Double-speak?

Before she was sworn in as prime minister, Ardern talked about wanting her Government to feel different. “I want people to feel that it’s open, that it’s listening and that it’s going to bring kindness back,” she said.  It sounds great after three decades of austerity and neo-liberalism. 

Jacinda Adern knows how to be appealing, her qualification is in public relations, and she’s good at it, very glib and quick with empathy and talking points.

I know these are unprecedented times, but Jacinda did talk about being known by deeds, so let’s look at those deeds.  If you don’t like bad news, click on the Time cover, read all the lovely things the globalist media have to say about Jacinda, and go no further.  If you believe in accountability, read on.

Jacinda Arden Time

From the 26th March, New Zealand was wrapped in Covid-19 yellow tape when a level 4 lock down was imposed.  On the advice of the health ministers, NZ should only have gone to level 2 for a month – but we didn’t.  Instead, just three days later, the Government moved to Level 3, and in another two days went to Level 4.

The lock down was done illegally and the government and police knew that.  Leaked emails showed that police believed, on the advice from Crown Law that there was very little they could do, other than ask people nicely to comply with the edicts.  Yet businesses were closed on Police orders, and shopkeepers were threatened with arrest – all without any legal basis.

The term for this is “ultra vires,”  a Latin phrase for “an act which requires legal authority but is done without it.”

UltraViresImage

Worst of all, people were made to die alone.  I’m not talking about Covid deaths.  The Ministry of Health failed to allow for their own legal directive that allowed for compassionate grounds and exception circumstances in allowing people to visit dying relatives.

“Where is my boy, where is my boy?” a dying father asked.  His son, one of the 24 declined relatives, had to go to the High Court to gain access to his father.  Justice Tracey Walker, the judge that ruled Oliver Christiansen could leave quarantine to see his father, said the health officials’ decisions to decline permission were legally flawed.  In her decision released on Friday, Justice Walker said the handling of Christiansen’s case “had the hallmarks of an automatic rejection.”

Man in quarantine appeals to Government to see dying wife

Covid 19 coronavirus: Kiwi in LA begs for quarantine exemption to see dying dad in Christchurch

Denied visits for dying relatives: support for reviews of decisions

There had been 24 requests to visit a relative dying or close to dying as of April 30, a spokesperson for the prime minister said.   None of those requests were granted by the Ministry of Health, but while people died alone in the midst of this lock down, the Minister of Health went on a mountain bike ride, a drive to the beach and moved house.

New Zealand health minister demoted after beach visit broke lockdown rules

It was also turned into a nation of snitches after a hotline was setup for COVID-19 compliance.  Ardern minions have filed “4,200 reports to police”, reporting on their neighbours who breach New Zealand’s house arrest rules.  As The NZ Herald quipped, “curtain-twitchers outing members of the public crashed the new police reporting site within an hour of it going live yesterday.” Neighbour devouring neighbour under a cloud of suspicion and fear, in an eerie echo of the kind of public denouncing, carried out by Soviet Stasi, and Nazi Gestapo, collaborators.

The document dump

The fact that top health officials had recommended New Zealand move to Alert Level 2, and remain there for up to 30 days was revealed in the document dump that happened late of Friday afternoon of the 8th May.

Dumping documents late in the week is a long used practice of avoiding scrutiny, as Ministers head home for the weekend.  The hope and intention is that media attention will have largely moved on by the following Monday.

While this was done, Adern slapped a gag order on her ministers. Newshub was leaked an internal memo sent to all ministers from the Prime Minister’s office instructing them not to speak to the media about the document dump.

The COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill

Despite Adern’s review of the legally flawed decisions where family members were denied access to their dying relatives, the Minister of Health has been granted unbridled power.  New Zealand has essentially been turned into a police state.

Hours before New Zealand moved to lock down level 2 on the 14th May, the COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill was rammed through Parliament, granting police or “enforcement officers” the right to come into a home or place of business without a warrant if they reasonably believe virus-related orders are being breached.  The wording of the bill may lead to mandated forced vaccinations.  It was done in less than two days and with no select committee hearings.

Covid-19 Health bill

These are the facts.  Now for my opinion.  “Know us by our deeds,” said Jacinda Adern a year after Christchurch.  She loves to be inclusive and say “us.”  Who is “us?”

The only thing I’d agree with Adern on is that her government feels different.  It certainly does.  There’s been no kindness.  To me, the Orwellian term “double-speak” comes to mind.

As Jordan Peterson well articulates, “Kindness is the excuse that social justice warriors use when they want to exercise control over what other people think and say.”

You know what it looks like to me?  A socialist working in cahoots with complicit, corporate owned media to get mandated vaccines for Agenda 2030.

Call me a conspiracy theorist all you like – I want to be wrong!


Links and leaks

Illegality:
LEAKED: Crown Law Advice to Police

New Zealand’s own Amy Brooke has penned a damning critique of Ardern’s so-called “kindness:” Speccy Puts the Boot into the Princess
Ardern’s much-vaunted “compassion” didn’t extend to the families of the ill and dying, either.

Coronavirus: Jacinda Ardern asks for review of all cases where family members were denied permission to visit relatives  (Wasn’t her carefree health minister reporting to her?)

Jacinda, house arrest

New Zealanders begin to devour each other while Jacinda Ardern smiles and waves at the nation she’s put under house arrest

Covid-19 coronavirus: Kiwis file 4200 reports to police of people flouting lockdown

Gagging ministers:

Doublespeak document dump while schooling Ministers on avoiding accountability

Leak: PM gags ministers on COVID-19 response

Creating a police state:

Even the UN Human Rights Commission is deeply concerned about COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill


I’m reminded of a song by ACDC; ‘Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.’  (ACDC’s album cover shows people with their eyes covered.)

Keeping faith with New Zealand?

Jacinda Adern has been praised for her empathetic leadership during this Covid-19 crisis.  Should she be?  Who has she been kind to?  Why is she giving arbitrary orders to NZ that are at odds with the government’s instructions to the Police? 

Adern said that under the Covid-19 level 2 rules, there could not be more than ten people in a place of worship.  But yesterday, on the 20th May, a leaked Police document showed that places of worship can be open with a limit of 100 people.  What’s going on?  The inconsistency hasn’t been reported by the media.  Where are the reporters demanding an explanation?

You might not care about faith, but ask yourself, who is she going to discriminate against next?

I’m going to call this a big, sloppy, steaming pile of bovine excrement.  We should pray for the government, but keep faith with a higher agency.  Perhaps the churches should meet in bars.  Bars are allowed 100 people.

Sign of the times

The NZ police can’t shut a church down – it will be going against their guidelines!

Leaked Police doc

 


Links: This is just in after my blog post yesterday.  It’s good to see at least one media outlet finally reporting on this.

Covid-19: Police give green-light to large church services, contradicting PM’s stance

Join the dots – Jacinda Adern, the WHO and Agenda 2030

For those wondering why Jacinda Adern passed the Covid-19 Health Response Bill, granting herself power that no political leader should have, here’s the clip of her selling NZ to the UN.  I’ve been watching her and keeping tabs on the Agenda 2030 stuff.  Here she is, in her own words, talking about the Sustainable Development Goals.

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (4 minutes)

I’ve put the contents of her speech in the notes section.  Unfortunately, comments have been disabled but you can express your feelings with like or dislike.  Me, I wish they had a ‘hate’ button.

“Leaving no one behind,” Adern says in her speech.  That’s interesting, that’s just what the World Health Organisation says:  Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind.

In the WHO’s own words, “The IA 2030 strategy—to extend the benefits of vaccines to everyone, everywhere—is underpinned by four core principles: it puts people in the center, is led by countries, implemented through broad partnerships, and driven by data.”

See if you can find the four core principles embedded in Jacinda’s pretty little speech.

Did you know the World Health Organisation even had a global immunisation agenda?  It works in with ID2020.  It kind of throws current events into perspective, doesn’t it?

My question is, what about all the people who won’t go along with this, the people who will refuse vaccines?  Mandated vaccinations is where I fear this is going.  Is that why Adern included “compliance officers” in the Covid-19 Health Response Bill for the plandemic pandemic, which sets up the legal framework for future alert levels?

“He waka eke noa,” she ends with, meaning “We’re all in this together.”  Waka is a canoe.  Is New Zealand up shit creek?

Shit creek

 


Notes

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Adern starts off with a Maori greeting and talks about a better future together …
“Together is an important word for us in NZ.  It says a shared vision.  It puts people at the heart of policy decisions.  It’s about building a happy, healthy, prosperous NZ, which everyone can benefit from.  Togetherness is the core of our strategy to deliver well-being and recognises that the spheres of our lives, our environment, our people, our economy interconnected and interdependent. 

These same principles lie at the heart of Sustainable Development Goals.  I’m proud to present NZ’s first voluntary national review on progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.  The report is a demonstration, I hope, of our strong commitment to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  

“We are innovative and resilient but we also have our share of challenges.  and one of these is to ensure that all NZ’ers achieve a decent standard of living and have a strong sense of well-being.  Leaving no one behind requires openness and honesty about the challenges we face and it is an approach we brought to our first review of the Sustainable Development Goals and to our domestic agenda. 

As we transition to a sustainable, productive and inclusive economy, we do require a deeper understanding of the groups who will be most affected so that we can ensure that the right strategies are in place to support them.  It does require us to do things differently.  It requires solid disaggregated data to base decisions on and we’ve developed a new suite of statistical indicators.  They’re called ‘indicators Aotearoa NZ.’  They go beyond economics to incorporate social, cultural and environmental measures. 

The indicators will provide a clearer picture of New Zealand’s overall well-being as well as a measure of our progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.  Alongside this, we have developed a new analytical framework that emphasises the diversity of outcomes meaningful for NZ’ers.  This Living Standards Framwework, as it’s called, will be part of our toolkit to analyse and assess policy options that enhance and support NZ’ers achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

NZ is strongly committed to being a leader and a constructive partner nationally and internationally, and the global effort to create a more sustainable and inclusive economy.  We recognise that all Sustainable Development Goals are connected and cannot be achieved by our governments alone.  This report, I hope, also highlights our government’s priorities including working towards eradicating poverty, improving mental health, addressing inequalities, thriving in a digital age and transitioning to a lower emission sustainable economy.  These initiatives are crucial to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.  We know the cumulative value of small incremental steps, the day to day decisions and actions that we make a difference and change people’s lives.”

“In the spirit of goal 17, we are committed to partnership.”

Note: Agenda 2030 Goal 17 is the “Global Partnership for the Sustainable Development Goals.”  It’s worldwide socialism – with wealth transfer and a global tax.  Part of their plans, officially dubbed “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals,” aims to reduce inequality worldwide by forcing individual governments and citizens alike to share their wealth under the guidance of a one world government.


Links

New Zealand MP Simon O’Connor expose the world coup and warns of absolute tyranny covid agenda

World Health Organisation: There are six WHO regions.

Here’s a presentation for the European Region: – Towards a roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the WHO European Region.

Health 2020, It goes into all the Agenda 2030 stuff, and when you get to slide 5 you’ll see that “Localization of the 2030 Agenda” takes place in the UN room where the UN, the World Health Organisation and the technocrats devised ID2020, a universal biometric ID for everyone.

UN Agenda 2030 Revealed: They Want A One World Government

Sustainable Development Goals. Click on each icon, then click on ‘Targets and Indicators.’  There are 169 of them.

That “well-being” Jacinda spoke of?  Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3 relates to ‘Good Health and Well-Being,’ hence the “Well-Being Budget.”

The Well-Being Budget, 2019: Jacinda Ardern’s ‘kooky’ plans to spend $26BILLION on a ‘wellbeing’ Budget will devastate New Zealand and force Kiwis to flee to Australia – and even the mum on the cover has crossed the ditch due to cost of living

A right major crisis

Has the so-called Covid-19 (Wuhan Flu) pandemic been exploited so the globalists can gain control?  Is this major crisis being used to bring our nations down?

all-we-need-is-the-right-major-crisis-and-the-nations-will-accept-the-new-world-order-david-rockefeller

The globalists are often referred to as ‘they.’  Who are the ‘they?’  I’m talking of men like Nick Rockefeller, who told Aaron Russo their plans to get us all chipped, David Rockefeller (founder of the Trilateral Commission) and Bill Gates who wants us all to have “the vaccine.”

I wonder if at some time in the future, Gates’ vaccine will tie in somehow with our “carbon footprint?”  Bill Gates has a crisp formula for C02, which we all exhale and will be paying for.  This is what he came up with, which just goes to show that money does not equal intelligence.  To him, people are just numbers.

Bill Gates Technocracy measurement

Bill Gate’s formula

The technocrats want to destroy our economic system and replace it with “energy credits.”  Do you see the link between that and our “carbon footprint?”  Essentially, it’s a license to live.

What drives these men and their evil ideas?  It can’t be greed, they’ve already got all the money.  They’ve propagated the idea that “there’s too many people on the planet” and they have a desire for population control.  These men are eugenists who want to limit the number of people so that we’re in “perpetual balance with nature.”  You might recognise the phrase “perpetual balance” from the creepy Georgia Guidestones.  It’s also in the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

technocracy unamericanThey’ve pinned their faith on technocracy, an idea for a scientific utopia that got soundly quashed in the 1930’s as un-American.  It came back to life in the Carter Administration under Zbigniew Brzezinski, when in 1973, together with David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission embarked on a New International Economic Order based on Technocracy.  Brzezinski called this the “Technetronic Era” in his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages.”

These men play a long game, like Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War.”  They’ve been plotting for nearly a century.  Like a frog boiled in a pot, we don’t notice, because it spans generations. But their ritual demands they tell us.  How would they do that in a way that we won’t be alerted?

A scenario is created where the truth is told, but it can be ridiculed and mocked.  The messenger is wild eyed.  They imply he’s a “conspiracy theorist.”  There, we’ve been told.  From that point on, they expect us to automatically denounce and discount it.

In this clip, the man is warning about the Trilateral Commission.  Since he’s talking about them, we should ignore the canned laughter and find out more.

The truth in plain sight, 1981 (Aired on TV)

Trilateral logoThe Trilateral Commission

The idea for population control came from the Trilateral Commission, an organisation created at the behest of David Rockefeller in 1973.  David Rockefeller, longtime chairman of the Rockefeller family-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank and head of his family’s global corporate empire, was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as an off-shoot of the Council on Foreign Relations. The North American group is based in Washington.

I recommend the book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood.  If you’re not into reading, here’s his video clip: The Trilateral Commission and Technocracy.

Wood-Technocracy-Rising-624x468

In light of current events with the Covid-19 crisis, I found this quote interesting: “One of the biggest problems facing technocrats today is that there are just too many people …  One need only look at the Georgia Guidestones to find the technocrat’s optimum population. Of course we still have mandatory vaccinations, fluoridated water, abortion (on demand if they have their way), chemtrails, etc.. Nothing in the technocrat’s world happens by coincidence- everything is part of an overall plan. This includes crashing the economy.”  Source: The Technocracy- The Trilateral Commission- The Council on Foreign Affairs & the Deep State

David Rockefeller

Rockefeller was aided by a complicit media for 40 years.

In a National Press Club speech, he said: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” From his biography Memoirs, published in 2002

David Rockefeller’s leaked speech 1991

The media never reported on their activities.  Writers who stepped into the breach to report on them were labelled “conspiracy theorists.”  Have their warnings come true?

illuminati

Earlier warnings

Make Mine Freedom a 1948 Cartoon on “isms” and American Freedom


Related posts:

The anatomy of the beast
Crashing from a great height

Overheard on the hot mic, “the uh, covid-19 case fatality rate is like 0.3”

Do you wear a mask because of this so-called Covid-19 pandemic?

Off the record, you don’t need to!

Here’s a conversation that was recorded on a hot mic at the White House Press Conference on April 20th between Chief White House Correspondent for Fox News, John Roberts and a colleague;

 “You can take off your mask here, the uh case fatality rate is like 0.1 to 0.3”

“That’s reassuring.”

“Everybody here has been vaccinated anyway.”

“USC and LA County Public Health came out with a study, they found that there were 7,000 cases in California.  But they really believe there were anywhere from 221,000 to 442,000 people who were infected.”

“Really?”

“Yeah.”

“So that makes it 0.1 to 0.3 There’s a study they came out with, or?”

“Yeah, it just came out today.”

“So it suggests the case fatality rate is what? A tenth of what it seems to be.”

“Puts it right in line with the flu.”  

“Yeah, exactly.  That’s what it is.”  

“So it was a hoax …”

“I don’t think it was a hoax.”

“Ha Ha Ha.”   

THE REAL HOAX: REPORTER CAUGHT ON TAPE

John Roberts

John Roberts, Chief White House Correspondent

Did you hear that on the mainstream news?  Now why didn’t Fox News report that, if that’s what their Chief White House Correspondent maintained?


The figures John Roberts cited were born out by a pair of California doctors who argued for lifting the Covid-19 restrictions.

In the clip, Erickson (one of the doctors) asserts that there is only a “0.3 chance of dying from COVID in the state of California,” prompting him to ask, “Does that necessitate sheltering in place? Does that necessitate shutting down medical systems? Does that necessitate people being out of work?”

Unfortunately they’ve been scrubbed off the internet by the technology giants …

Their viral video was removed for violating YouTube’s Terms of Service, after racking up 5 million views.

You can watch it here.  The deleted news report was by 23ABC News in Bakersfield, California.

YouTube Deletes Video Of California Doctors Who Argued For Lifting COVID-19 Restrictions


* I think it’s time to use alternative media such as Bitchute instead of YouTube, as much as possible.  Also, try a different search engine instead of Google. I use DuckDuckGo.  Other search engines are Brave, Dogpile or StartPage.  StartPage also offers a proxy for those who want to not just search, but browse, the web in full privacy.


Covid-19 stats for California: population of 39.512 million as of July 1, 2019.  Number of Covid-19 cases as at May 7th 2020: 62,512.  Deaths: 2585.  You do the math.

See my post about the ‘Empty hospitals and the CDC secret ‘recipe’


Links

“So It Was A Hoax?” – Fox News’ John Roberts Caught On Hot Mic Discussing COVID-19 Mortality Rate With Technician

YouTube Takes Down Viral Doctor Video Debunking Quarantine Lock-Downs

Here’s another hot mic, from 2014.  Can you really trust the reporters? “We’re Screwed”: MSM Caught on Hot Mic at White House Ebola Press Briefing

Your Mask Is Making You Meaner, Dumber, More Afraid & Less Safe

Covid-19, the economic pain to come

As a small business we’re trying to navigate our way through the Covid-19 shut-down.  Being an essential service (Information Technology) we’re trading under extremely limited circumstances.  We may survive, but it’s impossible to do any forecasting right now and I have no confidence in the government.

Coronavirus edicartoon-3-3_2020-03-02

I’m questioning this so-called pandemic and the government’s actions, or inactions.

On the 25th March, NZ went to level 4 lock down.  We only had two days to prepare for it.

Was this whole thing necessary?  Does it fit the definition of a pandemic?  How is it different from a Sars outbreak?

“How bad is this?  How evil is this one?” asks Duncan Garner, TV news presenter for Newshub.

“It’s not the most evil that we’ve had. Sars and Mers coronaviruses were more severe. They killed, were set up to kill a lot more people …” replied Doctor Petousis-Harris.

Doctor Helen Petousis-Harris is the director of the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, as well as an Associate Professor at Auckland University.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_x8yDiifig

If Sars and Mers were worse, why was New Zealand shut down over this coronavirus, which most people recover from?

I don’t understand why our small South Pacific nation went to a level 4 lock-down when we’ve only had 19 deaths – all over 70 and all with pre-existing conditions.

Another thing I don’t understand – why did Jacinda give priority to the extreme abortion law in the midst of the so-called Coronavirus pandemic?  It doesn’t make sense.

Why wasn’t the government paying attention to the looming “medical crises” instead?  I have yet to hear the media ask this question.

It even turns out the Government was formally told by Dr Ashley Bloomfield, the Director General of Health, to completely close the borders in February.  When they finally closed the door, the virus had walked in and spread.

Business before the house, 17th March 2020

Why was he ignored?  Are there other nefarious and unreported agendas at work that we’re not aware of?

If this draconian level 4 lock down isn’t justified, then Adern is guilty of crashing the economy and she should be held accountable.

An article today said “Jacinda Ardern is sued over coronavirus lockdown and is accused of imposing strict measures in New Zealand ‘for her political gain.’

I don’t like their chances of successfully suing her.

Unfortunately the voting booth is the only choice we have and even then it’s a poor choice.  The contenders are globalists who either serve the UN or China.  We don’t have a true political choice or a voice in the media.  If Jacinda is voted out she’ll be off to a glittering career at the UN – just like socialist Helen Clark, her mentor and predecessor.

There’s an interesting article by Sir Bob Jones that is critical of Jacinda’s inept handling of this crisis.  Jones said, “Contrary to the Jacinda-obssessed non-critical media, New Zealand hasn’t done very well.  We’ve wrongly followed overseas practices to the letter.  We need not have gone that far and the economic cost will be enormous.”

Mike’s Minute: Have we overreacted to all of this?

HDPA: Australia’s figures suggest we’ve gone too hard with lockdown

NOTE, 10th May 2020

The government proactively dumped hundreds of documents late on Friday 8th May, and in an email obtained by RNZ, the prime minister’s office gagged her ministers by telling them not to do interviews.

In a 20 March document, top health officials recommended New Zealand move to alert level 2, and remain there for up to 30 days.  But just three days later, the government moved to level 3, and in another two days went to level 4.

Also, Adern wanted New Zealand to be on alert level 2-3 for two years!

Source: RNZ, Covid-19: Government need to explain response after documents released – National

I would like to know

  • why Jacinda Adern imposed a gag order after the document dump,
  • why she took New Zealand to lock down level 4 when she was told to go to level 2
  • why she ignored Dr Ashley Bloomfield, the Director General of Health, when he told her to completely close the borders in February
  • and why she wanted New Zealand to be on alert level 2-3 for two years!
Transparent-Govt-meme-1

meme of the day: thebfd.co.nz / The BFD Credit: Alex Davis

 


Links

The coming economic crisis and it’s political consequences.

Govt yet to figure out how to pay the COVID-19 bill

‘Saint Jacinda’ Ardern’s lockdown has not silenced her critics

We allowed the virus to be walked into the country

10th May 2020

Comment: The cynical and arrogant gagging order from PM’s office

Leak: PM Jacinda Ardern gags ministers speaking on COVID-19 8/5/2020 – Tova O’Brien speaking from parliament.

Empty hospitals and the CDC secret ‘recipe’

Corona flagLast week, the day New Zealand went into full lock down, I was shocked at the turn of events – but not afraid of the Coronavirus.  My daughter and son-in-law felt that I was not taking it seriously enough.  I told them I would obey the lock down, but I had questions, and I felt the cure was going to be worse than the virus itself. 

It’s been a week now, and I’ve been listening to what the journalists have to say.  I’m sure we’ve all seen the footage of busy hospitals fighting the Coronavirus pandemic.  But there are reports coming from the USA, Ireland and Germany about empty hospitals.

Where are all the Coronavirus patients?  What’s going on?
Video: Americans Ask Why Are Hundreds Of Hospitals Are Empty? #FilmYourHospital Goes Viral
The video starts with a citizen journalist at St James Hospital Dublin, saying: “There is no testing going on!  Wake up, people!  Wake bloody well up – there is no testing going on in these tents!”

The next clip is by German journalist Billy Six in Berlin, Germany.  It has English sub-titles.

Billy Six

March 28 at 5:43 AM.  They’re at Charite Hospital, Berlin: “Charite Hospital sent us into Virchow Hospital … claiming all Corona cases of Berlin would be here … Emergency situation described in media doesn’t exist here.”

Why then is there mass hysteria everywhere?

Two years ago, I learned about the tactics the CDC employed through the media from a news-piece in February 2018, which showed a false flag in Los Angeles in operation, so people would go and get flu shots.

LA Times False Flag Operation Exposed

The news reports said:

“OC Global can no longer accept any ambulances.”

“California hospitals face a’ war zone’ of flu patients – and are setting up tents to treat them.”

When the reporter from Highwire Talk went to check, she found the hospitals were empty!  So why the alarmist talk about emergencies and triage units?

The CDC admitted they were doing this, and Highwire Talk showed the CDC’s “recipe” for fostering public interest and big vaccine demand.

CDC recipe

So based on that experience, shouldn’t news releases from places like the CDC be treated as advertorials for pharmaceutical companies until they’re investigated?

Note, the CDC was part of Event 201, a Coronavirus pandemic simulation run by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Gates Foundation that began six weeks before the outbreak of this Coronavirus.

After that drill, Members of Congress dumped their stocks.

Is the CDC (Centre for Disease Control) employing the same cynical scare tactics through our main stream media so the world will demand a vaccine?  Are we being played?


Here’s a news article showing the same hospital being used in two separate places!

Twitter, same hospital

Can we trust the media, given reports like this?  Are they being our eyes and ears, or are they simply propagating news releases from places like the CDC?  Who are they working for, wittingly or unwittingly?

“Watch out” came the warning from Germany.  “Wake up” came the warning from Ireland.

Media


Links

LA Times False Flag Operation Exposed

German journalist Billy Six, Medicine vs Media: There is no dangerous corona pandemic, translated from German: “In a night-and-fog action, governments and the media-industrial complex have cut citizens’ freedom rights. “As protection against corona plague”, they say. The controlled blown-up global economy is to be vaccinated with new mega -, better tera loans. Two days of tours in Berlin’s most important hospitals show that there is no medical disaster here. And through the free media, more and more critical doctors are turning to the public – to warn.  But not of the virus…

Source: ⚠️Werden wir alle verarscht Billy Six *GESPIEGELT* – *keine NEWS verpassen Channel abonnieren*

CBS News blames ‘editing mistake’ after footage from Italian hospital appears in report on New York coronavirus crisis