The Fine Art of Lethal Dosage Testing

Craig Paardekooper, a pharmaceutical sciences student at Kingston University, has tracked the patterns of deployment of toxic Covid 19 vaccine batches. He presents evidence of collusion between Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen.

Even though the subject matter is appalling, this is a very dry and detailed video. If you’re pushed for time I’ve made a transcript. This is worth listening to.

Craig Paardekooper has organised his presentation into four lessons. The first lesson explains about the toxic batches and he warns “don’t carry on rolling the dice.” The second lesson is a “who did it?” In the third lesson Paardekooper shows how each company appears to be working along with the others so that no one intrudes on the test slots. Lesson 4 is “The fine art of Lethal Dosage Testing, aka establishing the lethal limit without telling your experimental animals.”


In this video I’m going to be looking at the pattern of deployment of toxic batches.

The Covid vaccine was deployed in batches and each lot has a number. The batches are listed in the Vaers database in the order in which they were created, and the Vaers database also records the adverse reactions for each batch. Consequently, it was possible to make a graph plotting the adverse reactions along the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time or order along the X axis. In this way, I was able to see the patterns of deployment of toxic batches over time. I was also able to see which companies were responsible and where, and I was able to deduce the purpose of their activities. You’re going to be astonished at what you will read. It’s a revelation of sorts. You will see behind the curtain.

Here is a graph of all the reported batches in Vaers in their time sequence and with their associated adverse reactions over the 2021. So this is all the batches represented on a graph in 2021, in the order in which the batches were deployed, and on the vertical axis showing the number of adverse reactions for each batch. So each dot is a batch. Take a moment to look at what you can see. About 95% of the batches lie very close to the X axis in this thick line here. These patches are all relatively harmless, generating only a handful of adverse reactions per batch. In fact, 80% of all the batches generate only one or two adverse reaction reports and so are harmless. All these harmless batches are found close to the X axis. And now for the shock. All the clouds are dots and these spikes are dots.

All of these dots above the X axis. All of these clouds and spikes are toxic batches. Yes, all of them. Okay, you probably need a moment to let that sink in. Maybe take a breath or two. We’ll get more into what these spikes and clouds mean later. For now, I’ll just give you a statistical breakdown. 5% of all the batches belong to these clouds and spikes. The really toxic ones generate 1000 to 5000 adverse reaction reports and are found above this red line.

These batches have been found to consistently cause adverse reactions, disabilities, deaths and hospitalizations in every state right across the USA. Wherever they are deployed, wherever they are dispensed, they cause harm. So these are the really toxic batches here. Luckily, these batches above the red line only comprise about zero point 65% of all the batches. So there’s only a one in 200 chance that your vaccine shot will come from one of these. A lesson learned. If you have been lucky so far, then don’t carry on rolling the dice.

So the total number of batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in verse is 28,330. As mentioned above, 80% of the batches are harmless, generating only one or two adverse reaction reports per batch, and they all lie inside this thick line along the X axis. However, one in 200 batches are very toxic, generating 1000 to 5000 adverse reaction reports. And these are all of these dots here above the red line.

So that’s the end of lesson one.

And now go to lesson two. Who did it? The name of this lesson is “who did it.” In this lesson, what we’re going to find out is which companies did which bits of the deployment of the toxic batches. Once again, it will be a bit of a surprise, a bit of a shock knowing who did what is actually a lot simpler than Cludo. Because there are only three companies involved in the deployment of vaccines in the USA. Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen. These are the only three that show up in the various reports. In order to see the contribution that each had on the deployment of toxic batches, I simply filtered the manufacturer column and selected each company in turn. No big deal. Of course you’ll need to do this in Excel.

After downloading the database, you can’t do it using the more public control panel. You have to download the data into Excel. Anyway, here are the results for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen.

And firstly, we’re going to look at the full picture again. So here’s the full picture. Now, here are the results just for Moderna. And you’ll notice how Moderna accounts for every single vaccine batch in the first half of chart one. This is the total picture. And you’ll notice that the Moderna accounts for every single vaccine in the first half of this chart, except for two mysterious spikes before and after the Moderna batches. This spike and this spike, which it turns out were produced by Janssen and Janssen. And here are the results of the Pfizer batches. Notice that this is just Pfizer alone plotted from Vaers, and it exactly matches the latter half of the first chart.

It’s very remarkable that the size of that distribution is identical to the latter half. It appears as if the Pfizer completely took over supply of every single batch of vaccine in the USA. I’ll give the reason later for that.

And it’s also interesting how each company appears to be working along with the others so that no one intrudes on the other slot. Notice how Janssen abruptly stops and then Moderna starts, then Moderna stops all toxic batches, and then Janssen starts, and then Pfizer starts. And at this point, Moderna completely leaves the picture and does absolutely no more batches. And so Pfizer begins here and you have the results. Quite unexpected because I would have rather expected that the deployments from each company would be intermingled and spread out. Instead, what we have is carefully compartmentalized deployments from each company. So these are carefully compartmentalized deployments.

As I said, it looks like they’re all being organized from above so that no one intrudes on the others operations or time slots. That’s the end of that lesson.

Now we’re going to look at what the patterns mean. Okay, initially there was a preliminary test by Janssen. Prior to this test, there were harmless batches were deployed. And then suddenly and rather abruptly, Janssen deploys about 18 highly toxic batches, all very closely, very close in time, in close temporal succession, and with a toxicity up to 2000 times the toxicity of the previous harmless batches.

The introduction of the toxic batches begins very abruptly and then it ends and they resume harmless batches again. Then Moderna steps in and starts distributing harmless batches, but intermingling them with all of these toxic patches. They start deploying toxic batches almost immediately and they’re interspersive harmless patches. The toxic batches are mostly in the same range as the Janssen spike.

Above this range, they fade out and become much less frequent. So it looks as if the Janssen may have done a preliminary test run which was then taken up by Moderna, who produced all of their toxic vaccines, mainly within that range of nought to 2000, with some fading out above towards the end of Moderna’s time slot. It looks like Moderna had quite a bit of vaccine. It wanted to deploy quite a lot of toxic vaccine.

And that’s why there’s much greater concentration of toxic batches just here towards the end of their time slot. And then straight after Moderna resumes harmless batches all the way to here. So these are all harmless again. It’s just completely stopped distributing toxic batches. However, Janssen does a second test. This time it goes up to the same maximum of 2000, but it’s in a narrower range of 1000 to 2000.

So it looks as if Janssen has by this time learned how to focus the toxicity into a specific target range, 1000 to 2000 times the base toxicity. They’re achieving a narrower spread, avoiding the less potent and therefore more wasteful lower range north to 1000. So Janssen is becoming more precise. Then there’s a long period here of only harmless batches distributed by Moderna.

During this time, it looks as if the companies were creating a clear baseline before the subsequent testing, which I’ll go into a bit later. Moderna exited the picture completely at this point and Pfizer steps in. Pfizer being the German company, it looks as if Pfizer carries out a series of linear dosage tests. So what’s really extraordinary is how these three companies were acting in relay with each other. It really is odd. It’s as if all careful monitored dosage testing was allocated to the Germans while Moderna was given the initial job of randomly dispersing toxic batches.

Why was the Pfizer brought in? As you will see in the following, Pfizer was brought in to carry out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording and monitoring the effects. In order to do this effectively, they had to be the only company administering batches of vaccine. There could be no interference from other companies like Moderna, which would only mix and cloud the results. So Pfizer took over complete control of the Vaccination program in the USA.

It’s as if all carefully monitored dosage testing was allocated to the Germans. The delegation of dosage testing to Pfizer was most likely because Moderna was uncomfortable about testing on their own people, and it would be safer to involve an outside party for this nasty work. Moderna employees might waver in the face of applying toxins to their own friends and neighbours, and it only takes one leak. The purpose of Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches Moderna randomly distributed its toxic batches. In contrast, it looks as if the Pfizer deployed its batches with far more controlled under strict testing conditions, as will be described in the next lesson.

The purpose of the Moderna, therefore, was not to monitor or measure, since the deployment looks random and uncontrolled. Rather, it seems the deployment of toxic batches was simply to harm, possibly for the purpose of inducing fear of a pandemic and justifying stronger policies. The initial spike by Jansson that preceded the Moderna deployment looks like a test of the 2000 times dosage before Moderna released it upon the public. Here ends lesson three.

Lesson four. The fine art of Lethal Dosage Testing, aka establishing the lethal limit without telling your experimental animals. Here’s a close up of the deployment of all the batches by Pfizer in the USA, which followed the Moderna deployment. Now, Pfizer deployed about 9500 batches of Covid 19 vaccine in the USA. And curiously, the toxic batches that they deployed do not appear randomly arranged in time.

Rather, they cluster together in time, forming discrete periods of application clusters. So we have the cluster here, another cluster there, another cluster there another cluster here, another cluster here, and another cluster here. And we could say there’s a cluster here, but this one is less precise, but certainly all the others are highly clustered together in time, so they don’t appear random at all.

These clusters in between are punctuated by equally wide periods of total calm, or rather the total absence of toxic batches. In other words, only harmless batches are being deployed in between the clusters. Which is odd again, because if this was random, you’d expect kind of lots of intermediate, randomly dispersed, randomly scattered batches. But no, it goes highly toxic, zero toxic, highly toxic, zero toxic, highly toxic, zero toxic, highly toxic. And it’s like a non random distribution.

Okay. And the transition between cluster and calm, and the transition between the cluster of toxic batches and the periods of harmless batches is always abrupt. Also, the toxic batches don’t appear to be randomly arranged in terms of their toxicity. Just as the batches cluster in time, they also cluster in toxicity falling into discrete ranges.

For example, here’s a range, then here’s a range, then here’s a range, then here’s a range. In fact, all the ranges are about the same distance between the minimum and maximum. So here we have, the range is in 2000 to 3000 times. Then this range here is in about 1500 to 2500 and this one here is in the range 1000 kwh. And this one here is in the range well it’s possibly north to 1500. That could be 500 to 1,500. Either way, it’s a very nice linear decline that we can see in the dosages that they were administering.

So the toxic batches do not appear to be randomly arranged in terms of their toxicity. That is that clustering time also clustering toxicity falling into discrete ranges. Ranges that are distinct from the other clusters. So that’s another odd thing why the range here should be discrete and distinct from the range here.

If this was random and the range here is different from that one and the range here is different from that one. Furthermore, the toxicity ranges of sequential clusters decrease in a stepwise manner rather than as a continuous slope and these steps follow a linear decline. Okay, yes. So if the toxicity was random we would expect it to not necessarily go down in steps, but rather just a continuous slope. Perhaps. But these are in steps. It’s steps of 500.

All these characteristics can be observed in the chart below and they suggest that Pfizer is involved in deploying highly toxic batches of vaccine to every state of the USA for the purpose of identifying effective doses effective that is for their purposes. Thousands of citizens will have been hospitalized, injured, disabled and killed by these toxic batches. This was a medical experimentation upon the people of America young and older, like many of whom are still suffering in tremendous pain to this very day.

So I’ve gone over the periods of the chart. So just to sum up the medical experiment by the Pfizer, many characteristics of this deployment suggest that they were carrying out discrete dosage testing. One highly toxic batches clustered together in close temporal proximity. They appear in clusters close to each other.

In time, these sequential clusters are abruptly separated by clear periods during which only harmless batches are deployed. The toxicity of these toxic batches is not random, but rather is clustered into narrow ranges of toxicity. The clusters of batches occupy ranges of toxicity that are distinct from one another and follow a stepwise linear decline, each step being equal in size and punctuated by a clear period of harmless batches. The batch steps were in sequential order 3000 times, 2500 times, 2000 times, and 1500 times here.

That’s the end of my presentation and what you’ve seen is not just that the demonstration that batches are not all of equal toxicity, but I’ve also shown throughout the presentation that the deployment of these toxic patches often is not random. They appear abruptly. They appear in a systematic way time slotted for each company and also ceased just as abruptly. Just like Janssen ceased suddenly and resumed harmless batches just as Moderna ceased all of its toxic batches and resumed a long period of harness batches and then the Pfizer launches in with dosage testing at a very high toxic level and then decreases it systematically in steps of 500 in a linear step wise fashion.

So it’s not just that batches vary in toxicity, vary very widely 80% are relatively harmless only producing one or two at first reaction reports. The remainder can be have toxicity up to 5000 times the majority of the batches and these toxic batches seem to have been deployed systematically and deliberately upon the American people. It’s ironic that America, the erstwhile victors of the Second World War, should finally fall victim to medical experimentation carried out by the Germans.

What’s being discovered on the road to Human 2.0

Do you know what’s being injected into us in the name of keeping us safe from Covid? I’ve got two videos for you to watch, for which I’ve done transcripts. This is mind boggling. I know you will probably have cognitive dissonance about this, but I urge you to watch the videos.

The first video is by Dr Matt Shelton, a NZ doctor who is trying to understand the inexplicable and raise awareness of nanotech in the vaccines. He spoke on parliament grounds on the 18th February 2022 regarding undeclared nanotech components found in COVID-19 Vaccines.

The second video is a talk by Dr. Andreas Noack, an Austrian chemist who was one of the foremost experts on graphene in the world. He explained what graphene does to the body. He died just after releasing the information.

Here’s the transcript of Dr Matt Shelton, which starts at 01:24.

… And doing their own testing to a high scientific level. Now, in some areas of science, this is ordinary technology. Now, I have seen it with my own eyes down a microscope, but as have others better qualified to me to understand what they’re looking at over the last several weeks. And that’s why I am here today. To tell the truth.

These images are available online at our site and plenty of others. And I want to particularly recommend a site called and, where a team of scientists who have been working here, not us, have uploaded all their work.

We’ve tried to alert Medsafe, government, even MPs directly five times in the last month to get them to pause and investigate. Silence … except a muted “we’ll get back to you” from their lawyers. A few paid government shills have said, “oh, it’s just dirt or dust,” or we’re easily scared because we don’t know what we’re looking at! Damn right we’re scared! Of what this technology is for and what might happen next. I’m not ready to be Human 2.0 and no one asked our permission!

And we’re scared of a government that’s lost the plot. We wrote on the 27 September last year (2021) to Medsafe and ministers to alert them as emerging findings from overseas of nanotechnology gadgets, largely made of graphene, a known poison for humans and in all the major brands tested. That word from Spain has now been confirmed elsewhere, including Germany, Austria, Argentina. And just last week, in a high level science report from the UK also with legally valid chain of custody proof. And you guys know what that means, that no fraud has occurred and the results are real.

We believe the government contract won’t allow it to do its own testing, nor to know exactly what’s in the shots, which is why this is now in the hands of New Zealand police, who have the evidence that we urged them to investigate, despite the massive cognitive dissonance that they must feel. Yes, we get it. We have had two years to try to understand the inexplicable and slowly come to terms with the scale of what it seems we are up against. The problem for all of us, if this is true, and especially for our friends in the police, is that this must be the biggest crime in history, surely? How to proceed?

Well, it would be a brave policeman or policeman who took the risk of dismissing this evidence as just too preposterous, with over two and a half billion people who’ve been vaccinated watching them and waiting for answers. But it would be an even braver one that says, yes, me and my staff believed what we were told and we did the right thing.

But now we see there may be a risk for public health. You see, protecting the public good is the most basic role of the police. It’s why many went into the police, to protect and serve. It is surely a very low bar to achieve. But if they do not meet that standard and investigate, what good are they doing? Why should we even bother with them? We would be on our own and need to start again from the ground up, but we know they are better than that. They are us.

I’m sorry to turn my back on an audience but actually we’ve all been turning our back on the most important audience so I’m going to turn around and address my audience. You must ask your senior Sergeant and your commander what investigations are happening and why the true threat to the public hasn’t been neutralized. We’ve been hearing all week here from injured people and from health workers saying they know what is really going on in the system and we’ve been hearing this elsewhere for months and months. So we will keep fighting for everyone here today, but especially for the jabbed, many of whom are still absolutely fine, of course, but many are absolutely not fine. And hundreds, including some children are no more.

Wake up! There are things to be scared of, just not what they have been telling us. So they need to get their arses down here, talk to us and we can all sort this out. Thank you.

Video, 8 minutes: Dr. Matt Shelton: Undeclared Nanotech Components Found in COVID-19 Vaccines, 18.02.22

Here’s the transcript of German chemist Dr Andreas Noack, posted by him November 23, 2021. He died four days after publishing his talk.

“You can make braking pads out of this. It is not biologically decomposable. These nanoscale structures can best be described as razor blades. These razor blades are injected into the body. Nano-scale, tiny razor blades only one atom layer thick.

It is basically an acid. It suspends well in water because of the negative charge. So these razor blades spread homogeneously in the liquid. This is basically russian roulette. It cuts the blood vessels. The blood vessels have epithel cells as their inner lining. The epithel is extremely smooth, like a mirror. And it is cut up by these razor blades. That is what’s so dangerous.

If you inject the vaccine into a vein, the razors will circulate in the blood and cut up the epithel.

The mean thing is the toxicological tests are done in petri dishes and there you will not find anything.

These are the sharpest imaginable structures because they are only one atom layer thick. This is a huge molecule which is extremely sharp.

I am a specialist in activated carbon. In my doctoral thesis, I have converted graphene oxide to graphene hydroxide. I joined the world leading carbon manufacturer. After a year I was in charge of new activated carbon products. We bought a small company new Newcastle, England. I was in charge of new carbon products Europe-wide. I was in application scouting.

If you perform an autopsy on the victims, you will not find anything. Toxicologists do their tests in petri dishes. They can’t image there are structures that can cut up blood vessels. There are pictures of coagulated blood coming out of the nose. People bleed to death on the inside. Especially the top atheletes who are dropping dead have fast flowing blood. The faster the blood flows, the more damage the razors will do.

As a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer. It’s a new material, toxicologists are not aware of it yet. Suddenly it makes sense that the victim looks like this.

You see people collapse immediatley after vaccination and have a seizure. These people had bad luck in russian roulette. Very likely, a vein was hit by a syringe.

The question you have to ask politicians and doctors, the question doctors should ask Phizer is: why are these razor blades in the vaccine? Now they want to force vaccinate children from the age of five.

The basis of medicine or pharmaceutics is chemistry. This doctor (Dr Szekeres, president of the Austrian medical board) has no idea about chemistry. Completely new structures unknown to nature are brought in (with the vaccines.)

Everyone is talking about the messenger RNA which has complex effects. The theory of mRNA is complex. But every chemist understands what this (graphene oxide) does. You see the mRNA story is possibly a diversion. I cannot imagine anyone will give me as a carbon specialist a proper explanation why these carbon razor blades are in the vaccine. This is war. They distract us with the messenger RNA. But people cannot collapse that quickly from that right after the injection. Something else is going on. And this effect should be studied.

He claims to be a specialist. Apparently the Austrian doctors don’t have a smarter guy than this one. He is a doctor who doesn’t understand chemistry, or he is a criminal, or he is a mass-murderer.

After the Spanish doctor’s study it is official that nanoscale graphene oxide is in the vaccine. So it is clear that razor blades are injected. So he is probably incompetent. If you want to inject a whole population by force, you have to do your homework extremely carefully. Because if there is something wrong with the injection, you will kill the whole population of a country.

Any doctor in Austria, after this information is now public, continues to inject this, is a murderer.

I am not some guy in the carbon field. I doctored in this area. I have a good idea of what the graphene oxide does. It is Russian roulette. Do you hit the vein or not? Does it stay in the muscle? Then it is less toxic. But if you hit a vein, and the batches contain different amounts of GHO, then you have to know you are cutting people up from the inside.

And it is a highly intelligent poison. Because a normal toxicologist who works with petri dishes, cannot find it because it doesn’t move. Toxicologists just don’t expect an nanoscale razors. As a chemist, I vouch for the fact that these are nanoscale razor blades. It stays in the body forever.

Even if people don’t drop dead immediately, it cuts up the blood vessels little by little. It destroys the heart. All the heart attacks. All the strokes. As a doctor, you have to ask, where is this coming from? If you understand that razors are being injected, it is clear why all the cardiovascular diseases appear. The heart is cut up. The brain is cut up. Blood vessels are cut up.

The epithel cells are extremely smooth for a good reason, but become rough when cut up like this and things stick to it. By now every idiot can inject this. And when they hit a vein …

This material is declared “an experimental vaccine” for a reason. They don’t know what will happen. Every vaccinated subject has to sign they will take full responsibility. It will take 50 years before the contracts with Pfizer will be published. What is in these contracts? Why 50 years?

In Germany or Austria, there is no-one with my expertise. I wrote my thesis in this field. I know what I am talking about.

Sir Karl Popper explained the fundamentals of science. Hypothesis – refutation. Popper said it it better to kill theories than humans. The whole population is supposed to be injected. Exactly like Karl Popper said, if you continue to ride this murderous theory, you have to be extremely careful. They are the first to impose a vaccine mandate. They are killing the whole Austrian nation.

We had an Austrian once who brought death and suffering over Europe. I am appealing to you to share this video on all channels. I notice how little doctors know about chemistry. But they are doing chemistry in the body. In small children. In pregnant women. If you continue, I promise you, no court in the world will save you. You are ready to force-vaccinate the whole Austrian people with razor blades that are not biologically degradable.”

Translated Nov 25th 2021.


Nanotech found in Pfizer jab by New Zealand lab : Sue Grey and Dr Matt Shelton report findings to Parliament’s Health Select Committee. Recorded on 28th Jan 2022.

German whistleblower, Dr. Andreas Noack was MURDERED

Dr. Andreas Noack is one of the foremost experts on graphene in the world. He has studied data from Professor Pablo Campra from the University of Almeira. Dr. Campra used micro-raman spectroscopy to analyze the contents of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Dr. Noack reviewed Dr. Campra’s findings and found that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene hydroxide.

Dr. Noack explains that the nanoparticles of graphene hydroxide act as kind-of razor blades slicing and dicing as they move through the body. Graphene hydroxide is not biodegradable. It remains circulating in the blood indefinitely. Dr. Noack explains that the heart and brain are organs that are particularly susceptible to damage from graphene hydroxide.

Dr. Noack opines that is why there has been a rash of young athletes dropping dead from heart attacks. The blood of the young athletes is efficiently coursing throughout the body causing unseen damage until they unexpectedly drop dead. Dr. Noack explains that doctors performing autopsies on victims of the vaccine are not going to find the graphene hydroxide because they are looking for something biological as the cause of death. Graphene hydroxide is not biological so it will not be visible in their tests.

Expert Reportedly Killed After He Publicly Revealed that Graphene Hydroxide is in COVID-19 Vaccines and Warned of Its Dangers.

Expert Reportedly Killed After He Publicly Revealed that Graphene Hydroxide is in COVID-19 Vaccines and Warned of Its Dangers

Life of the Blood, Nanotech in the shots

Human 2.0 Is Coming Faster Than You Think. Will You Evolve With The Times?


How nanotechnology helps mRNA Covid-19 vaccines work

COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients

National Laboratory of medicine: Nano dimensions/adjuvants in COVID-19 vaccines

MIT Technology Review: Writing Circuits on Graphene – this was from 2010

CoVid vaccines based on graphene, nanonetwork and Internet of Nanothings (IoNT) – Kira Smith

How to break the mandates

I was talking to a man last night who is doing his best to warn his children about the mandates, but they’re not listening, despite all his Facebook posts.

What to do? I read a great article by Julius Ruechel, The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell.

It’s a long article, here’s what I’ve gleaned;

We have to plant a seed of doubt. Data is not going to speak to a frightened mind, people will only look for that after they start questioning the government’s narrative.

Doubt leads the mind to seek out data, not the other way around. The regime is doing everything it can to prevent the fearful from thinking. This is a psychological war.

To plant a seed of doubt, to help people take that first step, it is not what we say that matters so much as being seen to say it, out loud, in public, in a way that allows you to be identified and counted, and being willing to face the music when the world can see what you really think. And saying it over and over again, relentlessly, until enough voices join in, until the counter chorus can no longer be dismissed as fringe. Doubt is created by breaking the illusion of consensus.

The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell

The NZ Government creates the illusion of consensus by referring to us as the “team of 5 million.” In New Zealand the convoy and the presence of the North Island protesters at parliament and South Island protesters at Picton is breaking that illusion.

Remember Hans Christian Andersen’s folk tale? It was a child speaking up about the emperor having no clothes that broke the spell. “All it took was a pointed finger, a well-timed laugh, and the courage to speak out.”

Doubt can also be created when someone’s personal experience doesn’t match the propaganda that they’ve been fed.

Many only started to ask questions after being required to get their booster shots.

As they begin to feel safe, they regain their ability to think, which gives rise to questions and doubts. The regime does not want people to regain their ability to see clearly and think independently. They’re trying to stoke hysteria about the unvaccinated and keep the vaccinated in fear with never ending variants in order to keep control.

We have to understand the long game that is being played. Our freedom is being removed incrementally, one piece at a time. Our disapproval is irrelevant unless we say it out loud and take a stand. Visibility. Letters, petitions, Facebook posts and press releases, these avenues are all in the same realm as the data. They will be dismissed until after the spell begins to break.

Break the illusion of consensus

Currently the regime is manufacturing an illusion of consensus to use herd instinct as a means of control. Breaking the illusion of consensus is what will give us the power to force the herd to think for itself. That is why it is so important that the silent good people speak out.

Change always starts from the fringes; change begins with a committed minority that refuses to be cowed.

Once an idea is adopted by 10% of the population, research shows that this is the psychological tipping point when ideas, opinions, or beliefs will be rapidly adopted by the rest of the population.  A noisy 10% is all it takes. Our freedom is not as far out of reach as you may think.

But it has a best-before date if the silent good people wait too long before speaking out.

It is the absence of noise, not the clash of swords, that marks the sound of liberty slipping away. 

Recognizing that the emperor has no clothes is not enough. People also have to be willing to say it out loud. That second point is currently our weakest link in this psychological war. 

Push the regime

When an authoritarian regime seeks to consolidate its power, there is a point of no return when no amount of dissent can stand up to the entrenched might of the juggernaut. The race is on between the regime’s ability to consolidate its power and those on our side to build up the courage to publicly express dissent.

The real heroes in this battle are the millions of citizens who come out from behind a veil of anonymity, at home, at work, with friends, with family and neighbors to add their voices to the counter chorus. Their words are not important. A joke, a meme, or the courage to whisper “bullshit” is all that it takes. Saying it publicly is all that matters. 

We need to push the regime to move further and faster as it feels its hold over the crowd begin to slip. We need to goad it into eroding its support base by overplaying its hand.

The regime can only push people into a corner for so long. It can only cry “variant” for so long before the effect wears out. We are neither a tame nor a broken people, yet. All we need to do is refuse to shut up (which breaks no laws) in order to force the regime into taking self-defeating measures. Its grip is slipping, and the crowd’s patience is wearing thin.

When the mood of the crowd turns, it will be sudden. We can win this game, easily, but only if the silent good people already on our side step out of the shadows to join our counter-chorus. Once the crowd is ours, the rest will happen all on its own.

By refusing to submit, by fighting them at any cost, on principle, it raises the cost for any tyrant who preys on the freedoms of others.

Force their hand

The official narrative is rapidly dissolving, rendering the fascism of the New Normal visible. This is happening now because those of us who have seen it from the beginning — and have been resisting it all along — have held out long enough to run out the clock. GloboCap can’t keep the narrative going, so all they have left is brute fascist force.

We need to make GloboCap deploy that force, and to shine a big, bright spotlight on it, as the truckers and protesters in Ottawa have just done. In case anyone is confused about the tactic, it’s called classic non-violent civil disobedience. I described it in a recent column:

“In other words, we need to make GloboCap (and its minions) go openly totalitarian … because it can’t. If it could, it would have done so already. Global capitalism cannot function that way. Going openly totalitarian will cause it to implode … no, not global capitalism itself, but this totalitarian version of it. In fact, this is starting to happen already. It needs the simulation of ‘reality,’ and ‘democracy,’ and ‘normality,’ to keep the masses docile. So we need to attack that simulation. We need to hammer on it until it cracks, and the monster hiding within in appears. That is the weakness of the system … New Normal totalitarianism will not work if the masses perceive it as totalitarianism, as a political/ideological program, rather than as a response to a deadly pandemic.”

The Naked Face Of New Normal Fascism
by Tyler Durden


Principles are a philosophical safety mechanism that protects society by raising the price for tyrants who would otherwise steal our freedoms through a thousand tiny slices. 

The fact that our freedoms are currently under attack is an indication that the tyrants believe there are not enough principled men and women left who are willing to push back, on principle. So far, they are right. It’s time to prove them wrong and raise the price of their tyranny. It’s time for the silent good people to break their silence, at any cost, on principle.

This lovely man is 80 years old and he saluted for the full half hour length of the convoy, apparently, as it passed through Wanganui.
Photo – Donna Henton

All governments rule through the consent of the crowd, including tyrannies. You don’t have to like what they do. You just have to comply. Saying nothing legitimizes each baby step towards full blown tyranny.

Freedom is not granted by governments. Freedom is earned by crowds willing to defend it for themselves, for their neighbors, for their peers, and for their children. On principle.

To sum up, I believe it’s not too late, we can win. To fight back, we need to

  • plant a seed of doubt, break the illusion of consensus
  • speak out publicly, protest, poke fun at the regime. Use jokes, memes, call it for what it is, “bullshit.”
  • push the regime, force their hand
  • act on our principles, do not comply.


The Emperor Has No Clothes: Finding the Courage to Break the Spell

Should Christians submit to the authorities?

“Test, mask, vaccinate” has been the message blared at us for nearly two years now. Should we be obeying that diktat? This is a post I made on my other blog but I’d like to hear what people outside the churches think about compliance. Some Christians are going along with the mandates while others are actively resisting. It’s a deeply troubling and divisive issue.

Some influential Christian leaders encourage their congregations to go along with the vaccine mandates, citing Romans 13, a passage from the Bible that tells us to obey the governing authorities.

The thing is, the original Greek word has a slightly different meaning. The Greek word hupotasso, which has been translated as “submit” or “be subject,” literally means to arrange stuff respectfully in an “orderly manner underneath,” like in the military.

It’s a bit different from conforming, following commands, or to kowtowing to an authority as a subordinate.

I’ve covered the topic here:

Sumbission, have we got it right?

Is it time for us to stop obeying?


Kiwi church leaders defy Ardern’s threats to vaccinate or face a $15k fine

Vaccines rolled out to NZ children when Medsafe’s data shows the safety and efficacy of the Covid Vaccine in children has not yet been established

What would happen if the NZ media stopped breathlessly regaling us with the daily case numbers for Covid, Delta and Omicron, did their job and actually reported on the daily harm and deaths from the Pfizer injection?

Here NZ media, I’ll do it for you. I’m doing what you should because NZ children are now being put in harms way. My facts are from the single source of truth.

“The year 2021 closed with the latest report on Adverse events following immunisation. As at the 31st December 2021, 314 serious side effects and 133 deaths were reported to CARM after the administration of the Comirnaty vaccine.”

Of the 133 deaths, seven were aged under 29 and 28 were aged under 59. The others were over 60.

The deaths were expected as Medsafe state that “all medicines can cause side effects.”

Medsafe obtained the expected numbers of deaths after the first dose from the University of Auckland.

The reports of serious side effects were filed by the patients, vaccinators, nurses, GP’s and pharmacists.

The next safety report (#40) will be published on 16 February 2022, for the period ending 31 January 2021. Meanwhile, the vaccination program for children aged 5 to 11 commenced on the 17th January despite Medsafe’s documentation stating the safety and efficacy of COMIRNATY in children aged less than 12 years of age has not yet been established.

End of report.

Jo Blogs standing in for absent NZ Media

In accordance with the government’s insistence on being “the single point of truth,” the numbers of dead and inured people come straight from the Medsafe website : Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines: Safety Report #39 – 31 December 2021

Here are the questions I would want asked of the NZ prime minister and health officials, if we had a working media;

  • Citing the NZ Government’s own figures, the 133 deaths from vaccine injury are now more than double the 52 deaths for Covid. How can this vaccination program and traffic light system be justified?
  • How can we trust the total number of 52 deaths from Covid when a man shot dead by the police in Auckland on November 5th 2021 was counted as a “Covid death?”
  • Why is the vaccine described to the NZ Public as “safe and effective” when, from the NZ government’s own documents, Medsafe expected fatalities from the vaccine?
  • Why is the Pfizer vaccine being rolled out to 5 to 11 year olds when, from the NZ government’s documents, the *Comirnarty Data Sheet linked to the Medsafe report clearly states the safety and efficacy of COMIRNATY (the Covid vaccine) in children aged less than 12 years of age have not yet been established?

*See page 4 of the Cominarty Data Sheet.


Total NZ deaths from Covid, according to Worldometer:

Daily New Deaths in New Zealand

Since March 2020 there have been 52 deaths from Covid. As at 31 December 2021 where there have now been 133 deaths from Adverse Effects Following Immunisation.

Why the NZ man shot by police was counted as a Covid death:

“The clinical criteria will continue to be guided by [World Health Organization] definition, which is basically to report any death where the person had an acute COVID-19 infection regardless of what the cause of death might be,” Bloomfield said about death reports in general.”

New Zealand man who died of gunshot wound to be recorded as COVID-19 death: Report

The TV One news reporter commenting on that death can be seen on this link. I’m surprised he kept a straight face.

The Safety report from the Medsafe website to 31 December 2021 : Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines: Safety Report #39 – 31 December 2021

The expected deaths from the Pfizer vaccine: The expected death rates following dose 1 were 25.81 young people for the under 30’s and 205.61 adults under 60. Data for expected death rates was obtained from the Adverse events of special interest (AESI) background rate (SAFE) study provided by the University of Auckland. 

Cited from the latest Medsafe Safety report for 31 December 2021 : “The national roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines commenced on 20 February 2021. The vaccine currently available in New Zealand is Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty). All medicines can cause side effects, the known side effects for Comirnaty are listed in the data sheet and consumer medicine information.”

Comirnarty Data Sheet: The version of the Comirnarty Data Sheet (Version: pfdcovii11121) appears to be dated the November 21st and supercedes a version (supersedes: pfdcovii10921) that appears to be dated 21st September 2021.

See page 4 of page 22, Paediatric use
The safety and efficacy of COMIRNATY in children aged less than 12 years of age have not
yet been established.


Babies: Medsafe’s report states, “the total of Adverse Effects Following Immunisation is different from the cumulative total above because it excludes 17 AEFI reports received for infants who did not receive the vaccine.”

Those 17 babies would have had injury reports filed after receiving the vaccine in their mothers milk.

Note: The Australian report on the COMIRNATY vaccine test results 25th Jan 2021, page 35 stated that there was no longer term safety data on use in pregnancy and while breast feeding.

Report: Australian Government Dept of Health and Aging
Therapeutic Goods Administration

Is Medsafe going to accept responsibility for the harm done to these babies?

News from the 17th January, 2021 that 1News did not investigate or report

The vaccinations for children aged 5 to 11 commenced on the 17th January. On that day, five children at the North Shore Events Centre are alleged to have collapsed following immunisation.

“Former TVNZ presenter Liz Gunn confronted a 1News reporter and her film crew outside a North Shore vaccination clinic today.

Gunn asked the reporter if she had heard that five children had collapsed earlier in the day and if she was going to report it. ‘How are you going to report that on 1News? Do you think that is part of what you’re supposed to do?’

‘I just can’t believe you guys are not reporting the full story. Why would you not be reporting five kids collapsing?’”



Liz Gunn outside the North Shore Events Centre:

Liz Gunn, news reporter interview

Are we going to tolerate this?


I’ve just finished an eBook called “Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy” by Iain Davis. I recommend it.

The book is available for free on this website.

The author states that the pseudopandemic was a psychological operation used to control billions through fear. A powerful group capitalised upon a respiratory disease, with a relatively low mortality rate, to create the illusion of a dangerous global pathogen.

He presents his evidence so we can identify those who had the means, motive and opportunity to commit the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on humanity. The author wants us to consider the evidence and make up our own minds.

Meticulously researched, evidence is cited throughout the book. The author stated it was necessary to provide links to archived citations because many of the scientific articles and papers, news reports and qualified opinion pieces have already been censored.

This global pseudopandemic is no ordinary fraud. The scale is immense and the complicit number in millions. However, the vast majority involved in perpetuating the scam were innocent, they too were duped, just like the billions of victims around the world.

The author points out that contrary to popular belief, in order for a global conspiracy to work, there is no need for a large number of conspirators. In fact, if the conspiracy stands any chance of success, it is vital that only a few have any knowledge of it. The more people who know, the more likely it is to fail.

The threat level suggested by those running the psychological operation was a lie. It was a fraud designed to fool you into abandoning your inalienable rights and freedoms. The core conspirators objective was to enable the reset of the global economy, the world’s monetary system and its political and social structure, simply to further their own interests.

A society based upon human rights has no rights. Those who think human rights are expendable in emergencies are correct. They are expendable whenever. What they fail to grasp is that inalienable rights can never be extinguished. Throughout this book the consistent unspoken theme is the disregard for our human rights.

We are born with inalienable rights. We are born with the ability to understand the difference between right and wrong. Sociopaths and psychopaths are unable to distinguish between right and wrong because they lack natural human emotional responses. Their egos convince them that they are special and therefore they do not feel the need to observe others rights. For them, only that which serves their purpose has value. Inalienable rights are incomprehensible for the psychopath and the sociopath.

When these people collude their only goal is to serve their own collective interests and deny the rest of us our rights. Throughout our history generations of these abusers have caused untold chaos and human misery in pursuit of their ambitions. They are and always have been the most dangerous threat we have ever faced. Their actions are consistently wrong and, as sovereign human beings with inalienable rights, it is our duty to disarm any undue influence they may hold over anyone.

We have been deceived into imagining we have human rights and in doing so we have neglected our duty to defend humanity’s inalienable rights. Our irresponsible behaviour, apathy and credulity has brought us, most assuredly, to the brink of a global dictatorship.

Whether that malevolent plan succeeds or fails is up to us. If you seek a leader to take responsibility and to stand up against this tyranny then look in the mirror.

This is an important book and the author has allowed the ebook to be downloaded for free from the website

I recommend it for those who are dissatisfied with the government being the “sole source of truth” and want uncensored, well researched information that they can verify for themselves.

The Diary of a New Zealand Scientist 2021

This has to be the best article I’ve read on the vaccine mandates, brought to you by the real news media. I recommend sitting down with a coffee and having a read. It knocks the government’s “safe and effective” vaccine message on the head and explains the thinking behind the globalists’ actions.

BFD, The Diary of a NZ Scientist 2021

Guy Hatchard, PhD

There are three main streams of thought that came together in 2021, all three of which are seeking forms of control, finance, and monopoly.

  • The first is the medical and pharmaceutical establishment with their magic bullet philosophy of manufactured drug-based approaches to health.
  • The second is the technology and media sector and their constant need to innovate.
  • The third sector is found in the machinery of government. Governments wish to take control of every aspect of life, especially the content of education and the permissible methods of healthcare, but more particularly information.

During the pandemic, these three sectors have found each other and their aims have merged. They clearly see mutual advantages. The fly in the ointment is the ‘past’—traditional and cultural values, religious sentiment, and natural approaches to health and well being.

Was this a conspiracy? Probably not, but it was a coming together of like-minded people, who had a very clear vision of a biotechnological future—three classes of people who all shared a common vision. People who had been influenced by popular notions of evolution based solely on competition and survival of the fittest. The idea that the individual and society are somehow always in competition with Nature which they should seek to dominate, known as Social Darwinism—a philosophy that greatly influenced Hitler. 


The mainstream media are serving the medical, pharmaceutical, technological and government sectors.

Who can we trust to inform us?

This is an insight from a book I’m reading called “Pseudopandemic” by Iain Davis regarding the news media:

The only people who had any hope of being properly informed were those who
followed the so called alternative media. This is currently the only place to find real news media.

This is how the term “news media” is used for the remainder of our exploration of the pseudopandemic. The MSM are the “alternative.”
Page 139 of Pseudopandemic.

Pseudopandemic, New Normal Technocracy by Iain Davis

Deception, Self-Deception, & Defactualization : Wherever money is insufficient to bury the truth, ignorance, propaganda, and short memories finish the job.

Questions the NZ media are not asking

For those living in NZ, affected by the lock downs, do you ever watch the daily Covid updates from the government and media? I don’t because the media never ask the questions I want asked.

Lynda Wharton of the NZ Heath Forum has the same questions, after making this observation about the NZ media;

“New Zealand has no independent “fourth estate”, demanding honesty and transparency from power. 
No discerning, educated, passionate, ballsy, annoying (to the politicians) interrogator asking the questions that force a mantle of accountability onto sometimes sloping shoulders.

I long ago stopped watching the 1pm updates.  I literally feel my pulse pounding in my temples if i bear witness to the journalist “questioning” that never strays from the straight and narrow paths of masks, lockdowns and a “safe and effective” holy grail found at the point of a needle.

So here, on a reflective Sunday morning, are the questions I would be asking had my dream to be a journalist come true…

Dear Prime Minister..
1) Why are we still using a PCR test amplified to 40 or 45 cycles to “test” for Covid, when we know (and the CDC and WHO have informed us) that such testing is fraught with a huge majority of false positives?
2) Why did the NZ Government remove our ability to access antibody testing through local labs, at the outset of the pandemic?  (This means we are unable to test to determine if we have naturally occurring immunity from previous exposure or infection).
3) Why is our Medical Council putting the fear of God into any doctor who wishes to prescribe “Mr Ivor Mick Tin” for “off label” prevention or treatment of Covid?  And why are those New Zealanders who have been reduced to importing from overseas, seeing their precious package thrown into the bin at NZ customs?
4) Why are you refusing to discuss the reality of what you are seeing in countries around the world, with New Zealanders?  Why are you not telling them about Israel, UK and USA, where the most heavily Vd populations in the world are seeing massive outbreaks and huge numbers hospitalised and dying….despite at least 2 and now 3 jabs?
5) Why are you not telling New Zealanders that the Vd are highly likely the “super spreaders” now.  With their massive viral load when infected, combined with reduced symptoms when infected, they will go about their lives, out and about and infecting others.
6) Why are you not using your 1pm updates to remind clinicians that ALL changes in health in the weeks following the jab MUST be reported to CARM….as this is a drug that has only provisional consent, and no long history of proof of safety or efficacy.
7) Why are you not helping New Zealanders understand that this is not “just another jab”.  That many of the 58 questions to Pfizer, (including numerous safety and purity questions) asked by Medsafe, remain unanswered, despite the millions of doses now administered here.
8) Why is our Academia not publicly debating ANY of the many issues under scrutiny in far flung corners of the world….including the growing proof of a rapid antibody decline in the few months post jab….setting the stage for the very real concern of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (e.g. the jab changing your immune system in a way which allows the virus easier entry to cells, and a catastrophic immune response).
9) Why are our medical practitioners not calling YOU to account over the millions of severe post V injuries now recorded in databases around the world (VAERS, Yellow Card UK, VigiAccess etc)….and the tens of thousands of post V deaths.
10)  Why do our people live in abject terror of Covid?  So many believe that if they catch it it is tantamount to a death sentence.  Virtually no one understands that mortality is strongly skewed to the elderly and comorbid….and that your average healthy under 60 year old is likely to experience a “bad flu” (or less).

11) Why…when your mantra is “be kind”, are you turning Kiwis against Kiwis?

Your own partner implored us, just this week, to pressure, cajole, punish, separate and do whatever else it takes to get someone over the jab line.

12) Why, when 30,000 anguished comments landed on your face book call out for “adverse reactions”….did you simply have them wiped away with a click of a button, like dog dirt on the sole of your favourite shoes?
13) Why are our children now being lined up for the V, with NO discussion, debate, or public consultation, such as we have seen in many other corners of the world?  Instead being presented as an obvious, commonsense “fait accompli”, which it most clearly is not.
14) Why are parents not given the information they need to make an INFORMED consent for their precious children….and while we are on that subject, how come our scatty, pubescent 12 year olds are deemed fit to make that choice FOR THEMSELVES EVEN OVERRIDING PARENTAL OPPOSITION.

Dear Prime Minister….I could literally monopolise your 1pm update from now to Christmas, but in the interest of my own sanity i will stop here.
I live in hope that one day, just ONE member of the New Zealand press will have the courage to step up and ask you even ONE of these questions.”

– Lynda Wharton, NZ Heath Forum

Note:- For those on Facebook who would like to join the NZ Heath Forum, it’s an invite only group. If you want to join, copy and paste the link to the group into a message to them, and then answer their questions.

Another questionabout deaths from Delta compared to deaths from Pfizer.

The media have breathlessly announced two deaths from the Delta variant, one was in their nineties and the other had a pre-existing condition.

Why are the government and media so worried about a two deaths from a weak variant of the Covid virus SARS-COV2 virus while ignoring 28 deaths from the vaccine?

Here are Medsafe’s injury and mortality figures from Pfizer, up to 4th September 2021:

  • 602 serious Adverse Effects Following Immunisation (AEFI)
  • 28 deaths are from the vaccine.

The figures are spun so that you have to deduct them from the total, for example Medsafe writes it as, “26 of these deaths are unlikely related to the COVID-19 vaccine.” That means 28 deaths are caused by the vaccine.

There will be more deaths, preventable if people had informed consent and could do a proper risk / benefit analysis of the risk of the illness versus the risk of vaccine harm.

Here’s the link to Medsafe’s website:

Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines: Safety Report #27 – 4 September 2021

Lockdown Knockdown

My daughter and I were travelling down the Auckland motorway for my cancer treatment a few months ago when I spied some guys on an overhead bridge holding a sign saying “lockdowns don’t work.” They saw me wave and cheer as the car approached. I’ve never agreed with these constant lock downs.

We’ve been told through slogans and mantras that the reason for the lock downs is to “unite against Covid” and to “stay home, save lives.”

Is that really the reason?

Well not according to The European Commission.

We were to remain susceptible to infection so the roll-out of the planned mass immunisation programme could take place before we all had a chance to mount a natural immune response.

Here it is in their own words.

5. It would be possible to vaccinate on a large scale.

Once an mRNA vaccine has been approved, which could take 12-18 months, it should be easy to scale up production. Because the manufacturing process is shorter than for other vaccines – Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding estimates a few months rather than 1-2 years for conventional vaccines – there is potential for these vaccines to be scaled up quickly. This is useful in the context of coronavirus, which will likely need mass immunisation programmes.

‘I think we will need a very high population coverage, but it depends a little bit on the countries and the epidemiology,’ said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding. ‘In the countries where coronavirus has been spreading very fast, we also expect that there’s many people who have been in contact with the virus and who have actually mounted a natural immune response. But on the other hand, if you look at Germany, for example, right now we’re all at home, barred, and not allowed to leave the house except for necessities.

The population therefore remains susceptible to infection, she says. ‘And so here, you would definitely need to think about vaccinating the whole population.

‘That’s why also these vaccines are of interest, because you could probably manage that, while, with other vaccines, it’s harder to produce these quantities (in a short period of time).’

EU Horizon, the EU Research & Innovation Magazine, Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines

Seven months after that article was written, The EU purchased 300 million doses of the vaccine as soon as it became available. Herd immunity would have ruined that vaccine market, their plans for Immunisation 2030 (IA2030) and their phase 3 mRNA trial mentioned in “4. There are a lot of unknowns,” where humans are the guinea pigs.

The cabal in charge of our governments didn’t want to keep us safe, they wanted to keep us susceptible.

The reason our governments are marketing and mandating these so-called vaccines is because they know they only have about two years before we all develop herd immunity.

The message is that we now need vaccines to develop this. That is why the World Health Organisation changed the definition of “herd immunity.” (See below)

If I’ve read this wrong please tell me. This is the 19th day of my fourth lockdown and I am angry. We’re locked up while our business is being affected and our human rights removed for a mass immunisation agenda. Please share this widely. Let me know if the link gets removed, I’ve downloaded the web page.


Dr Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding Member of the IMI Scientific Committee and head of Microbiology at Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany. Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines

The EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine on 9th November 2020 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “90%” effective. What’s Not Being Said About Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine

Herd Immunity: The definition of herd immunity was changed by the WHO sometime between June 9th and November 13th, 2020,

Wayback machine, WHO former definition of herd immunity

You can read the new WHO definition here. Herd immunity is altered so that it can now only be achieved through mass vaccination;

“To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population. One of the aims with working towards herd immunity is to keep vulnerable groups who cannot get vaccinated (e.g. due to health conditions like allergic reactions to the vaccine) safe and protected from the disease.”

WHO, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity

If this was true, how come the world got over the Spanish Flu in two years? It’s obvious that the unscientific, untrustworthy World Health Organisation has been corrupted by the vaccine cabal.

Now we can see why the Great Barrington Declaration, written on October 4, 2020 by three of the world’s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the vulnerable and minimizing harms to society, has been met with such venom.

WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website

The Narrow Window

According to the World Economic Forum, COVID-19 is part of the four building blocks of the Great Reset. Is this a future we all want? Top down rule from an unelected elite?

The WEF is mostly known for its an annual meeting at the end of January in Davos. When you hear the Davos men say “build back better,” they’re using one of the slogans.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world,” said Klaus Schwab, founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum. Prince Charles said this is “a golden opportunity.”

WEF, The Great Reset

Mandated mask wearing, vaccines and Covid passports will be part of it unless we all push back.

WEF, COVID-19: The 4 building blocks of the Great Reset

BBC News: What is the Great Reset – and how did it get hijacked by conspiracy theories?

Court case won after existance of SARS-COV2 not proven

Are you being pressured to take this so-called Covid vaccine? Are your children under threat?

I’m going to tell you about a case won in Ottawa, Canada.

But first, here’s information that will assist you to go on the offensive.

I hope this helps.

Know your rights at work:

Transcript :

So it’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove in court.

Victory in Alberta, Canada

WE CAN WIN! Patrick King is a proud father of two, Freedom Fighter and Patriot who took on the powerful government in Alberta, and WON!

Freedom Fighter Court VICTORY! Ends Masking, Shots, Quarantine

Fined $1200 for violating the Covid-19 Public Health Act, for his defence Patrick King requested the isolation of the SARS-COV2 virus. He wanted it isolated, and not in a lab setting or Covid PCR test. The judge allowed him to subpoena Deena Hinshaw, the Chief Medical Officer of Health for the province of Alberta. He won the case when Deena Hinshaw’s lawyers said, “Mr King is requesting evidence we cannot give.” They didn’t have any material evidence to fight the case and he won.

If it can be done in Canada, it can be done in New Zealand, providing the courts are still administering justice.

We could file a Freedom of Information request and take Jacinda Adern and Dr Ashley Bloomfield, the Director-General of Health in NZ to court for what they’re doing in the name of health.

When lawyer Sue Grey took the NZ government to court challenging the legality of NZ’s vaccine roll out, she won her case against the government rolling out a trial vaccination program under emergency, when there was no emergency.

This corrupt government promptly changed the Medicines Act the next day, stating it was an out-dated law from the 1980s. Yet they are currently using a law from 1953 to implement restrictions on New Zealanders under the health act. The corruption within this current government runs deep, and people need to be very careful about being overly compliant, as there are other options which work.

We could try again, challenging their actions by demanding proof for the isolation of the SARS-COV2 virus – and we would win. They are enforcing acts for something that doesn’t exist.

There is no record of Covid-19 isolated anywhere, by anyone, ever.

The University of Otago, NZ claimed to have “isolated the COVID-19 virus” but has no record of it.

Millionaire offers $1.2 M reward to anyone providing an isolated sample of the COVID-19 virus


Proceedings filed in the High Court questioning the legality of the vaccine roll out.