Political correctness

Police brutality doesn’t belong to one race

Liberals see life quite differently.  I read this post after the subsequent riots over the murder of George Floyd: “Here’s an example of how white privilege sounds: You keep saying that “It’s horrible that an innocent black man was killed, but destroying property has to stop.”  Try saying “It’s horrible that property is being destroyed, but killing innocent black men has to stop.”  “You’re prioritising the wrong part.”

It sounds high-minded but actually it’s not.  It’s racist – white people (privileged) are portrayed as being more concerned with things than they are with black men (the victims) being killed.  I’ll never go along with that, for me it’s “dragon speak.”

The murder of George Floyd wasn’t about race, or “white privilege,” it was about police brutality.  I tried to point that out by referring to a previous incident in Minneapolis where in 2017 a white woman named Justine Damond was shot by a Somali cop.  I blogged about that at the time.  It took eight months for the police officer to be bought to justice, because of a “blue wall of silence” from the Minneapolis police.  At least the four cops in the latest Minneapolis police murder were dealt with immediately.

However I was shut down, accused of commenting on every political issue with “cherry picked evidence.”

I wasn’t allowed to continue and I didn’t get to mention that the year before Justine Damond was shot dead, Philando Castile, an innocent 32 year old black man was shot dead in 2016 by Jeronimo Yanez, a Hispanic police officer.

I stand on my opinion of police brutality – in these cases the police officers and victims are of all colours and backgrounds.

Quote about racism 1

I said that looting and rioting is not protest. Two days before, a retired St. Louis police captain has been killed by looters. His name was David Dorn.

Do you know which communities get harmed the most by this?  Black communities.

Businesses ruined by looters

Here’s another victim of rioting and looting.  He got away with his life but not his livelihood.  This man was just about to open after the Covid-19 lock-down, and then the riots happened.  He was at his business trying to clean up the mess left by the rioters, and while the cameras were there, looters came back for his safe. 

Black business owner sobs

Business owner sobs while looters burn his bar and return for the safe

He’d just started the business and invested his life savings into this sports bar.  Fortunately, good people came together and crowd funded to get him back on his feet.

Riot Casualty: Brooklyn Center Firefighter Loses Sports Bar

Nothing changes.  Haters are going to hate, stirrers are going to stir, and looters are going to loot.  Tucker Carlson reported:  “Underneath it all, this violence doesn’t have much to do with the behaviour of the Minneapolis Police Department.  For evidence, watch this tape from the Los Angeles Riots in 1992.  It was 30 years ago.  It could have been shot this afternoon.”

Criminal mob destroys businesses & neighbourhoods, Tucker Carlson shows them the mirror

It’s heart-breaking.  You’ll see an elderly black business owner crying, “It’s not right!  “It’s not right!  It’s not right what y’all doing!  I came from the ghetto too!  Same as all of you kids.  Why are you destroying my business?  Why are you destroying my truck?  Why are you stealing my computer?  I tried to make it!  Can’t you understand that?”

Tucker Carlson: “It’s not a racial dispute.  The old man is fighting to defend civilisation.  The young men are fighting to tear it down.  And those are the battle lines, they always are.  Which side have our leaders taken?

The rioters in Minneapolis and other places act as if they’re allowed to loot and burn – and in fact they are allowed.  No-one stops them.  We’re told the crimes of the mob are “the punishment we deserve.”  That’s their argument, and many seem to buy it.  The game is rigged.”


Racism

It seems victim roles are automatically assigned by skin colour – white for privilege and black for victim.  It’s patronising and a lazy, slack, stupid way of looking at things – and it plays into the hands of the globalists, the billionaires who want to control us.

People of all skin colours experience racism.  It’s been that way ever since the Tower of Babel.  For instance, did you know that Black people experience discrimination in China, and the Chinese have experienced discrimination elsewhere?  It’s an unfortunate part of the human condition that Jesus came to save us from.  It won’t be overcome when we’re all pointing fingers at each other.   What would Jesus do?  Wouldn’t He say we all matter?

McDonald’s refused to serve black people in China and blamed coronavirus

Are the media stirring things up?

In Auckland, people went to a “Black lives matter march,” making a mockery of all the Covid-19 restrictions, especially distancing.  Who stirred them up – the media?  Why aren’t people protesting about China’s treatment of the citizens of Hong Kong?  Or why aren’t they protesting the violence being done against whites in South Africa?  Have they not heard about that?   Black violence in South Africa is not reported in NZ – we only get the syndicated stuff from the American news networks.

Just be aware of the media’s role in all of this, and watch for articles about “racism.”  United we stand and divided we fall.  Who is doing the stirring?  And why?  Who are the shadowy figures trying to divide and conquer along racial lines?

Hotep Nation: “Anyway, black lives matter is a front organization for the globalists. They are here to destroy so that the powers that be can gain more power. For example, they’ll complain about police brutality and the powers that be will provide the solution of body cameras which equals more Orweillian “big brother is watching” surveillance. To chant that phrase gives them power. I do not say black lives matter because that is redundantly rhetorical.”

All-Lives-matter


To say All Lives Matter or Black Lives Matter is to subject yourself to political correctness. If you say All Lives Matter you will be politically correct with a white conservative crowd but anger blacks and liberals. To say Black Lives Matter is to be politically correct among blacks but offend white conservatives.  Source: HotepNation

Black men speak out

This former officer Brandon Tatum is going viral for delivering this incredible response.  He addresses both black and whites.

The Hodge Twins: “Liberals – you pushing that lie, it’s to make you feel better.  You’re not helping them.  You’re digging that hole of oppression deeper and deeper.  They want to keep them on the Democrat plantation.  Most blacks killed by their own race.  Everyone knows black lives matter.”


Links

How a controversial study found that police are more likely to shoot whites, not blacks

Are more whites killed by the police than blacks?

The notion that police are involved in some mass shooting of black men is not at all true and the numbers back that up. Here are the FBI stats: Table 21

Lives matter

Parents persecuted in NZ

RespectThe PC brigade strikes again.  In New Zealand, we can no longer discipline our kids in public.

A father took his three children aged nine, seven and five to visit their mother in hospital. He didn’t have to be there as he and the mother were no longer together.  That act of caring brought him an assault charge.

His name is Michael Laws, former Wanganui Mayor. His crime? He smacked one of his children in front of a nurse, who then complained to the police.
“Laws accused over child assault” blares the shrill headline from NZ Yahoo news.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/20860555/laws-accused-over-child-assault/

Now this father stands accused, and the police are having to investigate a child assault complaint, when their time could be better spent elsewhere.  There are heaps of burglaries to investigate from NZ’s P epidemic.

I have been in that same hospital with my child, where I allowed them to jab her with a needle – and it made her cry. What I did was preventative act of caring, necessary for me to do as a parent.  How come jabbing my daughter with a needle so she wouldn’t catch whooping cough or diptheria is not termethey-had-no-rightd an assault, when giving a quick smack to a child has stepped over the line is!

It’s sad that NZ has been turned into a small-minded nanny state where parents are under threat. 

This man was a well known person in Wanganui and a good father.  Where was the nurse’s common sense?  He’s a Dad left bringing up his children on his own in a land of missing fathers and he didn’t deserve this nonsense.  He was visiting his estranged partner and didn’t even have to be there.  His actions were those of a caring parent, not a bad one!

Why did Yahoo news make that nefarious accusation into a headline? You have to get to the second paragraph before you realise what he is guilty of – a smack!  What kind of Orwellian newspeak are they peddling?  I don’t want my opinion shaped, or have to read to paragraph two to get at the truth.

associate_prof_joan_durrant

NZ, first country to enact a ban (on smacking) following the publication of the UN Study on “violence against children”

How did we come to this  in NZ?  This putrid piece of PC excrement, disguised as a law, was passed in 2007 to criminalise parents who smack?  It came in under the government of Helen Clark, after a UN publication on violence against children.  Helen Clark has been amply rewarded – she is now third in power at the UN.

smacking referendumIt was brought in despite public petitions and protests, and without a referendum.  It was finally put to public referendum under John Key’s government in 2009, where it was asked “Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?”  A whopping 87.4% of NZ answered ‘no’.  Nothing happened.  Why not, and why haven’t we been listened to?

John KeyJohn Key’s assurances are in direct conflict with what groups like Barnados, the Children’s Commissioner and Plunket are telling parents, and the way the anti-smacking law is being enforced by the police, CYF and the Family Court. And in September 2010 in Parliament, all political parties, except for ACT, sent a clear message that a light smack is not ok when they rejected the very amendment that National MP’s had been vigorously lobbying for when in opposition! Law-abiding parents raising great kids are now confused.

Now, in 2020

Things have got a lot worse for parents since this UN-mandated law was enacted.  We’ve got big government in a small country and this is what it looks like.  If you’re a parent under stress, be careful reaching out to Plunket.  They’re no longer to be trusted and will get the state involved.

This website has some good information for parents, with links to lawyers and legal advice: https://protectgoodparents.org.nz