Scam

Who wants to be a carbon trillionaire?

carbon trillionaire

https://steemit.com/climate/@corbettreport/who-wants-to-be-a-carbon-trillionaire Eat your heart out, Al Gore. Being a carbon billionaire is so passé now that we’re in the age of the $100 trillion climate swindle. So the real question is who (or at least which corporate front) will be the first carbon trillionaire? Will it be a carbon eugenics promoting Rockefeller or a global government […]

 

Carbon con

Why is carbon being treated as a pollutant?  Does this look like a pollutant?  It’s a TWO minute science video, showing the effects of carbon on plants; TWO plants, TWO C02 concentrations, 42 days …

Source: http://www.co2science.org/education/truthalerts/v13/cowpea.php

So we can see carbon is a good thing. Only junk science would insist it’s not. Don’t healthier plants equal better crops and more food?  Here’s a novel idea, stop the forests being felled in Indonesia and the Amazon!  And plant more trees!

Were there any voices of scientific reason at the Paris Climate talks?  I asked myself. I hoped so, for the world’s sake.  We don’t need the global economy bombed back to the dark ages with carbon reductions, regulations and wealth redistribution.  Or be fed insects, an idea that the globalists are trying to push on us.

There were some like-minded people at Paris.
CFACT (Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow) ‘Storms’ Paris With Four Inconvenient Facts About Global Warming.


CFACT-1Here are the inconvenient facts

Climate Hustle
As well giving the world some inconvenient facts, they’ve also presented an antidote for huckster Al Gore’s “Inconvenient truth,” a ridiculous power point I was subjected to when doing a Diploma of Business.

It’s about time someone did it.  They launched their new movie, Climate Hustle, in Paris at the same time as the climate talks.

“Climate Hustle is the Anti Inconvenient Truth. It’s for people with an open mind who want to know what’s really going on with the world’s climate – as opposed to what hucksters like Al Gore want to persuade them is going on with the world’s climate – all backed up with hard data and evidence presented by scientists who know and understand, among them the Nobel-prize-winning Norwegian physicist Ivar Giaever.”

But will people listen?

Or will they bury their heads in the sand?

Green protesters came to jeer “outside a film they’ll never watch made by people they won’t listen to presenting a message they’re ideologically incapable of comprehending.  If they ever did see Climate Hustle it would be totally lost on them.” 

Source: http://technocracy.news/index.php/2015/12/11/climate-deniers-strike-back-in-paris-during-un-climate-summit/

heads-in-sand

400 Australians who buried their heads in the sand to protest their Prime Minister’s stance on global warming, Nov 2014. If only they could see the irony.

Climate of deception

No warming since 1998Watching the news tonight we got the usual climate change propaganda, with the UN ramping it up a notch.  It’s a scam to bring in a global tax for the new world order.  The only thing that is heating up on this planet is their rhetoric.

The UN get their climate data from the IPCC, which should be thoroughly discredited after Climate Gate in 2009 when the IPCC was caught in a lie.  IPCC lies continue to surface.
2009 LEAKED SCIENTIST EMAILS: Hackers Expose Climate Change Lies
2011 New Emails rock the global warming debate

Consensus is not science.
Man is not the problem.
The IPCC and UN push a political, not a scientific agenda.

Here’s this out today from the Main Online:
Global warming has STALLED since 1998: Met Office admits Earth’s temperature is rising slower than first thought.

The NIPCC (Non Governmental International Panel on Climate Change) does proper science.  Last year they found that no empirical evidence exists to substantiate the claim that 2°C of warming presents a threat to the planet.  They cited thousands of peer-reviewed articles, which the United Nations-sponsored panel on climate change and the media ignored.

NIPCC’s conclusion, drawn from its extensive review of the scientific evidence, is that any human global climate signal is so small as to be embedded within the background variability of the natural climate system and is not dangerous.  At the same time, global temperature change is occurring, as it always naturally does.

I recommend a visit to their sites if you are interested in the facts.
NIPCC: http://www.nipccreport.org/
C02 Science: http://www.co2science.org/