World government

A right major crisis

Has the so-called Covid-19 (Wuhan Flu) pandemic been exploited so the globalists can gain control?  Is this major crisis being used to bring our nations down?

all-we-need-is-the-right-major-crisis-and-the-nations-will-accept-the-new-world-order-david-rockefeller

The globalists are often referred to as ‘they.’  Who are the ‘they?’  I’m talking of men like Nick Rockefeller, who told Aaron Russo their plans to get us all chipped, David Rockefeller (founder of the Trilateral Commission) and Bill Gates who wants us all to have “the vaccine.”

I wonder if at some time in the future, Gates’ vaccine will tie in somehow with our “carbon footprint?”  Bill Gates has a crisp formula for C02, which we all exhale and will be paying for.  This is what he came up with, which just goes to show that money does not equal intelligence.  To him, people are just numbers.

Bill Gates Technocracy measurement

Bill Gate’s formula

The technocrats want to destroy our economic system and replace it with “energy credits.”  Do you see the link between that and our “carbon footprint?”  Essentially, it’s a license to live.

What drives these men and their evil ideas?  It can’t be greed, they’ve already got all the money.  They’ve propagated the idea that “there’s too many people on the planet” and they have a desire for population control.  These men are eugenists who want to limit the number of people so that we’re in “perpetual balance with nature.”  You might recognise the phrase “perpetual balance” from the creepy Georgia Guidestones.  It’s also in the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

technocracy unamericanThey’ve pinned their faith on technocracy, an idea for a scientific utopia that got soundly quashed in the 1930’s as un-American.  It came back to life in the Carter Administration under Zbigniew Brzezinski, when in 1973, together with David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission embarked on a New International Economic Order based on Technocracy.  Brzezinski called this the “Technetronic Era” in his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages.”

These men play a long game, like Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War.”  They’ve been plotting for nearly a century.  Like a frog boiled in a pot, we don’t notice, because it spans generations. But their ritual demands they tell us.  How would they do that in a way that we won’t be alerted?

A scenario is created where the truth is told, but it can be ridiculed and mocked.  The messenger is wild eyed.  They imply he’s a “conspiracy theorist.”  There, we’ve been told.  From that point on, they expect us to automatically denounce and discount it.

In this clip, the man is warning about the Trilateral Commission.  Since he’s talking about them, we should ignore the canned laughter and find out more.

The truth in plain sight, 1981 (Aired on TV)

Trilateral logoThe Trilateral Commission

The idea for population control came from the Trilateral Commission, an organisation created at the behest of David Rockefeller in 1973.  David Rockefeller, longtime chairman of the Rockefeller family-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank and head of his family’s global corporate empire, was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as an off-shoot of the Council on Foreign Relations. The North American group is based in Washington.

I recommend the book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood.  If you’re not into reading, here’s his video clip: The Trilateral Commission and Technocracy.

Wood-Technocracy-Rising-624x468

In light of current events with the Covid-19 crisis, I found this quote interesting: “One of the biggest problems facing technocrats today is that there are just too many people …  One need only look at the Georgia Guidestones to find the technocrat’s optimum population. Of course we still have mandatory vaccinations, fluoridated water, abortion (on demand if they have their way), chemtrails, etc.. Nothing in the technocrat’s world happens by coincidence- everything is part of an overall plan. This includes crashing the economy.”  Source: The Technocracy- The Trilateral Commission- The Council on Foreign Affairs & the Deep State

David Rockefeller

Rockefeller was aided by a complicit media for 40 years.

In a National Press Club speech, he said: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” From his biography Memoirs, published in 2002

David Rockefeller’s leaked speech 1991

The media never reported on their activities.  Writers who stepped into the breach to report on them were labelled “conspiracy theorists.”  Have their warnings come true?

illuminati

Earlier warnings

65 Year Old Cartoon reveals past, present and future of Agenda 2030: Make Mine Freedom a 1948 Cartoon on “isms” and American Freedom


Related posts:

The anatomy of the beast
Crashing from a great height

Vaxed – vexing questions about the Coronavirus pandemic

I wrote this March 2020 when we’d just gone into lock down in New Zealand.  While I agreed with the government’s measures and accepted that Covid-19 is a genuine pandemic, I felt something was wrong.  To coin a verse from Shakespeare’s Hamlet; “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”

That doesn’t mean I ignored or minimised the threat of Covid-19 – but I had questions.  I said, “I’d rather ask the questions now and look silly in six months time, rather than keep silent about some things I’m discerning behind the scenes.”  Forewarned is forearmed.

The bad smell emanating from Denmark is a mandatory vaccination for Covid-19 once it becomes available.  Yes, Denmark had passed legislation for it to be mandatory!

Denmark rushes through emergency coronavirus law

Vaccinations should never be mandatory.  Will other countries try that on the populace?

Would New Zealand’s globalist, socialist parliament try it?  They’ve been ramming through unethical UN-mandated legislation ever since they got in to power.

What would it take to make a vaccine coupled with a Biometric ID mandatory and WHO would benefit?  Will the vaccine combine with ID2020, the universal digital Biometric identity?

Lets start with what we know:

  • Bill Gates wants population control and his interest is in vaccines.
  • The Gates foundation is one of the entities developing ID2020, the universal Biometric ID combined with a vaccine that the UN wants implemented by 2030.  The ID2020 partners, among other stakeholders, are Rockefeller, Gates, The UN, Accenture for the RFID chip and Gavi for vaccines.  ID2020 is described in an earlier blog post and it’s described below in the links.
  • The biometric data will be stored at Geneva.
  • WHO is at Geneva? The Word Health Organisation and GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization.  The Gates Foundation is a founding partner of Gavi.  GAVI is supported by WHO, and needless to say, its main partners and sponsors are the pharma-industry.
ID2020 banner

The ID2020 partners

Event 201 Six weeks before the outbreak in Wuhan, the Gates foundation ran a simulation of a Coronavirus pandemic on October 18th 2019.

CISMCoincidentally, the 2019 Military World Games (CISM) held its opening ceremony on the same day in Wuhan.

CISM games, Wuhan 2019

2019 Military World Games, Wuhan.

Now for where I think this is going: The global Identity will be introduced as a vaccine – and this pandemic may be used as a way to get people to accept, even demand it.  This Coronavirus is certainly scaring us.  If a sane, rational country like Denmark could do it, what’s to stop other nations – especially if the leaders grant themselves emergency powers to mandate it.  God help those who resist!  Unvaccinated people will not be welcome in public anywhere.

Call me a conspiracy theorist if you want.  I hope I am wrong!  Would you take a vaccine that combines a biometric ID?

This is what I found – and it’s really going to get under your skin.

While answering questions on the COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic on the 18th March 2020, globalist oligarch Bill Gates revealed something interesting during a Reddit ‘Ask Me Anything’ session when he gave a chilling reply to this question;What changes are we going to have to make to how businesses operate to maintain our economy while providing social distancing?”

“The question of which businesses should keep going is tricky. Certainly food supply and the health system. We still need water, electricity and the internet. Supply chains for critical things need to be maintained. Countries are still figuring out what to keep running,” Gates responded.

It was the next part of his answer that alarmed individuals concerned with protecting medical freedom and privacy rights.

“Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it,” Gates said.

Reddit users were immediately thunderstruck with Gates’ ominous response and were scrambling for a clarification from the former Microsoft CEO that never came.

“Digital certificates? Are you saying each person individually will receive a document that says we were tested? Can that be used against us?” a Reddit user posted.

“No, he’s saying Microsoft and MIT developed “tatoo (sic) markers” that show whether you have received (sic) a vaccine or not.  This will be coupled with Gate’s (sic) new invention, ID2020, which is a digital ID microchip implanted under the skin,” another Reddit user said to explain Gates’ motives.

Source: As Coronavirus Panic Spreads, Bill Gates Talks Up ‘Digital Certificates’ to Enforce Mandatory Vaccines

Quantum-dot tattoos

The ‘digital certificates’ Gates was referring to are human-implantable ‘QUANTUM-DOT TATTOOS’ that researchers at MIT and Rice University are working on as a way to hold vaccination records.  What are they?  Think nanos – a semiconductor nanostructure.

It was last year in December when scientists from the two universities revealed that they were working on these quantum-dot tattoos after Bill Gates approached them about solving the problem of identifying those who have not been vaccinated.

So Gates was working on the implantable tattoos in December 2019, the same month the virus first appeared in Wuhan, China.  He’s been working on this since all United Nations countries made a global commitment to provide legal identity for everyone by 2030.

In 2017 Microsoft joined ID2020 and positioned themselves to spearhead the ID2020 initiative.  Gates and the Board of the Alliance have a “Certification Mark” that they award to companies and technologies that meet the criteria of being “good” digital ID tech.

This month, on March 11th 2020 in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, ID2020 announced its first two certified digital identity solutions: Kiva Protocol and Gravity.Earth.

These are digital wallets using a blockchain technology platform that enables digital identity and verifiable credit history.

So far Kiva has been tested on the people of Sierra Leone and Syrian refugees.

Which means ID2020, a digital ID and wallet combined with a vaccine, is getting ready to go.  Will we all be required to take a mandatory vaccine in order to go back to work?

Or travel?

Will a new digital currency be ushered in after the economy crashes?  Will we all have to use a digital wallet with cryptocurrency we can “trust” in order to buy and sell?

Will this ultimately lead to the technology we’re warned of in Revelation 13 of the Bible?

Gates and mandatory vaccine

Further news from April 4th 2020: Bill Gates is funding new factories for 7 potential coronavirus vaccines, even though it will waste billions of dollars


Links

ID2020 is a UN plan for everyone to have a universal digital ID, in accordance with Agenda 2030 sustainable development goal 16.9.

In September 2019, the ID2020 Alliance launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine alliance Gavi, and new partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief.

The world’s biometric data will be held in Geneva where Gavi (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations) and the Word Health Organisation are based.

Event 201

Event 201 was a pandemic simulation of a Coronavirus pandemic held in New York six weeks before the Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.  The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly proposed these recommendations.

Clinical trials during outbreaks in collaboration with CEPI, GAVI, and the World Health Organisation was one of the recommendations.

The Show Must Go On. Event 201: The 2019 Fictional Pandemic Exercise [World Economic Forum, Gates Foundation et al.]

Wuhan military Olympics

On the same day as Event 201, the 2019 Military World Games (CISM) held its opening ceremony  in Wuhan.  The CISM  is the military Olympics which began in 1995 in Rome, on the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Charter of the United Nations at the end of World War 2.

 

 

 

 

Dr Vernon Coleman believes that once a vaccine is developed, it will be compulsory – so watch out for that.

The Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic: The Real Danger is “Agenda ID2020”

Legislation to Force Testing or Bar you From the Public
“After the pandemic has been officially declared, the next step may be – also at the recommendation either by WHO, or individual countries, “force vaccination”, under police and/or military surveillance. Those who refuse may be penalized (fines and / or jail – and force-vaccinated all the same).”

Reddit AMA session

Is This a Plot To Cover-up Collapse of Keynesian Economics?
“This is obviously an orchestrated shut down of the global economy, for no reason at all – or rather, they have a reason but it’s nothing to do with this silly virus.”

First Certification Mark for Digital ID Is Completed

Bill Gates will use microchip implants to fight coronavirus

BILL GATES: “You Can’t Travel Without a VACCINE CERTIFICATE” (COVID-19 HOAX)

Are they planning ID2020 as mandatory implants for all as the solution to the crisis?
“The United Nations’ WHO is part of this ID2020.  Scaring the world and making people feel unsafe unless they are certified not to have this Coronavirus just may be part of the plot behind the curtain. I hate conspiracy theories, but this is in the open. The health industry is destroying the world economy and making people feel unsafe. Unemployment is skyrocketing as people lose their jobs and will be then conditioned that if they have been certified, then and only then will they be safe to return to the workforce.”

Duckspeak and Agenda 2030

I will be blogging about the UN’s Agenda 2030, focusing mainly on it’s detrimental effects on New Zealand and Australia.  In case you don’t think it’s a thing, here’s Jacinda Adern speaking about fulfilling the goals of Agenda 2030.  Note, there is no mandate from the people of New Zealand for this.  When she says “we” or “New Zealand,” she’s speaking for herself.  

UN SDG review – Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

But this is a good example of “Duckspeak.”

“There is a word in Newspeak,’ said Syme, ‘I don’t know whether you know it: duckspeak, to quack like a duck.” – George Orwell, 1984

duck-quack

Adern’s minority government was elected to reduce immigration because of concern about New Zealand’s homeless problem.  We have the worst level of homelessness in the developed world.  Instead of doing anything about it – Adern increased the number of refugees and on Christmas 2019, our country was sneakily signed up to the UN’s Global Migration compact, without New Zealanders’ permission.

I am left asking why?

Adern broken promises

In case you think that “giving our country away” is a bit emotive, here’s the page showing the 1.1 million migrants for New Zealand.   Look and decide for yourself.  The source is the UN DESA (The UN ‘Department of Economic and Social Affairs.’)  Now we can see whose interests Jacinda is acting in – and it’s not New Zealand’s.


18 March 2020, further to this post: I’ve just read about a young gun owner in Waikanae who was harrassed by the police. He was asked questions about the New Conservative party: “Do you know what New Conservative’s immigration policy is?”
Do you know any representatives of the New Conservative party?”

Source: https://waikanaewatch.org/2020/03/16/police-continue-to-intimidate-licenced-firearms-owners/

Why was the NZ Police asking about this political party???

Here is New Conservative’s reply about their immigration policy:

New Conservative

 

 

Dear NZ Police Management,

New Zealand is a sovereign nation, and it’s also supposed to be a democratic one. So please find our immigration policy attached.

PS – You are supposed to enforce law, not a political agenda…

#LetsFixThis

Immigration policy

Immigration is central to many parts of New Zealand’s culture, economy, and future prospects. New Conservative believes that there is a balance to be struck between the important benefits that immigration brings and the wellbeing of those who already call New Zealand “home.”

We believe that those who choose to immigrate should embrace New Zealand’s culture and not try and change it.​

New Conservative will ensure there is no acceptance or allowance of Sharia Law, in any expression, as well as any non-constitutional jurisdictional authority, in New Zealand.

The key New Conservative immigration policy is “Net Zero Immigration”. This would be for a period determined by the time taken to ease housing demand, which could be as little as 12 months (student visas and returning New Zealanders excluded).

Long term immigration policy must be based on which occupations will be available/necessary in the future.​

Prioritising immigrants who can add to our economy and not depend on it.​

Working with NZ based non-governmental organisations operating in troubled zones to identify genuine refugees who are more closely aligned with our nation’s values, and fill our refugee quota with these people, rather than accepting the United Nations allotment.

NZ New Conservative

A Digital Identity will be needed by 2030

According to Sustainable Development Goal SDG 16 of the U.N. Agenda 2030 we’re going to need a digital identity.   This high-minded goal doesn’t tell us that, it simply describes itself as:

SDG 16.9“The promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, the provision of access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable institutions at all levels.”

The devil is in the details.  Drilling down a level to target 16.9, the goal is “By 2030 to provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”

The World Bank states that birth registration alone is not enough. Health treatments need to be tracked, including vaccinations.  It will be needed for banks and households where there’s “more than one family.”
Source: The criterion problem: Measuring the legal identity target in the post-2015 agenda

The World Bank argues that SDG16.9 is “key to attainment of many other SDG goals.”

Note: “What’s the end goal?”  film producer the late Aaron Russo asked his friend Nicholas Rockefeller.  Rockefeller replied, “The end goal is to get everybody chipped.”

You’ll find Russo’s warning at 10:40 on the clip “Rockefeller Reveals 9 11 FRAUD and New World Order to Aaron Russo.

ID2020

So the U.N., Microsoft, the Rockefeller Foundation and a host of other stakeholders came up with ID2020, a program aimed at giving every human on the planet a digital ID, like a fingerprint, in order to keep everyone connected.

ID2020 banner

When I first mentioned ID2020 in my post ID2020, the Global Digital ID I didn’t know it was part of U.N. Agenda 2030.

I should have realised from the weird conference room the stakeholders were meeting in.  I later learned it was a United Nations Council chamber.

On May 18th, 2018 the World Bank Group and the United Nations signed a Strategic Partnership Framework (SPF), which consolidates their joint commitment to cooperate in helping countries implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Microsoft have positioned themselves to spearhead the ID2020 initiative.  The initiative helmed by Bill Gates is aimed at “getting Digital IDs right.”

“As companies are only now defining what a proper, official online ID looks like, ID2020 seeks to help define what a “good” digital ID is. Gates and the Board of the Alliance have a “Certification Mark” that they award to companies and technologies that meet the criteria of being “good” digital ID tech.

Gates

WHAT’S THE CONNECTION TO VACCINATIONS?

The idea behind some of ID2020’s more controversial technologies is a digital ID that can be implanted into someone in chip form. Ostensibly, this is to help homeless people or people in developing countries by giving them access to blockchain-powered identification.

In theory, the practice would have people receiving free vaccinations through the Bill Gates foundation if they have an ID chip implant. In turn, these implants would carry encrypted, blockchain-backed data that allow for easy access to services you can’t normally get without an ID.

It could also help social workers and researchers keep up with who is up-to-date on their vaccinations.”

Source: Medium – IMPLANTABLE DIGITAL ID VACCINATION SYSTEM IN DEVELOPMENT, YIKES?

Would you agree to have a microchip implanted into your body? That’s the question that Microsoft and a group of pharmaceutical companies are asking.

Implantable device

The Microsoft Certification Mark

Governments, NGO’s and charities have been beavering away on technology projects in order to get their Microsoft Certification Mark.

I was wondering why the Red Cross had disbursed only a third of the donated funds to the victims of the Australian bushfires.  Those expensive Agenda 2030 goals and technology projects will no doubt be costing a lot of money and the public would never donate for a thing like this.  I’ll put the links to the Red Cross at the bottom of the page.

The reason I’m picking on them is because the Red Cross has been in the news about the Australian Bush fire donations and I notice they’ve adopted the green-tape of Agenda 2030 in their practices.

The 169 Sustainable Development Targets

The devil really is in these targets, which you can find here and drill down on by clicking on each of the 17 goals.  Why 169, I wondered?

169 = 13 x 13.

Revelation 13 describes the mark of the beast and the deceiver who forces it on the world.  Will we be the generation to contend with the mark we’ve been warned about in the Bible?

Here’s another unwelcome thought: will the mark alter our DNA?  We’re on the cusp of another technological revolution so I believe it’s possible.  I’m mentioning it so we can be aware of it.

Altering Human Genetics Through Vaccination

“The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.”

Source: Jon Rappoport


Finally, I believe this will lead to a totalitarian state.  If we refuse the ID, we won’t get access to any services.

The Sustainable Development Goals, Identity, and Privacy: Does their implementation risk human rights?

While birth registration is the only form of identification specifically mentioned in SDG 16.9, in the initiatives that have emerged from the goal seem to have barely considered it. Rather, they are concerned about other technologies: the likes of national ID cards, biometrics, and more exotic and untested technologies like blockchain.

“Identity” is an important part of all our lives and having the ability to prove who we are is empowering. Having control over our identity can help not only achieve the necessities of life, but also more fundamental concerns of dignity and autonomy. Implementing SDG 16.9 could be done in a way that does not risk this. Yet, if the push is towards greater implementation of some centralised, unique, insecure, one-size-fits-all identity systems which fail to consider the individual, their needs and rights, it can prove to be the opposite.

ID systems can lead to surveillance, tracking and profiling by states and private companies; they can exclude rather than include; they can limit opportunities and become a tool for control and repression. Without proper consideration, SDG 16.9 could lead to a move against not only the broader Goal 16 for peaceful and sustainable societies, but also be damaging for human rights, and ultimately harm the very people it was intended to help.
Source: Privacy International


The Red Cross

Red Cross Accused of Withholding Millions of Dollars in Donations Meant for Australian Bushfires

COMMENT: Red Cross Using Social Media Spin Doctors To Screw Bushfire Victims

Red Cross director admits that almost $11million from bushfire donations WON’T go to victims and will be used for ‘administration costs’

The Australian Red Cross  – Submission to the Human Rights and Technology project

Red Cross NZ: Red Cross welcomes UN global goals for sustainable development

The Green Tape – Goal 15 of UN Agenda 2030

As the Sunday afternoon sky in New Zealand went an unprecedented orange from Australia’s bush fires, eventually draining into an early sepia toned twilight, I was left dumbfounded. Australia has experienced bush fires before and should know how to deal with them.  Why on God’s green earth did the Australian state and federal governments close fire trails, remove dams and ignore calls to thin out trees and remove undergrowth?

There are news reports like this one from The Sydney Morning Herald, Green ideas must take blame for deaths :Fire trails have been blocked up to turn the land back to its natural state and volunteer firefighters prevented by National Parks and Wildlife Service employees from bulldozing control lines because of damage to vegetation.

“… Instances like that are just too numerous to mention. Governments … have been in too much of a rush to appease green idealism … This thing about locking up forests is just not working.”

“I believe there is an agenda..” an Australian wrote in the comments section of an article from the Volunteer Fire Fighters Association where a firefighter is shown wrapped in green tape.

Fireys-constrained-in-executing-their-duties-by-Greenies-and-green-policies-Terry-Pontikos-1024x576

Artwork on an article by the Volunteer Fire Fighters Association – done by Terry Pontikos.

UN SDG 15
UN Agenda 2030, goal 15

Yes there is an agenda – the green tape of the Sustainable Development Goals for Agenda 2030 – specifically SDG Goal #15.

In the name of this ideological goal, the UN has demanded that the undergrowth be left in the forests to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

What is this sustainable development goal that is causing such poor management of national parks and state forests?

The sustainable goals of Agenda 2030

In 2015, Agenda 21morphed into UN Agenda 2030 which the UN is now openly promoting.  It has 17 high-minded, altruistic and idealistic goals it’s happy to tell the world about, like “ending poverty.”

These goals come with 169 Sustainable Development Goals you are not being told about.  You won’t find them very easily, I had to do some digging, but here’s the link.

Click on goal 15.  One of the 169 goals is SDG 15.2.1, “Sustainable Forest Management” which involves “biomass.”

Generally speaking, biomass includes the stem, stump, branches, bark, seeds and foliage.  It’s more important to the UN Climate Change lobby to keep biomass (the undergrowth) in the name of “reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”  That’s why firefighters and local authorities have been prevented from managing their own forests.

The United Nations doesn’t care that the undergrowth is highly combustible leading to unstoppable fires.  According to them biomass is good as it absorbs carbon dioxide!

Note: carbon dioxide, or CO2 is a trace gas which makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere.  Yet it is being portrayed by the UN as a harmful greenhouse gas.

This is how the world’s forests are being “conserved” in the name of sustainable development and climate change.

It’s not ‘climate change’ threatening Australia – it’s the belief in climate change.


Biomass and “sustainable” forest management

Here’s the link on the FAO Food and Agriculture page under ‘Key results’ of target 15.1. Quote: “Furthermore, stopping deforestation contributes to reducing of impacts of climate change as forests absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it as biomass.”  

And here’s Australia’s report card from the UN for SDG 15.2.1: “Sustainable Forest Management.”  It seems the Australian government is after a big UN tick for their biomass targets.  Read it and weep.

If you are wondering who the FAO are, the Food and Agriculture Organisation is headquartered in Rome.   It seems sovereign management of the nations’ land is being quietly transferred to the United Nations, under something called “FAO Custodianship.”  This link is for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Clearly the land confiscation and United Nations ideological approach to forest management is a disaster in the making, and not just one confined to Australia given the rise of uncontrollable fires.  This is criminal.

This is what top-down rule by bureaucrats from an UNelected and UNaccountable world government looks like.

I hope I’ve shown you enough to see where this unelected, rampaging, land grabbing, lying, murdering socialist beast is taking us.  Where’s it going?  How much suffering has it already caused?

My recommendation is to read up on the 169 UN Sustainable Development Goals and see which ones are being enacted in your country.


A farmer’s plea to the Australian government:

Craig Calvert“A dairy farmer who spent 13 hours defending his property from a fire that spat out 100m large fireballs has pleaded with the PM to not let any more people die.”

Source: The Daily Telegraph: NSW bushfires: Devil’s inferno, eerie photo of massive blaze

“Shaking and fighting back tears Mr Calvert said that government incompetence had led to the disaster fire season.

“People need help. Australia is scared. To Mr (Morrison), please throw your gloves on, come on down here and see me,” he said.

“Morris (Morrison) step up and get behind us, don’t let anymore people die in the future. You’re the man of the hour, everyone will fall behind you.”

“I’ve got an extensive network who can help with knowledge of the bush and how the environment actually runs. It doesn’t run on paperwork.”

Do you think he’ll be listened to?


The Excuses

And now, here come the “Climate Change” excuses – the fire season is longer, because of “global warming” – so they weren’t able to do backburns.

While many people use the terms interchangeably, hazard reduction is done ahead of bushfire season to reduce the intensity of fires if they do happen, while backburning is done as a last resort to stop a fire that’s already burning.

Mechanical clearing like slashing undergrowth, or even reducing the ground fuel by hand wasn’t done because the local fire authorities are having difficulties getting into national parks to do hazard reduction.

As for backburns, former leader Barnaby Joyce pointed out it’s not like there’s no period to get them done – they could do it in the middle of winter or periods after rain. When they do have occasions to do it, they are constrained by bureaucracy – green tape. Conservation decisions are made by bureaucrats who don’t live in the area.

Former CSIRO scientist David Packham said the same thing in an interview with Sky News Australia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6RrgBrb6R8

“The bushfires are now catastrophic.”  Les Crowe, National Chief Loss Adjuster to the Insurance Council of Australia wrote about a misconception propagated by the media : “This the first time such fires have been rated as catastrophic. True, but not because they were rated any worse than many previous fires. In 2009, following the bush-fire inquiry, the defined categories of fire were renamed. Catastrophic was introduced as the most severe warning. So this description was never intended to make people think they were the worst fires ever. I have heard many media reports entrench this mistake.”

You’ll find his remarks in the comments section of this link: ‘Climate change doesn’t cause fires’ : “You can’t blame climate change when you’ve restricted access to millions of hectares of densely thickened eucalypt forests and wonder why they go up in smoke.

You can’t blame climate change when you haven’t back burned this millennium.

You can’t blame climate change when there are no fire breaks or cool buffer zones installed around towns, houses and critical infrastructure.”


Finally, what’s this about the Rural Fire Brigades struggling for money?

That's full fucked

Links

Index by SDGs 169 targets – click on each goal to see the devil in the details.

FAO Sustainable Development Goals

United Nations Information Centre, Canberra: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

UN Global Compact Network, Australia: Advancing the SDG’s.

Protests caused by failed energy policies at Santiago, this year’s UN venue

The United Nations Climate Change Conferences are conferences held each year in various locations, where thousands of officials, NGOs and politicians jet in with their fossil-fuel guzzling planes.  I note from the “Conference of the Parties” website they present a “Fossil of the Day” award to shame any country burning coal or not meeting it’s UN targets – but they can’t see the irony.

But this time I’m not talking about hypocrisy, I’m going to talk about the effects of UN Goal 13 – Climate Action.

This year, right now – from the 2nd to 13th December 2019, the UN conference was going to take place in Santiago, Chile.  The reason it’s not is massive protests and rioting caused by failed energy policies.

How a $0.04 metro fare price hike sparked massive unrest in Chile. Source: Vox

How a $0.04 metro fare price hike sparked massive unrest in Chile. Source: Vox

Demonstrations against a hike in metro ticket prices in Chile’s capital exploded into violence on October 18, unleashing widening protests over living costs and social inequality.

Here’s the reason for the price hike in living and metro costs: in 2018 the Chilean government, in a step towards achieving the country’s climate action targets, opted for expensive wind and solar to power most of Santiago Metro’s energy sources.

As a result, Chileans are now burdened by higher Metro fares reflecting unnecessary energy price hikes.

Chile does not lack natural resources – they could have used water and coal, but this is a no-no as far the UN is concerned.  The country cancelled two power projects because of aggressive opposition, one a coal-fired plant and the other a hydro-electric scheme.  These cancelled projects cost Chile billions.

Former Chilean president Michelle Bachelet (from 2006 to 2010 and 2014 to 2018) called it “a pioneering project of the entire world.”  Chilean engineer Douglas Pollock said, “She was probably right because I don’t know of any other country which has done such nonsense.  Electricity cost for the subway rose 210%.”

The government also hit the portion of conventional power that remained with new carbon dioxide taxes.  Just like France.

Vox reported that 50 percent of Chilean workers earn less than 400,000 pesos per month (roughly $550), making a small change to public transportation costs a plausible breaking point.

Results: riots.  This is the effect of climate alarmism, carbon ideology and governments that are UN-concerned with their people.  The green policies introduced there have proved so disastrous and unpopular that Chile is in flames.

It seems Chile’s been getting the wrong things into power.  Is it time to get out of the UN and find leaders that don’t serve the UN or its partner the World Bank?

Santiago

An aerial view of a burnt metro station in Santiago. Source: NDTV Metro Stations Burned, Buses Set On Fire In Chile’s Worst Riots In Years.


Links

United Nations Climate Change conference

Chile’s largest metro network to be powered by solar and wind

Expensive Climate Policies Sparked The Chilean Riots, Just Like In France

Green Policies Are Turning Chile Into Venezuela

“Chilean engineer Douglas Pollock (he has an ancestor buried in Westminster Abbey but despite the name, he is very much a Chilean) spoke with tears in his eyes as he outlined the terrible damage that environmentalism has done to his country in such a short space of time.

“You can hear Douglas talk about the tragedy that has befallen his country in the interview above.  You can also find his speech, in which he talks in more detail about the damage done by green policy to Chile’s economy here.

Nice one, greenies. You have no claim to the moral high ground. What you are doing to the planet is pure evil.”


UN goal 5 is ‘Gender equality’ and goal 8 is ‘Decent work and economic growth: ‘Buy from green companies that are equal opportunity employers.’ 

How did that work out for Chile?

After leaving the presidency in 2010 and while not immediately reelectable, Michelle Bachelet was appointed the first executive director of the newly created United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

It seems the current president, oligarch Sebastián Piñera is no better,  he was unconcernedly eating at a pizza restaurant during the Santiago riot.  His lapses, errors and inconveniences have been labelled “piñericosas” in Chile.
“Chile burns and he eats pizza”: storm against president Pinera

The UN-sustainable Prince

charles-nz-1

The Prince of Wales addressed the issue of environment during his royal visit to NZ

Prince Charles has been out here in New Zealand again, I don’t know why.  He was only here three years ago.  Here he is in November 2019, lecturing on the effects of a ‘human spending spree’ of earth’s resources.  I wish a reporter would step up and ask ‘who’s doing the spending?’

Charles offered the usual pessimism, doom and gloom, “a tipping point,” wanting us to “take less, make less and dispose of less,” warning us we only have ten years to do it.  In 2011 we were warned it was six years.  It gets old after a while.

Prince Charles issues stark climate change warning

Is Charles going to do with less?  I don’t think he was talking about himself or his family.

Prince Charles to visit New Zealand: Here’s his remarkable travel demands revealed

Prince Charles – Hypocrite

How often do you hear about “climate change” or “global warming” on the news?  Can you remember when you first started hearing about it?

Fifty years ago it wasn’t a thing. In the 1970’s we were being warned about “an ice age,” we were told to only have two children and it was predicted we’d run out of food. So I’ve heard it all before.  It’s a political agenda designed to scare the public into a new world order.

Of course we’ve got to look after the environment.  But this isn’t about the environment.

Joan Veon, a committed Christian, international journalist, and businesswoman attended more than 100 United Nations and UN-related meetings all over the world and reported on the links between the Technocrats and the UN.

Joan Veon tells how she received her “wake up call” when she learned that the super-rich elite of the world have been feverishly working to establish a “One World Government” through a multitude of “international” institutions.

How often do you hear the term “sustainable development?”  When the term was formulated in 1990 Prince Charles commended those who came up with it for getting the term into everyone’s vocabulary.

Joan Veon wrote an article called ‘Sustainable development, Agenda 21 and Prince Charles’, showing how Prince Charles kicked the ball off.

She also wrote a book about his activities.

In April 1991, fourteen months before Agenda 21 was initiated at Rio, Prince Charles held a private two-day conference aboard the royal yacht Britannia, moored off the coast of Brazil. His goal was to bring together key international figures in an attempt to unite them at the Rio Earth Summit.

On board his yacht were senior officials from the World Bank, chief executives from the big oil companies such as Shell and British Petroleum, key NGOs and other officials. Some of them were energy traders. Al Gore was also present.

They invented the term ‘global warming’ in 1992 and the term was used at the initiation of Agenda 21 in Rio.

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban hosuing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Earth Summit director at the inititation of Agenda 21 in Rio, 1992.


Energy Trading

Do you know what ‘Emissions Trading’ or cap-and-trade is?  It’s Energy trading – an exchange where polluters can buy permits for their pollution.  Polluters must hold permits in an amount equal to their emissions.  Those who want to increase their emissions must buy permits from others willing to sell them.

Then the merchants graduated to making money out of the air by labelling C02 a pollutant, even though it’s a harmless gas that makes up just 0.058% of the atmosphere.

So it’s money for nothing – like the Pope selling indulgences as licenses to sin.  Before graduating to C02 the traders started by buying pollution permits for coal-fired power stations.  With this kind of thing, there’s enormous potential for moral risk from greed.   Do you know about the scandal of an energy trading company called Enron?

enron4

Palace defends prince’s Enron link

“The close links between Charles and Enron came amid dramatic new evidence of the way the company bought its way into the highest echelons of the British Establishment.”  Prince Charles took £1m off Enron


Sustainability?

In 2007 Prince Charles set up The Prince’s Rainforests Project (PRP) in the UK.  The project is working with governments, businesses and non-profit organisations around the world to quickly find solutions to deforestation, with the ambition of “making the trees worth more alive than dead.”

That’s good.  Actually, it’s great. 

Britain Rainforest Prince

So why on God’s green earth did the Duchy of Cornwall, the Prince’s private estate, invest $113,500 in Sustainable Forestry Management Ltd, a “carbon credits” company based in Bermuda?  Sustainable Forestry wanted to trade in carbon credits from rainforests.  That means paying money to harvest rainforest trees. 

They weren’t allowed to, so they started to lobby politicians.  Prince Charles also made speeches criticising existing regulations and calling for a change in the rules to allow trading in rainforest carbon credits.  Why would he set himself up to be the conservator of rainforests and then try to have that protection removed?  What does that tell us?

Paradise Papers: Prince Charles’s offshore investments revealed – BBC News

Prince Charles ‘lobbied for climate policy change without disclosing offshore financial interest’


Links

Minutes, Sustainable Forestry 2005,  with mention of the ‘Green Planet Tax shelter.’

More about his lifestyle, and his opinions:

What Prince Charles Doesn’t Want You to Know about His Lavish Lifestyle

“Charles has an overweening sense of privilege and entitlement, born of many years of being pampered with a level of personal service and comfort that have securely insulated him from the realities of normal life. He also has annoying habit, as The Economist recently noted, of “sounding off about a wide range of subjects about which he has more opinions than knowledge.”

… And his hypocrisy

Prince Charles flew 125miles in a helicopter to give speech on aircraft emissions

ID2020, the Global Digital ID

Thirty years ago our government tried to foist an ID card on New Zealand citizens. The IMF and NZ politician Jenny Shipley were behind that attempt, but TV3 News did it’s job, and warned the public. The ID card was scrapped after public outrage – just as it had been in Australia.

So what’s happening nowadays? Besides the fact that the news media no longer serves the public?

Did you know there’s a global digital ID being planned for everyone?

Our Manifesto | ID2020

So who is this group, the ID2020 Alliance?

“ID2020, a US-registered non-profit based in New York, NY, is the Secretariat for the ID2020 Alliance, a public-private partnership that is ‘maximizing the potential of digital ID to improve lives.'”

Alliance-and-Governance-Leaderboard-Image

A high level meeting of ID2020 employees. Notice the interesting object hanging on the far wall of the United Nations Council chamber.

ID2020 is a diverse lot of stakeholders. Bill Gates is a founding member. UN agencies, NGOs, governments, and enterprises are all very invested in developing this. It’s being foisted on vulnerable people like the refugees and homeless first.

The stakeholders are a mix of UN agencies, Blockchain companies, financial services to the developing world, vaccine makers, biometrics companies, refugee agencies, and lawyers.

Some of the stakeholders give me pause – like the UN’s ICC (International Computing Centre), Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Bearing in mind the Rockefeller Foundation are involved in this, I have included a link from an interview with Aaron Russo which I believe is relevant now.

Aaron Russo was friends with Nick Rockefeller who wanted to recruit him for the Council on Foreign Relations during the tenure of their friendship. There’s a warning in this 10 minute clip from Russo about the end goal, “to get us all chipped.”

Rockefeller Reveals 9 11 FRAUD and New World Order to Aaron Russo


The Bible warns in Revelation 13:16-17 of a future where everyone will be forced to take a mark in order to buy and sell.

We’re not there yet, but I believe this is a precursor to that mark.


Blockchain

ID2020 will be sold to the rest of us as a secure online ID because it uses blockchain, a technology that can’t be tampered because it’s stored in different locations. The blockchain can’t be tampered with, right?

Why Accenture’s Plan to ‘Edit’ the Blockchain Is a Big Deal.

ID2020 Stakeholders

We’re told this is a mix of private-public-partnerships. These are used by governments for building infrastructure. Joan Veon, a journalist who attended over 100 UN meetings concerning world government wrote about PPPs. She said, before passing away in 2010 “I have seen world government in action and it is here, now.”

Here are some of the entities involved.

Accenture: think artificial intelligence, blockchain, robotics, drones with computer vision and virtual reality.

Microsoft and Accenture Unveil Global ID System for Refugees

GAVI is the Vaccine Alliance, focusing their vaccines right now on the third world.

IDEO.og – customer service for refugees.

ICC – Information Technology and Communications (ICT) services within the United Nations System. 

iRespond – Digital identity for everyone on the planet.

KIVA – Financial Services

Simprints Simprints is a nonprofit biometrics company that is building an affordable, secure, rugged, open-source fingerprint system that works in the world’s toughest settings. They are working with Gavi.

Links

ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with vaccines

ID2020 Alliance

ID2020 Alliance’ Will Combine Vaccinations & Implantable ID Microchips

Microsoft and Jio: Accelerating India’s digital progress

Microsoft and Accenture Unveil Global ID System for Refugees

Accenture, ID2020: Digital Identity

Nick Rockefeller:

His securities practice includes litigation before the United States Supreme Court and a number of his transactions have been featured in leading periodicals. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Insitutute of Strategic Studies, the Advisory Board of RAND, the Pacific Council on International Policy, the Committee on Foreign Relations in Los Angeles, the Western Justice Center, and has served as a participant in the World Economic Forum and the Aspen Institute. He is a member of the Board of Visitors of the Law Schools of the University of Oregon and Pepperdine University and is active in the affairs of his alma mater, Yale University. He recently chaired a panel at the United Nations on E-Commerce and is a co-author of “Economic Strategy and National Security”.

Nicholas’ China practice includes transactions with China’s largest banks, energy companies, communications entities and real estate enterprises as well as with China’s principal cities and leading provinces. He was chosen as a board member of the Central China Construction and Development Commission and as a director of the Xiwai International School of Shanghai International University. He has appeared numerous times on CCTV and other China media.

Nicholas is a graduate of Yale University and of Yale Law School.

2017 ID2020 Summit: Highlights and Key Takeaways:  They  are taking the Gavi model as a blueprint for the ID2020 Alliance.  List of stakeholders are here.

ID2020 Network:

ID2020 – Government-Issued IDs – Global Governance.

id-2020-alliance-network

Who is in charge of London?

Fabian_Society_coat_of_arms.svg

The Fabian Society

Sadiq Khan is the Muslim Mayor of London.  He’s also a Fabian socialist.  When you’ve got a Muslim guarding a major European city like London, you’ve got a wolf guarding the sheep.

During his election campaign last year, Khan described himself to the New Statesman this way: “I’m a Londoner, I’m British, I’m English, I’m of Asian origin, of Pakistani heritage, I’m a dad, I’m a husband, I’m a long-suffering Liverpool fan, I’m Labour, I’m Fabian, and I’m Muslim.”

Wolf as sheep

I suspect the goals of the Fabians and Islamists are close enough for them to work hand in hand.  Both are totalitarian.  The Fabians goal is to subvert the existing order to establish a Socialist World Government, and Islam wants a worldwide caliphate and Sharia law.

Since he got into power last year, the first thing he did was create a London online hate crime hub, which launched in April 2017.

Of course he did.  Will Londoners feel safe to say or express how they feel after the Muslim attacks?

The Metropolitan Police have made 25 arrests for hate crime offences since Saturday,” said the Metropolitan Police.  Source: Metropolitan Police statement on hate crime in London

It didn’t take them long.

Kahn1

They’re tracking British people for hate crimes, but not tracking the 200 Jihadists they’ve “let back in.”

But Sadiq Khan told Piers Morgan in an interview that London’s police “did not have enough police resources to monitor the jihadists returning to the United Kingdom from Syria and Iraq.”

Watching that interview we can see where Kahn’s priorities lie.  It’s in protecting that fifth column in British society.  Is he keeping the Londoners calm, telling them to “get used to terrorism,” while he prepares London for the caliphate?


Kahn

London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick visit the scene of the attack on London Bridge and the Borough Market. (Clodagh Kilcoyne/Reuters)

The London Metropolitan Police

London Bridge is falling down, and there’s no fair lady.

Police Commissioner Cressida Dick, seen above with Sadiq Khan is the London Metropolitan Police Commissioner.  She said “diversity was at the heart of her role as she confirmed she was in a same-sex relationship with a colleague.”

Speaking after becoming the first woman to lead British policing, Miss Dick pledged to drag it into the ‘brave new world’ of 21st-century technology.  She warned that more officers will carry Tasers, that the front-line is likely to shrink further, and controversial stop-and-search tactics may increase.  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4423238/New-Met-chief-Dick-says-diversity-heart-role.html#ixzz4jPQHpqzH

Londoners need a Police Commissioner appointed on ability, not diversity.  Especially for that role.

I predict that Muslim attacks will increase, as will the wrongful arrests for hate speech of British people who speak out against them.  The relationship of people and the police will suffer.  The frog will continue to boil, until the British people wake up to what’s happening.  I hope it’s soon.


“Hate crimes”

After I wrote this post, I found out that people in Germany are being arrested for “hate crimes” in speaking out against Islam.

Man Jailed for Anti-Islam Facebook Posts, Germany Raids Homes of 36 People Accused of Hateful Social Media Posts

1984 is seemingly already in full-effect in the EU.

And it’s not just in the EU.  It’s also come to the US, in Minneapolis.
Minneapolis sets up hotline for Muslims to report “Islamophobia”


Links

Fabian Society: http://www.freebritainnow.org/0/fabiansociety.htm
https://fabiansociety.wordpress.com/

KASSAM: London Cops Arrest Dozens for ‘Hate Crimes’ Since London Attack, But Mayor Says Police Can’t Afford to Track Jihadists

https://counterjihadreport.com/2017/06/07/kassam-london-cops-arrest-dozens-for-hate crimes-since-london-attack-but-mayor-says-police-cant-afford-to-track-jihadists/

Britain’s real hate crime scandal

Sadiq Khan launches London online hate crime hub

Sadiq Khan And Obama Moving To Create New Internet Sharia Law


What Egypt thought of Obama

Here’s a bit of (black) humour. It’s Obama prattling on about “climate change being their biggest national security threat.”  Seriously?  The weather?  It’s just as well he’s going.  I hope the US can bounce back from him.

Here’s what the media in Egypt thought.  It’s refreshing after the sanitised, air-brushed version of president Obama that we’re presented with in the news.

Here are some of the comments:

“Is he insane?”

“He’s on drugs?”

“What do you expect from an affirmative action president?  He never served in the military, nor worked a day in his life.”

“Did you see that video of him working out?  My daughter has bigger biceps than him!”

“America is getting weaker by the day under this president.”

“Look what he did in Libya.  It’s all part of his plan.

“Your enemies no longer fear you. And your allies no longer trust you!”