predictions

“Chicken Little” and the news from 1922 OR it pays to dig deeper

Chicken littleOriginally I posted this and I would like to thank one of my readers for showing me the last two lines were an inaccuracy.  As a result I dug deeper and found a copy of the original article.

It really does pay to dig as deeply as possible and try to find the original source so as not to be caught out by fake news.


Judging by the news since New Year, 2018 will be full of claims of “record weather events” caused by “global warming.”  Is it true, or is it an agenda?  

Here’s a news report from 1922:

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in
some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report
to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway

Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north
as 81 degrees 29 minutes.

Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.

Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones,
the report continued, while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.

Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north are being encountered.


The above part is true.  You can read the entire article by clicking on the Anchorage Daily Times.

The part in red had been added to it, which I retract, although it is what the UN is claiming.

Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.”

* * * * * * * * *
The report was from November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post – 96 years ago.

This must have been caused by the Model T Ford’s emissions.

arctic-temperature-zone-adt-1922

Headline from 1922


And now for that facts …

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

Govt funded scam science

Why is fake news always bad?  Here’s the good news:

Despite What You’ve Heard, Global Warming Isn’t Making Weather More Extreme.


Extreme Climate Change: The 1933-1938 Period Was One of Very Severe Weather Events, Including Global Heat Waves.

Taxpayer funded climate-doomsday scientists and the mainstream media ambulance chasers perpetuate the myth that today’s severe weather events are a result of human-CO2 caused extreme climate change – actually, today’s bad weather seems rather mild to similar events decades before large human CO2 emissions.

Climate change is a hoax

My advice, turn your TV off and don’t be myth-taken.  I wish you all the best for the New Year.  Here’s some wisdom from the Bible:

 “As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.” Genesis 8:22 (NIV)

See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ – Colossians 2:8.

Freedom, 2018

The world in 2015?

Economist cover 2015Well, here’s an odd cover from the Economist to start 2015 off.  Who is the Economist, and why did they produce this cover?  Do they make predictions, or do they cause them?

First off, the Economist is partially owned by members of the Rothschild Banking family of England.

The Economist claims that it “is not a chronicle of economics”.  Rather, it aims “to take part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress”.  It takes an editorial stance of classical liberalism and economic liberalism which is supportive of free trade, globalisation, free immigration and cultural liberalism (such as supporting legal recognition for same-sex marriage).  Source: Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist

Their kind of economic and cultural liberalism is wrecking countries and cultures, as they work towards their goal of a new world order.  Unfortunately it seems the majority of the world leaders are working for them and have been for some time.  Liberalism hates boundaries.

No doubt the people behind the Economist believe that they are the intelligent ones; and that is why their people on the cover are in black and white, versus the people in colour “obstructing their progress”.

We have Alice in Wonderland facing the leaders.   “Curiouser and Curiouser”, as Alice said.

Angela Merkel's handsThe German Chancellor Angela Merkel is making an interesting sign with her hands.  Does anyone know what that sign is?  Is it related to Freemasonry?  It’s a sign she makes often – so often there was a giant poster of them in Berlin.  I gather “guten handen” would be “good hands”. Really?

Pro-Deutschland-protest-August-2012At the time of writing this, Angela Merkel has insisted that “Islam belongs to Germany,” as she attempts to rein in a growing German protest movement against Islamisation.

If that were true, what boundaries will there be to protect the culture and religion in Germany (and Europe) against mosques, sharia law, a demographic time bomb and Islam’s aspirations?  What should she be reining in?

I don’t believe the protesters will be listened to.  They’ll be labelled “right-wing” and racist, and they’ll  be equated with Nazis.  Is Germany really in “good hands?”  Is Merkel serving the German people, or a hidden agenda belonging to the Globalists?

Lastly we have two arrows next to a pile of dirt with 11.5 and 11.3 on them, right in front of Alice in Wonderland.  Goodness knows what that represents.  I hope it’s not related to that awful depiction of the two-faced world and the mushroom cloud.  No doubt we’ll find out.  Sigh.

The Vigilant Citizen gives the other symbols a closer scrutiny, if you are interested;
http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/economist-2015-cover-filled-cryptic-symbols-dire-predictions/