Media

A right major crisis

Has the so-called Covid-19 (Wuhan Flu) pandemic been exploited so the globalists can gain control?  Is this major crisis being used to bring our nations down?

all-we-need-is-the-right-major-crisis-and-the-nations-will-accept-the-new-world-order-david-rockefeller

The globalists are often referred to as ‘they.’  Who are the ‘they?’  I’m talking of men like Nick Rockefeller, who told Aaron Russo their plans to get us all chipped, David Rockefeller (founder of the Trilateral Commission) and Bill Gates who wants us all to have “the vaccine.”

I wonder if at some time in the future, Gates’ vaccine will tie in somehow with our “carbon footprint?”  Bill Gates has a crisp formula for C02, which we all exhale and will be paying for.  This is what he came up with, which just goes to show that money does not equal intelligence.  To him, people are just numbers.

Bill Gates Technocracy measurement

Bill Gate’s formula

The technocrats want to destroy our economic system and replace it with “energy credits.”  Do you see the link between that and our “carbon footprint?”  Essentially, it’s a license to live.

What drives these men and their evil ideas?  It can’t be greed, they’ve already got all the money.  They’ve propagated the idea that “there’s too many people on the planet” and they have a desire for population control.  These men are eugenists who want to limit the number of people so that we’re in “perpetual balance with nature.”  You might recognise the phrase “perpetual balance” from the creepy Georgia Guidestones.  It’s also in the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

technocracy unamericanThey’ve pinned their faith on technocracy, an idea for a scientific utopia that got soundly quashed in the 1930’s as un-American.  It came back to life in the Carter Administration under Zbigniew Brzezinski, when in 1973, together with David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission embarked on a New International Economic Order based on Technocracy.  Brzezinski called this the “Technetronic Era” in his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages.”

These men play a long game, like Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War.”  They’ve been plotting for nearly a century.  Like a frog boiled in a pot, we don’t notice, because it spans generations. But their ritual demands they tell us.  How would they do that in a way that we won’t be alerted?

A scenario is created where the truth is told, but it can be ridiculed and mocked.  The messenger is wild eyed.  They imply he’s a “conspiracy theorist.”  There, we’ve been told.  From that point on, they expect us to automatically denounce and discount it.

In this clip, the man is warning about the Trilateral Commission.  Since he’s talking about them, we should ignore the canned laughter and find out more.

The truth in plain sight, 1981 (Aired on TV)

Trilateral logoThe Trilateral Commission

The idea for population control came from the Trilateral Commission, an organisation created at the behest of David Rockefeller in 1973.  David Rockefeller, longtime chairman of the Rockefeller family-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank and head of his family’s global corporate empire, was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as an off-shoot of the Council on Foreign Relations. The North American group is based in Washington.

I recommend the book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation by Patrick Wood.  If you’re not into reading, here’s his video clip: The Trilateral Commission and Technocracy.

Wood-Technocracy-Rising-624x468

In light of current events with the Covid-19 crisis, I found this quote interesting: “One of the biggest problems facing technocrats today is that there are just too many people …  One need only look at the Georgia Guidestones to find the technocrat’s optimum population. Of course we still have mandatory vaccinations, fluoridated water, abortion (on demand if they have their way), chemtrails, etc.. Nothing in the technocrat’s world happens by coincidence- everything is part of an overall plan. This includes crashing the economy.”  Source: The Technocracy- The Trilateral Commission- The Council on Foreign Affairs & the Deep State

David Rockefeller

Rockefeller was aided by a complicit media for 40 years.

In a National Press Club speech, he said: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” From his biography Memoirs, published in 2002

David Rockefeller’s leaked speech 1991

The media never reported on their activities.  Writers who stepped into the breach to report on them were labelled “conspiracy theorists.”  Have their warnings come true?

illuminati

Earlier warnings

Make Mine Freedom a 1948 Cartoon on “isms” and American Freedom


Related posts:

The anatomy of the beast
Crashing from a great height

Overheard on the hot mic, “the uh, covid-19 case fatality rate is like 0.3”

Do you wear a mask because of this so-called Covid-19 pandemic?

Off the record, you don’t need to!

Here’s a conversation that was recorded on a hot mic at the White House Press Conference on April 20th between Chief White House Correspondent for Fox News, John Roberts and a colleague;

 “You can take off your mask here, the uh case fatality rate is like 0.1 to 0.3”

“That’s reassuring.”

“Everybody here has been vaccinated anyway.”

“USC and LA County Public Health came out with a study, they found that there were 7,000 cases in California.  But they really believe there were anywhere from 221,000 to 442,000 people who were infected.”

“Really?”

“Yeah.”

“So that makes it 0.1 to 0.3 There’s a study they came out with, or?”

“Yeah, it just came out today.”

“So it suggests the case fatality rate is what? A tenth of what it seems to be.”

“Puts it right in line with the flu.”  

“Yeah, exactly.  That’s what it is.”  

“So it was a hoax …”

“I don’t think it was a hoax.”

“Ha Ha Ha.”   

THE REAL HOAX: REPORTER CAUGHT ON TAPE

John Roberts

John Roberts, Chief White House Correspondent

Did you hear that on the mainstream news?  Now why didn’t Fox News report that, if that’s what their Chief White House Correspondent maintained?


The figures John Roberts cited were born out by a pair of California doctors who argued for lifting the Covid-19 restrictions.

In the clip, Erickson (one of the doctors) asserts that there is only a “0.3 chance of dying from COVID in the state of California,” prompting him to ask, “Does that necessitate sheltering in place? Does that necessitate shutting down medical systems? Does that necessitate people being out of work?”

Unfortunately they’ve been scrubbed off the internet by the technology giants …

Their viral video was removed for violating YouTube’s Terms of Service, after racking up 5 million views.

You can watch it here.  The deleted news report was by 23ABC News in Bakersfield, California.

YouTube Deletes Video Of California Doctors Who Argued For Lifting COVID-19 Restrictions


* I think it’s time to use alternative media such as Bitchute instead of YouTube, as much as possible.  Also, try a different search engine instead of Google. I use DuckDuckGo.  Other search engines are Brave, Dogpile or StartPage.  StartPage also offers a proxy for those who want to not just search, but browse, the web in full privacy.


Covid-19 stats for California: population of 39.512 million as of July 1, 2019.  Number of Covid-19 cases as at May 7th 2020: 62,512.  Deaths: 2585.  You do the math.

See my post about the ‘Empty hospitals and the CDC secret ‘recipe’


Links

“So It Was A Hoax?” – Fox News’ John Roberts Caught On Hot Mic Discussing COVID-19 Mortality Rate With Technician

YouTube Takes Down Viral Doctor Video Debunking Quarantine Lock-Downs

Here’s another hot mic, from 2014.  Can you really trust the reporters? “We’re Screwed”: MSM Caught on Hot Mic at White House Ebola Press Briefing

Your Mask Is Making You Meaner, Dumber, More Afraid & Less Safe

Was the NZ abortion law changed to meet a UN sustainable goal?

While the rest of the world’s governments are dealing with Covid-19, the NZ government pushed through the Abortion Amendment Act.  It’s an extreme abortion bill that there’s no public mandate for – you’ll see why in a minute.

It didn’t need to be changed – as the law stands, women can get abortions up to 20 weeks, and it’s easy to get in NZ – it’s pretty much ‘abortion on demand.’

The changes are horrific:

  • Abortion up to birth
  • No pain relief as the fetus is being dismembered
  • No life saving treatment for a baby born alive. Yes, infanticide is now legal.

Abortion NZ

I believe our abortion laws were liberalised in keeping with the demands of the UN.  It’s right here on their ‘Sustainable Developments Page,’ as part of Agenda 2030.  Population control is a UN development goal and Jacinda Adern wants to tick all the boxes she can while she’s in power.

access-to-legal-abortion-services-needed

Source: UN Sustainable Development Goals – Access to legal abortion services needed, to prevent 47,000 women dying each year – UN rights experts

In accordance with this, the NZ government stated they wanted to “remove abortion from the Crimes Act,” so I read the Act, and I found that abortion is only a crime when it’s procured illegally, as in a backstreet abortion.  (Section 183 – 187A of the Criminal Act for procurement.)

Currently, this law stands to protect NZ women from unregistered abortionists – but the government has now removed this protection, because the tightening of the definition of ‘health practitioner’ to doctor, midwife or obstetric nurse was defeated in the second reading of the bill.

So now, it’s legal to go to an unregistered abortionist.  Is this fulfilling the requirement?  Will Jacinda get a big fat tick on her sustainable development report card from the UN for this?  If the UN was involved, was this a suitable goal for New Zealand?

A sane society would offer a choice to women.  Women could be sheltered, paid to give birth, and have the child adopted out – but because there’s no statutory definition of fetuses or embryos as “unborn children” within New Zealand law, the evil people in power have mandated it’s okay to rip a live human fetus apart or leave a baby to die in a bucket.

I never thought I’d see the day when a NZ government would hold human life in such contempt.

Calves have more protection.  On 1st June 2015, a new law came into effect stopping farmers from inducing cows and killing the calf who wouldn’t survive being born too early.  This practice was considered “inhumane and cruel” by the MP’s promoting the change.  Unborn calves are now protected from this.

Green party logic

Also, the Whanganui River, the river that flows through my old home town, has been made “a legal person.”  That philosophy fits right in with ‘Gaia,’ but having children does not.

The contempt extends to the NZ public.

The public outcry has been ignored by the government and media.  The protest marches were ignored.

Media

Also ignored were submissions; 90.6% of the submissions were ignored by the parliamentary select committee.  Demonstrations which filled the streets were ignored and under-reported.  When the public clapped in the public gallery after MP Agnes Loheni opposed the bill,  the speaker of the house threatened to have them removed.

“National MP Agnes Loheni is staunchly against the bill and was quick to point out 91.6 percent of the submissions opposed the bill.  She said she was not scaremongering because there was plenty to be alarmed about, and diminishing the life of an unborn baby to the point they were no longer called babies meant humanity had been lost.

“Late-term surgical abortions are nothing short of barbaric,” she said.  “There is nothing kind in it – a truly progressive society protects the rights of all its members down to the smallest and most vulnerable, the unborn child.”

There was huge applause from the public gallery following her speech – prompting Speaker Trevor Mallard to threaten removal if it happened again.”

In desperation, another demonstration against the Abortion Legislation Bill was held at Parliament at the same time as the bill’s second reading, and this time it used graphic visual images.

“Out of respect for post-abortive woman, the pro-life movement has generally resisted using graphic visual photos of aborted babies in public places,” organiser Gina Sunderland said.

”But that’s all about to change.”

But Ardern, who supports the bill, said she was personally against the use of such images.

Instrgram 'welcome to our village wee one'

Jacinda and ger baby Neve. What would her baby’s name have been if she’d been terminated – “Never?”

“I just think that’s not a way to share the legitimate views that other people will have,” Ardern said.

Jacinda Ardern opposed to ‘graphic’ abortion law rally at Parliament

Leighton Baker of New Conservative stated that when Government ministers proclaim discomfort at being shown images of what they seek to legitimise, it proves that they are disconnected from reality and society.

There certainly is a disconnect.

Links

Here’s a handy summary of the amendments to the abortion bill that were all defeated on the second reading.  They show the real agenda of the pro-abortion lot.   Key amendments voted on were:
* requirement for abortion procedures post-20 week to ensure that fetus does not feel pain (as per the Animal Welfare Act which requires vets to ensure that animals don’t feel pain) – DEFEATED
* tightening of definition of ‘health practitioner’ to doctor, midwife or obstetric nurse (to avoid unsafe abortions) – DEFEATED
* abortions post-20 weeks only for extreme circumstances – DEFEATED
* keeping conscientious objection standards the same as they currently are (the bill currently weakens the protections) – DEFEATED
* restricting employment discrimination on grounds of conscience – DEFEATED
* cultural considerations to be considered consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi (woman’s wellbeing protected by recognising her whakapapa and the whanaungatanga responsibilities of her family, whanau, hapu, iwi, and family group) – DEFEATED
* annual reporting of abortion statistics (bill only requires reporting for 18 months after passing!) – DEFEATED

Also, 80 New Zealand MPs voted down the amendment of National MP Simon O’Connor which clarified that a qualified health practitioner who performed an abortion that results in the birth of a child after an attempted abortion has a duty to provide the child with appropriate medical care and treatment, no different than the duty owed to provide medical care and treatment to any other child born.  It was DEFEATED.
Source: Another atrocious day in Parliament, Family First


How’s this for gender-bending crap?  Other proposed amendments, in Green MP Jan Logie’s name, would scrap the 20-week legal test altogether or replace “woman” in the bill with “pregnant woman or other pregnant person.”  The 20 week limit was scrapped but they decided not to include a “pregnant man” in the definition.


Infanticide:  What Happens to a Child Born-alive? The Media Won’t Tell Us.


Opinion shaping: here’s an example of the poor quality of reporting on the issue in NZ – abortion was not a crime.  Abortion no longer a crime in New Zealand as law change passes final reading in Parliament.


NZ PM rushes world’s most extreme abortion legislation into law while country distracted with pandemic

The great Greta antidote

What do you think of Greta Thunberg?  Did you know that on Sept 23rd 2019, the same day that the child made her impassioned speech at the UN about her fears of a climate emergency, 500 scientists sent a registered letter to the UN Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people? 

Unfortunately the scientists were ignored by the UN and the media.  Greta stole the show.  Opposing voices were accused of “bullying” her.

Now, there is another teenage voice being heard above the shrill cries of the doomsayers.

Her name is Naomi Seibt.  She’s not ant-Greta: “The reason I don’t like the term “ant-Greta is it suggests that I myself am an indoctrinated puppet I guess for the other side.” 

Naomi Seibt believes that the doomsayers are despicable: “Climate change alarmism at it’s very core is despicable and anti-human.”
Naomi Seibt vs. Greta Thunberg: Whom Should We Trust?

nami-vs-greta

Naomi versus Greta, who do you think is more reasoned?  I know who I prefer.

As for the UN and media denying the scientists their voice – how dare they?


Here’s another smart young lady, a fellow countrywoman of Greta’s no less, who’s pushing back against the propaganda and “the prophet of panic.”

What is really happening in Sweden, Greta?

My thanks to Martin Harris of Uncensored magazine for giving me the link to this young Swedish woman.


The real deal, versus propaganda

Have you heard of promising young inventors like Boyan Slat or Morgan Vague, or experts like Dr Judith Curry?  Why aren’t they being promoted?  Obviously scientific fact and cleaning the world of the rubbish produced by the multi-nationals is not a priority.

Compare

Morgan Vague Scientist

Media manipulation

The propaganda value of Greta

What has Greta invented?  What are her qualifications?  Obviously she’s been used for propaganda.

Propaganda

I am more reminded of Wednesday Adams.

Wednesday Adams - Greta Thunberg


Links

TECHNOCRACY NEWS: 
A group of 500 esteemed scientists and professionals in climate science have officially notified the United Nations that there is no climate crisis and that spending trillions on a non-problem is ‘cruel and imprudent’. This letter will not make it into national or global media, nor will it cause the UN to change its ways. If these same scientists understood Technocracy, they would change their battle strategy. ⁃ TN Editor

The “anti-Greta” Thunberg debuts on Fox News with a message of hope for young people.

WaPo showcases the “Anti-Greta” Thunberg: In an interesting turn of events, the Washington Post has done a front-page feature on Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic and YouTuber that WaPo describes as “… 19-year-old German who, like Greta, is blond, eloquent and European.”

The Elite Machine Behind Greta Thunberg  A look at the powerful, elite-backed machine behind Greta Thunberg and the true agenda behind her world tour.

Are we being manipulated by the media?

We’re being presented with images designed to arouse an emotional response so we will accept or even clamour for the agenda the corporations are promoting.  It’s called “marketing.”

Here are three examples of these images.

I’ll start with the current one:

The widely shared photo of the little girl crying as a U.S. Border Patrol agent patted down her mother became a symbol of the families pulled apart by the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy at the border, even landing on the new cover of Time magazine.

The whole thing is a lie.

Time Weldome to America

The girl’s father told The Washington Post on Thursday night that his child and her mother were not separated, and a U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman confirmed that the family was not separated while in the agency’s custody.

Source: MSN.com The crying Honduran girl on the cover of Time was not separated from her mother.

That cover was designed for us to think Trump is heartless.  Oh, that mean nasty Trump, enforcing a policy the Obama administration brought in.


Syrian boy drowned because his father wanted new teeth

“While acknowledging that the boy’s death was a tragedy, he said: “That boy and his family had lived in Turkey for three years. The money for that boy’s father to pay the people smugglers was sent from Canada.” He added, “The father sent them on that boat so the father could get dental treatment. They were in no fear, they were in no persecution and they were in no danger in Turkey.”

Source: The Daily Caller, Story Begins To Unravel About Drowned Syrian Boy

Alan-s-father-back-in-Syria-604590

They weren’t refugees.  Those in favour of mass immigration have used this heart rending image to great effect.  Anyone who wants the flood of migrants controlled or stopped will be seen as heartless.


We’ve all seen that photo of a polar bear stranded on the iceberg … Al Gore’s poster image for “climate change.”

They want children cuddling their teddy bears to cry for their parents do something about “climate change.”

polarbrs

There was just one problem: the photograph was taken not of polar bears “stranded” on ice – far from it.  Rather, the bears were wandering around their natural environment as they do every day.

Let’s hear it from the photographer,

The student who took the photograph, however, gives her account: ‘They were on the ice when we found them and on the ice when we left. They were healthy, fat and seemed comfortable on their iceberg.’ Amanda Byrd, an Australian graduate student at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), says she took the picture around three years ago – in the summer. The photograph was not ‘taken by environmentalists’ but as part of a field trip with the university.

Furthermore, the photographer wasn’t even asked permission:

Byrd is clearly a little miffed that ‘the image you have seen around the world was distributed without my consent, and [with] the wrong byline’.

Source: MRC News Busters

Be careful with mass-produced news items containing emotive images designed to grip people.  It may not be what it seems.

“Chicken Little” and the news from 1922 OR it pays to dig deeper

Chicken littleOriginally I posted this and I would like to thank one of my readers for showing me the last two lines were an inaccuracy.  As a result I dug deeper and found a copy of the original article.

It really does pay to dig as deeply as possible and try to find the original source so as not to be caught out by fake news.


Judging by the news since New Year, 2018 will be full of claims of “record weather events” caused by “global warming.”  Is it true, or is it an agenda?  

Here’s a news report from 1922:

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in
some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report
to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway

Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north
as 81 degrees 29 minutes.

Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.

Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones,
the report continued, while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.

Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north are being encountered.


The above part is true.  You can read the entire article by clicking on the Anchorage Daily Times.

The part in red had been added to it, which I retract, although it is what the UN is claiming.

Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.”

* * * * * * * * *
The report was from November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post – 96 years ago.

This must have been caused by the Model T Ford’s emissions.

arctic-temperature-zone-adt-1922

Headline from 1922


And now for that facts …

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

Govt funded scam science

Why is fake news always bad?  Here’s the good news:

Despite What You’ve Heard, Global Warming Isn’t Making Weather More Extreme.


Extreme Climate Change: The 1933-1938 Period Was One of Very Severe Weather Events, Including Global Heat Waves.

Taxpayer funded climate-doomsday scientists and the mainstream media ambulance chasers perpetuate the myth that today’s severe weather events are a result of human-CO2 caused extreme climate change – actually, today’s bad weather seems rather mild to similar events decades before large human CO2 emissions.

Climate change is a hoax

My advice, turn your TV off and don’t be myth-taken.  I wish you all the best for the New Year.  Here’s some wisdom from the Bible:

 “As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.” Genesis 8:22 (NIV)

See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ – Colossians 2:8.

Freedom, 2018

Australia debates same-sex marriage, but was NZ given a say?

This time Australia is being pressured to change the marriage law.  They’ll be told that New Zealand did it, so why shouldn’t they?  The media are making it sound like there was a public mandate for same-sex marriage in 2013, but that’s simply not true.  New Zealanders weren’t asked.  We weren’t given a referendum.  We were silenced. 

The one and only time we got a voice was in a TV3 news poll.  This was the response.  There were nearly 17,000 respondents with 78% against.  The media were shocked at the strength of public opinion against and there was a media blackout over our opinion.

NZ support for gay marriage 2013

NZ TV3 news poll from 2013, nearly 17,000 respondents, 78% against.

SHOCK – TV3 Campbell Live ‘Marriage-Equality bill’ poll

Here’s a cartoon from 2013 showing who had the say in NZ – politicians.

Marriage

At least Australians are being asked.  Why weren’t New Zealanders given the right to vote on this?

gettyimages-846674072

And before you label me a “hater” for pointing out the facts – I don’t hate homosexuals.  What I do hate is living in a society where people are shouted down and silenced, slurred for having a different opinion and not given a say in what their government does!  It’s called injustice.

These are the questions I hope Australians will ask themselves;  Who is driving this agenda?  Should government legislate morality?  What societal benefits are there in same-sex marriage?  Why are people who disagree being labelled “homophobes” and “bigots?”


Australians are voting on same-sex marriage — and it’s starting to get ugly