New Zealand

Double-speak?

Before she was sworn in as prime minister, Ardern talked about wanting her Government to feel different. “I want people to feel that it’s open, that it’s listening and that it’s going to bring kindness back,” she said.  It sounds great after three decades of austerity and neo-liberalism. 

Jacinda Adern knows how to be appealing, her qualification is in public relations, and she’s good at it, very glib and quick with empathy and talking points.

I know these are unprecedented times, but Jacinda did talk about being known by deeds, so let’s look at those deeds.  If you don’t like bad news, click on the Time cover, read all the lovely things the globalist media have to say about Jacinda, and go no further.  If you believe in accountability, read on.

Jacinda Arden Time

From the 26th March, New Zealand was wrapped in Covid-19 yellow tape when a level 4 lock down was imposed.  On the advice of the health ministers, NZ should only have gone to level 2 for a month – but we didn’t.  Instead, just three days later, the Government moved to Level 3, and in another two days went to Level 4.

The lock down was done illegally and the government and police knew that.  Leaked emails showed that police believed, on the advice from Crown Law that there was very little they could do, other than ask people nicely to comply with the edicts.  Yet businesses were closed on Police orders, and shopkeepers were threatened with arrest – all without any legal basis.

The term for this is “ultra vires,”  a Latin phrase for “an act which requires legal authority but is done without it.”

UltraViresImage

Worst of all, people were made to die alone.  I’m not talking about Covid deaths.  The Ministry of Health failed to allow for their own legal directive that allowed for compassionate grounds and exception circumstances in allowing people to visit dying relatives.

“Where is my boy, where is my boy?” a dying father asked.  His son, one of the 24 declined relatives, had to go to the High Court to gain access to his father.  Justice Tracey Walker, the judge that ruled Oliver Christiansen could leave quarantine to see his father, said the health officials’ decisions to decline permission were legally flawed.  In her decision released on Friday, Justice Walker said the handling of Christiansen’s case “had the hallmarks of an automatic rejection.”

Man in quarantine appeals to Government to see dying wife

Covid 19 coronavirus: Kiwi in LA begs for quarantine exemption to see dying dad in Christchurch

Denied visits for dying relatives: support for reviews of decisions

There had been 24 requests to visit a relative dying or close to dying as of April 30, a spokesperson for the prime minister said.   None of those requests were granted by the Ministry of Health, but while people died alone in the midst of this lock down, the Minister of Health went on a mountain bike ride, a drive to the beach and moved house.

New Zealand health minister demoted after beach visit broke lockdown rules

It was also turned into a nation of snitches after a hotline was setup for COVID-19 compliance.  Ardern minions have filed “4,200 reports to police”, reporting on their neighbours who breach New Zealand’s house arrest rules.  As The NZ Herald quipped, “curtain-twitchers outing members of the public crashed the new police reporting site within an hour of it going live yesterday.” Neighbour devouring neighbour under a cloud of suspicion and fear, in an eerie echo of the kind of public denouncing, carried out by Soviet Stasi, and Nazi Gestapo, collaborators.

The document dump

The fact that top health officials had recommended New Zealand move to Alert Level 2, and remain there for up to 30 days was revealed in the document dump that happened late of Friday afternoon of the 8th May.

Dumping documents late in the week is a long used practice of avoiding scrutiny, as Ministers head home for the weekend.  The hope and intention is that media attention will have largely moved on by the following Monday.

While this was done, Adern slapped a gag order on her ministers. Newshub was leaked an internal memo sent to all ministers from the Prime Minister’s office instructing them not to speak to the media about the document dump.

The COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill

Despite Adern’s review of the legally flawed decisions where family members were denied access to their dying relatives, the Minister of Health has been granted unbridled power.  New Zealand has essentially been turned into a police state.

Hours before New Zealand moved to lock down level 2 on the 14th May, the COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill was rammed through Parliament, granting police or “enforcement officers” the right to come into a home or place of business without a warrant if they reasonably believe virus-related orders are being breached.  The wording of the bill may lead to mandated forced vaccinations.  It was done in less than two days and with no select committee hearings.

Covid-19 Health bill

These are the facts.  Now for my opinion.  “Know us by our deeds,” said Jacinda Adern a year after Christchurch.  She loves to be inclusive and say “us.”  Who is “us?”

The only thing I’d agree with Adern on is that her government feels different.  It certainly does.  There’s been no kindness.  To me, the Orwellian term “double-speak” comes to mind.

As Jordan Peterson well articulates, “Kindness is the excuse that social justice warriors use when they want to exercise control over what other people think and say.”

You know what it looks like to me?  A socialist working in cahoots with complicit, corporate owned media to get mandated vaccines for Agenda 2030.

Call me a conspiracy theorist all you like – I want to be wrong!


Links and leaks

Illegality:
LEAKED: Crown Law Advice to Police

New Zealand’s own Amy Brooke has penned a damning critique of Ardern’s so-called “kindness:” Speccy Puts the Boot into the Princess
Ardern’s much-vaunted “compassion” didn’t extend to the families of the ill and dying, either.

Coronavirus: Jacinda Ardern asks for review of all cases where family members were denied permission to visit relatives  (Wasn’t her carefree health minister reporting to her?)

Jacinda, house arrest

New Zealanders begin to devour each other while Jacinda Ardern smiles and waves at the nation she’s put under house arrest

Covid-19 coronavirus: Kiwis file 4200 reports to police of people flouting lockdown

Gagging ministers:

Doublespeak document dump while schooling Ministers on avoiding accountability

Leak: PM gags ministers on COVID-19 response

Creating a police state:

Even the UN Human Rights Commission is deeply concerned about COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill


I’m reminded of a song by ACDC; ‘Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.’  (ACDC’s album cover shows people with their eyes covered.)

Keeping faith with New Zealand?

Jacinda Adern has been praised for her empathetic leadership during this Covid-19 crisis.  Should she be?  Who has she been kind to?  Why is she giving arbitrary orders to NZ that are at odds with the government’s instructions to the Police? 

Adern said that under the Covid-19 level 2 rules, there could not be more than ten people in a place of worship.  But yesterday, on the 20th May, a leaked Police document showed that places of worship can be open with a limit of 100 people.  What’s going on?  The inconsistency hasn’t been reported by the media.  Where are the reporters demanding an explanation?

You might not care about faith, but ask yourself, who is she going to discriminate against next?

I’m going to call this a big, sloppy, steaming pile of bovine excrement.  We should pray for the government, but keep faith with a higher agency.  Perhaps the churches should meet in bars.  Bars are allowed 100 people.

Sign of the times

The NZ police can’t shut a church down – it will be going against their guidelines!

Leaked Police doc

 


Links: This is just in after my blog post yesterday.  It’s good to see at least one media outlet finally reporting on this.

Covid-19: Police give green-light to large church services, contradicting PM’s stance

Join the dots – Jacinda Adern, the WHO and Agenda 2030

For those wondering why Jacinda Adern passed the Covid-19 Health Response Bill, granting herself power that no political leader should have, here’s the clip of her selling NZ to the UN.  I’ve been watching her and keeping tabs on the Agenda 2030 stuff.  Here she is, in her own words, talking about the Sustainable Development Goals.

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (4 minutes)

I’ve put the contents of her speech in the notes section.  Unfortunately, comments have been disabled but you can express your feelings with like or dislike.  Me, I wish they had a ‘hate’ button.

“Leaving no one behind,” Adern says in her speech.  That’s interesting, that’s just what the World Health Organisation says:  Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind.

In the WHO’s own words, “The IA 2030 strategy—to extend the benefits of vaccines to everyone, everywhere—is underpinned by four core principles: it puts people in the center, is led by countries, implemented through broad partnerships, and driven by data.”

See if you can find the four core principles embedded in Jacinda’s pretty little speech.

Did you know the World Health Organisation even had a global immunisation agenda?  It works in with ID2020.  It kind of throws current events into perspective, doesn’t it?

My question is, what about all the people who won’t go along with this, the people who will refuse vaccines?  Mandated vaccinations is where I fear this is going.  Is that why Adern included “compliance officers” in the Covid-19 Health Response Bill for the plandemic pandemic, which sets up the legal framework for future alert levels?

“He waka eke noa,” she ends with, meaning “We’re all in this together.”  Waka is a canoe.  Is New Zealand up shit creek?

Shit creek

 


Notes

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Adern starts off with a Maori greeting and talks about a better future together …
“Together is an important word for us in NZ.  It says a shared vision.  It puts people at the heart of policy decisions.  It’s about building a happy, healthy, prosperous NZ, which everyone can benefit from.  Togetherness is the core of our strategy to deliver well-being and recognises that the spheres of our lives, our environment, our people, our economy interconnected and interdependent. 

These same principles lie at the heart of Sustainable Development Goals.  I’m proud to present NZ’s first voluntary national review on progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.  The report is a demonstration, I hope, of our strong commitment to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  

“We are innovative and resilient but we also have our share of challenges.  and one of these is to ensure that all NZ’ers achieve a decent standard of living and have a strong sense of well-being.  Leaving no one behind requires openness and honesty about the challenges we face and it is an approach we brought to our first review of the Sustainable Development Goals and to our domestic agenda. 

As we transition to a sustainable, productive and inclusive economy, we do require a deeper understanding of the groups who will be most affected so that we can ensure that the right strategies are in place to support them.  It does require us to do things differently.  It requires solid disaggregated data to base decisions on and we’ve developed a new suite of statistical indicators.  They’re called ‘indicators Aotearoa NZ.’  They go beyond economics to incorporate social, cultural and environmental measures. 

The indicators will provide a clearer picture of New Zealand’s overall well-being as well as a measure of our progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.  Alongside this, we have developed a new analytical framework that emphasises the diversity of outcomes meaningful for NZ’ers.  This Living Standards Framwework, as it’s called, will be part of our toolkit to analyse and assess policy options that enhance and support NZ’ers achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

NZ is strongly committed to being a leader and a constructive partner nationally and internationally, and the global effort to create a more sustainable and inclusive economy.  We recognise that all Sustainable Development Goals are connected and cannot be achieved by our governments alone.  This report, I hope, also highlights our government’s priorities including working towards eradicating poverty, improving mental health, addressing inequalities, thriving in a digital age and transitioning to a lower emission sustainable economy.  These initiatives are crucial to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.  We know the cumulative value of small incremental steps, the day to day decisions and actions that we make a difference and change people’s lives.”

“In the spirit of goal 17, we are committed to partnership.”

Note: Agenda 2030 Goal 17 is the “Global Partnership for the Sustainable Development Goals.”  It’s worldwide socialism – with wealth transfer and a global tax.  Part of their plans, officially dubbed “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals,” aims to reduce inequality worldwide by forcing individual governments and citizens alike to share their wealth under the guidance of a one world government.


Links

New Zealand MP Simon O’Connor expose the world coup and warns of absolute tyranny covid agenda

World Health Organisation: There are six WHO regions.

Here’s a presentation for the European Region: – Towards a roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the WHO European Region.

Health 2020, It goes into all the Agenda 2030 stuff, and when you get to slide 5 you’ll see that “Localization of the 2030 Agenda” takes place in the UN room where the UN, the World Health Organisation and the technocrats devised ID2020, a universal biometric ID for everyone.

UN Agenda 2030 Revealed: They Want A One World Government

Sustainable Development Goals. Click on each icon, then click on ‘Targets and Indicators.’  There are 169 of them.

That “well-being” Jacinda spoke of?  Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3 relates to ‘Good Health and Well-Being,’ hence the “Well-Being Budget.”

The Well-Being Budget, 2019: Jacinda Ardern’s ‘kooky’ plans to spend $26BILLION on a ‘wellbeing’ Budget will devastate New Zealand and force Kiwis to flee to Australia – and even the mum on the cover has crossed the ditch due to cost of living

Covid-19, the economic pain to come

As a small business we’re trying to navigate our way through the Covid-19 shut-down.  Being an essential service (Information Technology) we’re trading under extremely limited circumstances.  We may survive, but it’s impossible to do any forecasting right now and I have no confidence in the government.

Coronavirus edicartoon-3-3_2020-03-02

I’m questioning this so-called pandemic and the government’s actions, or inactions.

On the 25th March, NZ went to level 4 lock down.  We only had two days to prepare for it.

Was this whole thing necessary?  Does it fit the definition of a pandemic?  How is it different from a Sars outbreak?

“How bad is this?  How evil is this one?” asks Duncan Garner, TV news presenter for Newshub.

“It’s not the most evil that we’ve had. Sars and Mers coronaviruses were more severe. They killed, were set up to kill a lot more people …” replied Doctor Petousis-Harris.

Doctor Helen Petousis-Harris is the director of the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, as well as an Associate Professor at Auckland University.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_x8yDiifig

If Sars and Mers were worse, why was New Zealand shut down over this coronavirus, which most people recover from?

I don’t understand why our small South Pacific nation went to a level 4 lock-down when we’ve only had 19 deaths – all over 70 and all with pre-existing conditions.

Another thing I don’t understand – why did Jacinda give priority to the extreme abortion law in the midst of the so-called Coronavirus pandemic?  It doesn’t make sense.

Why wasn’t the government paying attention to the looming “medical crises” instead?  I have yet to hear the media ask this question.

It even turns out the Government was formally told by Dr Ashley Bloomfield, the Director General of Health, to completely close the borders in February.  When they finally closed the door, the virus had walked in and spread.

Business before the house, 17th March 2020

Why was he ignored?  Are there other nefarious and unreported agendas at work that we’re not aware of?

If this draconian level 4 lock down isn’t justified, then Adern is guilty of crashing the economy and she should be held accountable.

An article today said “Jacinda Ardern is sued over coronavirus lockdown and is accused of imposing strict measures in New Zealand ‘for her political gain.’

I don’t like their chances of successfully suing her.

Unfortunately the voting booth is the only choice we have and even then it’s a poor choice.  The contenders are globalists who either serve the UN or China.  We don’t have a true political choice or a voice in the media.  If Jacinda is voted out she’ll be off to a glittering career at the UN – just like socialist Helen Clark, her mentor and predecessor.

There’s an interesting article by Sir Bob Jones that is critical of Jacinda’s inept handling of this crisis.  Jones said, “Contrary to the Jacinda-obssessed non-critical media, New Zealand hasn’t done very well.  We’ve wrongly followed overseas practices to the letter.  We need not have gone that far and the economic cost will be enormous.”

Mike’s Minute: Have we overreacted to all of this?

HDPA: Australia’s figures suggest we’ve gone too hard with lockdown

NOTE, 10th May 2020

The government proactively dumped hundreds of documents late on Friday 8th May, and in an email obtained by RNZ, the prime minister’s office gagged her ministers by telling them not to do interviews.

In a 20 March document, top health officials recommended New Zealand move to alert level 2, and remain there for up to 30 days.  But just three days later, the government moved to level 3, and in another two days went to level 4.

Also, Adern wanted New Zealand to be on alert level 2-3 for two years!

Source: RNZ, Covid-19: Government need to explain response after documents released – National

I would like to know

  • why Jacinda Adern imposed a gag order after the document dump,
  • why she took New Zealand to lock down level 4 when she was told to go to level 2
  • why she ignored Dr Ashley Bloomfield, the Director General of Health, when he told her to completely close the borders in February
  • and why she wanted New Zealand to be on alert level 2-3 for two years!
Transparent-Govt-meme-1

meme of the day: thebfd.co.nz / The BFD Credit: Alex Davis

 


Links

The coming economic crisis and it’s political consequences.

Govt yet to figure out how to pay the COVID-19 bill

‘Saint Jacinda’ Ardern’s lockdown has not silenced her critics

We allowed the virus to be walked into the country

10th May 2020

Comment: The cynical and arrogant gagging order from PM’s office

Leak: PM Jacinda Ardern gags ministers speaking on COVID-19 8/5/2020 – Tova O’Brien speaking from parliament.

Was the NZ abortion law changed to meet a UN sustainable goal?

While the rest of the world’s governments are dealing with Covid-19, the NZ government pushed through the Abortion Amendment Act.  It’s an extreme abortion bill that there’s no public mandate for – you’ll see why in a minute.

It didn’t need to be changed – as the law stands, women can get abortions up to 20 weeks, and it’s easy to get in NZ – it’s pretty much ‘abortion on demand.’

The changes are horrific:

  • Abortion up to birth
  • No pain relief as the fetus is being dismembered
  • No life saving treatment for a baby born alive. Yes, infanticide is now legal.

Abortion NZ

I believe our abortion laws were liberalised in keeping with the demands of the UN.  It’s right here on their ‘Sustainable Developments Page,’ as part of Agenda 2030.  Population control is a UN development goal and Jacinda Adern wants to tick all the boxes she can while she’s in power.

access-to-legal-abortion-services-needed

Source: UN Sustainable Development Goals – Access to legal abortion services needed, to prevent 47,000 women dying each year – UN rights experts

In accordance with this, the NZ government stated they wanted to “remove abortion from the Crimes Act,” so I read the Act, and I found that abortion is only a crime when it’s procured illegally, as in a backstreet abortion.  (Section 183 – 187A of the Criminal Act for procurement.)

Currently, this law stands to protect NZ women from unregistered abortionists – but the government has now removed this protection, because the tightening of the definition of ‘health practitioner’ to doctor, midwife or obstetric nurse was defeated in the second reading of the bill.

So now, it’s legal to go to an unregistered abortionist.  Is this fulfilling the requirement?  Will Jacinda get a big fat tick on her sustainable development report card from the UN for this?  If the UN was involved, was this a suitable goal for New Zealand?

A sane society would offer a choice to women.  Women could be sheltered, paid to give birth, and have the child adopted out – but because there’s no statutory definition of fetuses or embryos as “unborn children” within New Zealand law, the evil people in power have mandated it’s okay to rip a live human fetus apart or leave a baby to die in a bucket.

I never thought I’d see the day when a NZ government would hold human life in such contempt.

Calves have more protection.  On 1st June 2015, a new law came into effect stopping farmers from inducing cows and killing the calf who wouldn’t survive being born too early.  This practice was considered “inhumane and cruel” by the MP’s promoting the change.  Unborn calves are now protected from this.

Green party logic

Also, the Whanganui River, the river that flows through my old home town, has been made “a legal person.”  That philosophy fits right in with ‘Gaia,’ but having children does not.

The contempt extends to the NZ public.

The public outcry has been ignored by the government and media.  The protest marches were ignored.

Media

Also ignored were submissions; 90.6% of the submissions were ignored by the parliamentary select committee.  Demonstrations which filled the streets were ignored and under-reported.  When the public clapped in the public gallery after MP Agnes Loheni opposed the bill,  the speaker of the house threatened to have them removed.

“National MP Agnes Loheni is staunchly against the bill and was quick to point out 91.6 percent of the submissions opposed the bill.  She said she was not scaremongering because there was plenty to be alarmed about, and diminishing the life of an unborn baby to the point they were no longer called babies meant humanity had been lost.

“Late-term surgical abortions are nothing short of barbaric,” she said.  “There is nothing kind in it – a truly progressive society protects the rights of all its members down to the smallest and most vulnerable, the unborn child.”

There was huge applause from the public gallery following her speech – prompting Speaker Trevor Mallard to threaten removal if it happened again.”

In desperation, another demonstration against the Abortion Legislation Bill was held at Parliament at the same time as the bill’s second reading, and this time it used graphic visual images.

“Out of respect for post-abortive woman, the pro-life movement has generally resisted using graphic visual photos of aborted babies in public places,” organiser Gina Sunderland said.

”But that’s all about to change.”

But Ardern, who supports the bill, said she was personally against the use of such images.

Instrgram 'welcome to our village wee one'

Jacinda and ger baby Neve. What would her baby’s name have been if she’d been terminated – “Never?”

“I just think that’s not a way to share the legitimate views that other people will have,” Ardern said.

Jacinda Ardern opposed to ‘graphic’ abortion law rally at Parliament

Leighton Baker of New Conservative stated that when Government ministers proclaim discomfort at being shown images of what they seek to legitimise, it proves that they are disconnected from reality and society.

There certainly is a disconnect.

Links

Here’s a handy summary of the amendments to the abortion bill that were all defeated on the second reading.  They show the real agenda of the pro-abortion lot.   Key amendments voted on were:
* requirement for abortion procedures post-20 week to ensure that fetus does not feel pain (as per the Animal Welfare Act which requires vets to ensure that animals don’t feel pain) – DEFEATED
* tightening of definition of ‘health practitioner’ to doctor, midwife or obstetric nurse (to avoid unsafe abortions) – DEFEATED
* abortions post-20 weeks only for extreme circumstances – DEFEATED
* keeping conscientious objection standards the same as they currently are (the bill currently weakens the protections) – DEFEATED
* restricting employment discrimination on grounds of conscience – DEFEATED
* cultural considerations to be considered consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi (woman’s wellbeing protected by recognising her whakapapa and the whanaungatanga responsibilities of her family, whanau, hapu, iwi, and family group) – DEFEATED
* annual reporting of abortion statistics (bill only requires reporting for 18 months after passing!) – DEFEATED

Also, 80 New Zealand MPs voted down the amendment of National MP Simon O’Connor which clarified that a qualified health practitioner who performed an abortion that results in the birth of a child after an attempted abortion has a duty to provide the child with appropriate medical care and treatment, no different than the duty owed to provide medical care and treatment to any other child born.  It was DEFEATED.
Source: Another atrocious day in Parliament, Family First


How’s this for gender-bending crap?  Other proposed amendments, in Green MP Jan Logie’s name, would scrap the 20-week legal test altogether or replace “woman” in the bill with “pregnant woman or other pregnant person.”  The 20 week limit was scrapped but they decided not to include a “pregnant man” in the definition.


Infanticide:  What Happens to a Child Born-alive? The Media Won’t Tell Us.


Opinion shaping: here’s an example of the poor quality of reporting on the issue in NZ – abortion was not a crime.  Abortion no longer a crime in New Zealand as law change passes final reading in Parliament.


NZ PM rushes world’s most extreme abortion legislation into law while country distracted with pandemic

Duckspeak and Agenda 2030

I will be blogging about the UN’s Agenda 2030, focusing mainly on it’s detrimental effects on New Zealand and Australia.  In case you don’t think it’s a thing, here’s Jacinda Adern speaking about fulfilling the goals of Agenda 2030.  Note, there is no mandate from the people of New Zealand for this.  When she says “we” or “New Zealand,” she’s speaking for herself.  

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

But this is a good example of “Duckspeak.”

“There is a word in Newspeak,’ said Syme, ‘I don’t know whether you know it: duckspeak, to quack like a duck.” – George Orwell, 1984

duck-quack

Adern’s minority government was elected to reduce immigration because of concern about New Zealand’s homeless problem.  We have the worst level of homelessness in the developed world.  Instead of doing anything about it – Adern increased the number of refugees and on Christmas 2019, our country was sneakily signed up to the UN’s Global Migration compact, without New Zealanders’ permission.

I am left asking why?

Adern broken promises

In case you think that “giving our country away” is a bit emotive, here’s the page showing the 1.1 million migrants for New Zealand.   Look and decide for yourself.  The source is the UN DESA (The UN ‘Department of Economic and Social Affairs.’)  Now we can see whose interests Jacinda is acting in – and it’s not New Zealand’s.


18 March 2020, further to this post: I’ve just read about a young gun owner in Waikanae who was harrassed by the police. He was asked questions about the New Conservative party: “Do you know what New Conservative’s immigration policy is?”
Do you know any representatives of the New Conservative party?”

Source: https://waikanaewatch.org/2020/03/16/police-continue-to-intimidate-licenced-firearms-owners/

Why was the NZ Police asking about this political party???

Here is New Conservative’s reply about their immigration policy:

New Conservative

 

 

Dear NZ Police Management,

New Zealand is a sovereign nation, and it’s also supposed to be a democratic one. So please find our immigration policy attached.

PS – You are supposed to enforce law, not a political agenda…

#LetsFixThis

Immigration policy

Immigration is central to many parts of New Zealand’s culture, economy, and future prospects. New Conservative believes that there is a balance to be struck between the important benefits that immigration brings and the wellbeing of those who already call New Zealand “home.”

We believe that those who choose to immigrate should embrace New Zealand’s culture and not try and change it.​

New Conservative will ensure there is no acceptance or allowance of Sharia Law, in any expression, as well as any non-constitutional jurisdictional authority, in New Zealand.

The key New Conservative immigration policy is “Net Zero Immigration”. This would be for a period determined by the time taken to ease housing demand, which could be as little as 12 months (student visas and returning New Zealanders excluded).

Long term immigration policy must be based on which occupations will be available/necessary in the future.​

Prioritising immigrants who can add to our economy and not depend on it.​

Working with NZ based non-governmental organisations operating in troubled zones to identify genuine refugees who are more closely aligned with our nation’s values, and fill our refugee quota with these people, rather than accepting the United Nations allotment.

NZ New Conservative

Downs – but not out

Right now, our government is amending our Abortion laws, I thought they were liberal enough but apparently not.

“I’m proposing it comes out of the Crimes Act,” Jacinda Adern explained to the disability community.

It sounds very high-minded and caring.  Actually Jacinda’s being disingenuous about abortion being in the Crimes act.   I’ll go even further and say dishonest.  The only thing mentioned in the Crimes Act about abortion is in terms of getting a backstreet abortion.  That’s the only part of it that’s a crime!  I’d really like her to explain that one to the NZ public.

Currently, there is a 20-week time limit for abortions in New Zealand law.

“We have time periods already set out in law, I’m not proposing changes to that,” Jacinda reassured the disability community.”

Jacinda aand abortion

Really?

She must have changed her mind and forgot to tell the community.  The proposed legislation will see this time limit removed and abortion will be available up until birth, with the approval of a single registered health practitioner.

“In the jurisdictions that have a similar clause, this has in practice allowed for abortion for disabilities including Down syndrome right up to birth.”

There are many New Zealanders who are pro-life going by the March for Life in 2019, they’ve filled the streets but they’re not being listened to.

I don’t want to sit as judge and jury on any parent who has conceived a disabled child.  It’s their choice, it’s already up to them what they want to do.  My beef is the prime minister changing the laws while lying to the NZ public and the disability community.

When we were setting up our business, I worked as a caregiver for intellectually disabled people on the weekends.  They were the nicest group of people I’ve ever worked with – kind, childlike, very positive people.  There wasn’t any gossip or nastiness.  It was nice, a complete contrast to some of the toxic work places I’ve endured.

It is an obstacle having a disability, but it doesn’t have to be the end of the world.  I’ve noticed that intellectually disabled people have a very high EQ – emotional intelligence. It’s as if nature wants to compensate.

It’s inspirational when the disabled and their family can succeed against all the odds.  Here’s some success stories:

father-down-syndrome-son-shares-life-story-sader-issa

Student From Syria Shares How He Was Raised By His Dad Who Has Down Syndrome

“A child you grows up in the lap of a person with Downs Syndrome will have all the love and tenderness that anyone can offer,” the son said.

Couple With Down Syndrome Married For 24 Years Celebrate Their Anniversary


Campaign to change “discriminatory” abortion law around Down’s syndrome.

“You need to see the person behind the extra chromosome, see their inner beauty.” 

This mother and daughter are campaigning to change the laws around abortions of pregnancies where the foetus has Down’s syndrome. At the moment women are allowed to terminate the pregnancy right up until the moment of birth, even though the standard abortion limit is at just 24 weeks. Heidi and Liz say this is “deeply offensive” and a form of discrimination towards those born with non-fatal disabilities.

Links

Mother of Kiwi man with Down syndrome calls for pre-natal testing to be banned

March For Life New Zealand 2019 – Highlights

Abortion law critics angered by handling of submissions

This is what can be aborted now – before NZ’s current 20 week limit:
Amazing Image of Unborn Baby at 18 Weeks is Called the Photograph of the Century
“The celebrated photograph was taken by Swedish photojournalist Lennart Nilsson and published in the April 1965 edition of Life under the title “Drama of Life Before Birth.” That issue became the “fastest-selling copy” of the magazine in the history of its publication, according to the report.

In full colour and crystal clear detail, the picture showed a foetus in its amniotic sac, with its umbilical cord winding off to the placenta. The unborn child, floating in a seemingly cosmic backdrop, appears vulnerable yet serene. Its eyes are closed and its tiny, perfectly formed fists are clutched to its chest,” the report described.”

Family First – the organisation in the next link, has been de-registered as a charity.

Radical Abortion Bill ignores Human Rights of Children

Submissions-90-meme