With so many things competing for attention, videos 95 minutes long can get skipped. This is one that shouldn’t be. It’s one of the most important I’ve listened to. Del Bigtree interviewed Dr Michael Yeadon, and here’s what he had to say. I’ve transcribed the notes for your info.
Until 2011, Dr Michael Yeadon worked as the chief scientist and vice-president of Pfizer‘s allergy and respiratory research unit which focused on allergy and respiratory medical research. He founded the biotechnology company Ziarco which was sold to Novartis in 2017.
Here’s what he had to say:
“I want people not to be frightened of this virus. I’m afraid everything our government and scientific advisors have told us over the last 18 months are lies. All lies. They’re telling untruth deliberately and we call that lying. I think the objective is to make us receptive to the vaccines and lastly, where the hell is this all going? I think this is serious crimes going on.” He wants to see the government officials in the dock for mass murder.
He goes on to list the lies we’ve been told;
Lie no #1 Covid is dangerous
“How dangerous is this? The best epidemiologist in the world, John Ioannidis, has assessed this and said it’s a little bit worse than the average flu. But governments give us the impression that nothing has been as bad as this since the Spanish Flu – and this is simply not true.”
Lie no #2 There are no treatments
“They told us there’s no treatments. That is simply not true. It makes me angry that good treatments that are well evidenced have been hidden and sick people have been deprived of excellent, safe therapy in order to continue people’s fear.”
Lie no #3 False positives on PCR tests
“The PCR test: the people doing the testing are being sneaky, they’re not saying how many cycles they’re doing.” He believes there are bad actors on the PCR testing side that produce scare stories. He learned that when you get beyond 25 cycles it became more and more difficult to infect cells in a culture dish. (13:35)
Lie no #4 People without symptoms can pass it on to other people.
“The thing that really triggered me was when I was told that people without symptoms can be a respiratory viral threat to other people. Now I knew this wasn’t true. Remember this is my area. I’ve worked in pulmonary disease for 32 years in total. People without symptoms can’t pass it on to other people.”
They did a really big study where they followed lots of people who were PCR positive and they split them into two groups – PCR positive with symptoms and PCR positive without symptoms. They found the ones with symptoms infected another household member about 18% of the time. So it’s not as much as you think as there’s a lot of prior immunity in the population. People who were PCR positive who had no symptoms – less than 1%.
The reason we have to wear masks is the belief that the disease can be spread when we’re asymptomatic.
“I realised in about May last year (2020) that lock downs don’t and can’t work.” He’s heard people say “you must slow transmission.” He realised it’s a category error – it’s got nothing to do with lots of human contacts – it’s infectious contacts. If you’re not symptomatic, you can’t represent an infectious contact for somebody else.
It’s a disease of institutions. Places where you could catch it are hospitals and old folks homes. Lock downs could not work because it’s a disease of institutions.
So that’s the list of lies.
“And now I’m going to the next lie, which is the lie of 2021 : variants.
Lie no #5 Variants
We were told it’s novel virus, and because it’s novel, no-one will have any immunity. It frightened the world. In the first three weeks I worked out that was not true, because I looked on Gen Bank, I looked on Sequence, I realised it was something like 80% similar to SARS 2003 and maybe 60% similar to a common cold causing Coronavirus, and I thought ‘phew, we’re going to be okay.’ I figured there’d be a lot of people who’ve been exposed to one or another of those … immunology is my strongest suit and I knew lots of people would have prior immunity. If you overcome viruses you are left with very durable, strong immunity.”
If you sequence a virus and it’s slightly different from the original because it’s got some copying errors, it’s called a variant. That’s all it is. But there’s o much talk about it, people get the impression that it’s significantly different. If you find a variant that’s most different, it’s 0.3% different. In other words, 99.7% similar or more.
The immune system can recognise and deal with a virus that’s 60% different. It’s not possible that a variant can escape human immunity and the stories they’ve been telling you are lies and any studies scientists have put out about this are contrived. Theoretically and empirically it’s not possible. They’re not different enough to worry about.
A group of American immunologists found some people who’d been infected with one variant and asked them to donate cells, they did. They challenged those cells with every variant they had and sure enought, the T cells responded to every single variant that they had. Whoever these people are, they are national heroes.”
How gene based vaccines work:
Time 1.0.0: “These gene based vaccines work differently, it’s a multi-step thing like an Apollo rocket. First you inject the code, then the code has to get to a tissue, then it’s got to be taken up into the tissue, then it’s got to be copied from the mRNA into a spike protein, and then the spike protein has to be expressed by your cell or released from your cell, and get to the immune system. That’s four or five steps and because they have not measured them, every one of of those steps will be subject to what I call normal variation.
If you take 20,000 people, one person would have failure to have the vaccine taken up and very little of it expressed and in the wrong place and not really ticking your immune system very much. Now we put a person at the other end that got loads of the vaccine taken up in large quantities, expressed at high amounts, in the dangerous part of your body. Any I think that’s why some people are fine, and other people die or brain blood clots.
I would call it ‘tail risk cubed.’ Where does the vaccine taken go, where is it taken up, how strongly is it expressed? Every one of those is subject to variation – you imagine tail risk : the highest amount, the greatest expression, in the worst most vulnerable part of the body. I think that’s the explanation. and I think you carry on making vaccines using this design, you might be okay with the next one – just don’t express something that’s poisonous, but we’ll always have much greater variability, because you’ll have tail risk cubed.”
Time 1.12.40: Polyethylene Glycol (also knows as ‘PEG’). One of the other things they pointed out in the petition, is that some of the vaccines are using a chemical called ‘Polyethylene Glycol.’ It’s quite a common chemical, used in make up and manufacturing. But what you don’t do generally is inject it into people. A small amount of it is present in the lipid nano-particles that surround the mRNA vaccine. It turns out quite a few people are allergic to PEG and the risk is if you inject it some people will have an anaphlactic shock and could die. There are thousands of people on the VAERS database who’ve had an anaphlaxis.
“It’s a brand new technology, anything could happen.”
“Why have we got ourselves into the position where they’ve vaccinated 75 % of the population in Britain with no long-term safety?” he asks. “What happens of something bad happens? People seem to lack the imagination that bad things do happen. Some of them we’ve predicted, and then they’ve come true. It makes you think, is someone trying to kill large numbers of people? And I’m afraid the only thing that ties every single one of the major observations is that whoever has organised the lies has as an objective ultimately to lead to large numbers of deaths. And I’ll add just a few sentences why that fits and nothing else.
The lies of the narrative
All the things I’ve described, I call them the lies of the narrative, we never would have used in 2018 or 2015. All of them have been invented all at once and then spread around the world in 2020. It’s not just my government in the UK or their advisors that got it wrong – it’s the same lies, at the same time, by every government. So you can start with the observation that by Feb / March 2020 there was already a plan to deceive you.
Then the public were told that they would need a vaccine passport on order to travel. When your government is giving you something that is a) stupid and b) illegal, you’ve got two choices; you can go along with it, or stand up and fight it. If I’ve been vaccinated and primed to destroy the virus, then who is it that has to show their vaccine passport? I am absolutely certain that no-one will benefit from vaccine passports. It’s appalling that the media haven’t asked themselves what is it about the passport system that can keep people safe? It’s a stupid idea. To suggest a vaccine passport is needed to go to a chosen university – that is illegal, that is coercion. You aren’t allowed to coerce people to take medical procedures, especially experimental ones, it’s explicitly prevented by the Nuremberg code. It’s illegal under international law. As a toxicologist and a drug discoverer, we knew it was wrong before they even approved it. We predicted three kinds of toxicity – all of which occurred.
Here’s what I’d say to people,
“Don’t get vaccinated by these Covid-19 vaccines, I don’t think they’re safe enough.“
In terms of vaccine passports – I cannot think of a battle that is more important in my entire 61 years than preventing this system coming into being. If we allow ourselves to be fooled that by carrying an app on our phones to cross a regulated threshold – what we’ll be bringing into being is the world’s first common format digital ID with an editable health flag and this whole system will be interoperable from anywhere in the world. There’s no limit to what you could be prevented from doing.
If that system goes into being; whoever operates that database and the algorithm has complete control over you. If your contact-less card doesn’t work then you’re prevented from that regulated threshold or transaction and there’s nothing you can do about it. This is what I think is possible, and it’s not a plot from a sci-fi novel, I think the whole point of the pandemic and the lies and the vaccines was to get to the electronic digital ID.
Once that system is up and running, and we’ve already been told about variants – which is a lie, you might have to have booster shots they said, and I know you don’t need booster shots – because they’re not vaccines. At least one of them, Moderna, said they were bottling a billion doses of booster shots – and when I heard that, I actually felt real fear, because I thought “there’s not a vaccine in there.” They’re already vaccinated. Immunologists will tell you they can’t be vaccines. So what are they?”
He is worried we’ll be texted to go and get our booster shots, and if we won’t then our vaccine passport will be deactivated. It could happen – and there’s already evidence that there are some very bad actors around. At the very least we’d be giving up control to a machine, a database – whoever operates it. What if what’s in those vaccines – the third, fourth, fifth one, is gene sequences designed to kill you? I don’t know, it’s not my crime – but if I wanted to set up a system where I could have complete control and with plausible deniability, administer something to billions of people that over months or years could kill them, I couldn’t think of a better plot than this one.
If people think I have completely lost my mind, then break the logic, tell me where I’ve misspoken. Otherwise you’re relying on, “people aren’t that evil.” I’m afraid there are evil people. Look at Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot … there are people everywhere over time who have been willing to kill other people to get their way. All I’m suggesting is that’s what’s happening now and the only difference is it’s technology rather than weapons and the only other difference is the internet has allowed it to involve pretty much every person on the planet. But other than that, it’s the same grubby, revolting people with criminal minds. There are bad people who want to do bad things, and they’ve invented a system that will allow that to happen. And even if you believe what the government’s told you, given what I’ve just described about the vaccine passports, for goodness sake make sure you do it on paper – don’t use a digital database.
I’m not a religious person, but I decided I was looking into the face of evil.
This plan did not take five minutes, and in order to put it into place, you have to do so many things that will result in avoidable deaths. Lots of people have signed off, for example to pretend that there are not safe and effective medicines. Once a man or woman is prepared to sign an order ir give a verbal order, they know it will result in the deaths of say, 20,000 people. I put it to you that you’ve already decided you are a mass-murderer and it doesn’t really matter whether there are five zeros, seven zeros or nine zeros.
We’ve been lied to about the severity of the virus – it’s not that bad. We’ve had hidden from us effective medicines. There are loads of things about the narrative that clearly aren’t true, like lock-downs and masks. The narrative of variants is also not true. So even if the vaccines so far are safe – you’re being misled, really to the Gates of hell by this variants story. People have had double jabs – they’ll expect a top up.
Here’s another test – is there a benign explanation for all this? So I might be wrong in the conclusion – it’s not my crime, but I’m not wrong that this is misleading and deliberate and it’s hurting people.
The good news is there’s not much to be frightened of virus wise – the thing to be terrified of is your government. People in England who don’t look at alternative news stories think that what they’ve been told is true.
I celebrate when people have taken their freedoms back.
Don’t be afraid of the virus – it’s pretty much gone, but be terrified of your government. You must take back your freedoms. They’re not going to give it back to you because they’ve not taken it from you legitimately. There was never any need to lock you down, they’ve made you wear masks that are frightening, they’ve told you wrong things about the severity of the virus, deprived you of effective medical treatment, and exposed you to dangerous vaccines.
The coup-de-grace will be a combination of vaccine passports and then the next step. Take your freedoms back tomorrow, peacefully, and it will all be over. If you don’t, I don’t know where it’s going to end, but not good.
Polyethylene glycol – The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains: a total lipid content of 1.93 mg (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] : Dangerous SM-102 in Moderna Vaccine Causes Cancer, Infertility and Other Health Issues
Booster shots: NZ in talks with Pfizer around potential booster shot
PCR Tests: Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus. Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s. So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?
The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.
Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+. Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.
Source: OffG, WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives. Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.