titles to score worthless virtue points with insatiable leftists.”